She is in the process of creating a scapegoat out of the clerk who attended the symposium for election fraud. It’s really that simple.
Sounds about right.
if the county clerk did actually “allow an unauthorized person into sensitive areas where its election equipment is located, had turned off surveillance cameras that were supposed to be monitoring those machines and failed to show proper chain of custody after new software was installed” then I hardly think it is scapegoating. I don’t care who does those things — they all smack of crooked elections.