[linMcHlp]

The College Fix
https://www.thecollegefix.com/

[Chgogal]

I would never pay for May child’s university education if that child chose a stupid DEI type major. I would also strongly recommend against DEI classes of any sort. Heck I would recommend a trade instead of a degree.

[bigbob]

Don’t you wish our side would fight as hard for what we believe in as the left does?

[BobL]

The IDIOTS were the ‘Conservatives’ that actually thought that the colleges would comply.

For Texas, I still want to see a list of the 60 names and their TERMINATION DATES, although I really doubt any of them will be terminated.

[GOPJ]

Yesterday the NY Times reported that this sort of fake compliance with DEI bans is happening at other schools as well. At the University of Tennessee, the campus D.E.I. program is now called the Division of Access and Engagement. The same thing is happening at Florida State University.

Defund them...fire the University's President.

[butlerweave]

Change the name that’s the ticket ,LOL

[clearcarbon]

"Rebranding DEI: How Colleges Are Getting Around State Bans"

Divide-Enslave-Indoctrinate

[bgill]

Just wait for UT’s president to start whining that if he can’t have DEI, then that’ll effectively shut down Longhorn football. Don’t laugh, they tried that excuse on the Top 10% law, which they caused themselves for discrimination of admitting whites into the the Law Dept. (Hopwood v. TX). Yeah, upside down thinking but hey, “just keepin’ Austin weird.” Bunch of loonies. Remember Cocks Not Glocks with sweet little gals protesting the 2nd by waving around giant plastic you know whats.

[Jim Noble]

As I have said many times, anti-white racism has many names - affirmative action, CRT, DEI, it’s all the same, every time you ban one they come up with another name, and they can invent names faster than you can pass laws.

The idea of a “protected class” (blacks, in this case) implies the existence of an “unprotected class”.

The existence of an unprotected class is repugnant to the US Constitution, because it denies the privileges and immunities of US citizens (Article IV, clause 2) to some but not all, and it denies some but not all US citizens the equal protection of the laws (Amendment XIV).

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 repeals certain parts of the Constitution without going through the amendment process. As such, it is presumptively unconstitutional.

[FLT-bird]

Its very simple. Fire some university presidents and department heads. Once a few of them get publicly chit canned, everybody else will get the message real fast.

[coalminersson]

and dei was a work around from the court banning affirmative action admissions. The left is not anything if it isn’t persistent.

[Zathras]

Same methodology as Acorn.
They get “discovered”, they just change the name and keep moving forward.

I’d bet much of DIE is made up of ex Acorn people.