[stockpirate]

I think he was referring to martial law

[Lazamataz]

I think he was referring to martial law

Then you are assuming the first interpretation. I actually embrace the second interpretation, especially since he clarified what he posted, in a later post.

Of course, which of the two interpretations is really true, is not my point. My point is, why leave room for doubt and room for purposed misinterpretation (by the press)?

[Robert DeLong]

No, he wasn't referring to martial law, he was referring to the fact that fraud or dishonesty invalidates any contract, including the Constitutional contract between the U.S. citizens and their government. That the election fraud, if allowed to stand without remedy, has abrogated that Constitution.

That the only way to remedy the situation so that the Constitution is neither abolished or nullified, is to either reinstate the true winner of the election, or to hold a second election.

[Georgia Girl 2]

“I think he was referring to martial law”.

Yes so do I. I think Trump is telegraphing what’s to come. Every week the reveals are rolling out more and more egregious evidence of fraud and govt malfeasance in 2020. This is the final wake up before action is taken. 2020 simply cannot be allowed to stand.

[knarf]

I rejected Trump in the beginning and sided with Cruz in part, BECAUSE he spoke like a middle schooler.

I quickly jumped on board because of some OTHER obvious elements;

Language format aside, he was honest and correct,

Every child is a successful, workaholic adult patriot,

He publicly told Hilary she should be in jail.

This statement is nothing more than a reminder that He DID win the election, it was stolen, and he is still interested in rectifying a terrible wrong and willing to put it all on the line for we, the people.