Destroying America for the New World Order? /double layer of tinfoil
Posted on 05/05/2024 10:04:59 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The billionaires want open borders, because it creates an eternal supply of replacement people who can keep wages down.
The liberals want open border because it creates a permanent power base to draw from.
Then there are those who want white people eliminated from the face of the earth and be a historical memory.
Commies start with porous borders, welcoming in anyone loyal to the cause.
PS
I think one can find the ideological roots here:
Antonio Gramsci: the Godfather of Cultural Marxism
https://fee.org/articles/antonio-gramsci-the-godfather-of-cultural-marxism/
(you may have posted this here)
To destroy the United States.
I took our dog into the downtown suburban park to get it acclimated to people. I didn’t realize there was a Mexican celebration going on with music and all sorts of vendors.
The state drivers license booth, Democrat party registration booth, and another booth with some sort of Hispanic assistance thing were all next to each other.
Karl Marx loved open borders. These current Marxists are simply carrying out his wishes. The utopian fantasy never dies.
Now the question of whether it can be destroyed is an open one.
The same mass immigration is also present throughout the West.
One ideological basis comes from people like Clement Attlee, the postWW2 Prime Minister. Attlee, and others of his like from the socialist anti-colonial movement purported to believe that if the races mixed together, there would be no more wars.
I doubt they actually believed this, and just used it as a justification to reduce Whiteness in Britain.
In this was embodied in the 1948 British Nationality Act, which put every resident of any colony as equal citizenship with the UK. (Theoretically, everyone in India and the UK colonies in Africa could have moved to the UK. The criteria was tightened in 1962).
Those who are attacking whiteness really just want to eliminate Christianity. For them, Christianity is the enemy and Western Christianity more so than anybody else.
Attlee was an atheist, but not an aggressive one
Some of the Labour tradition came out of the less strident Non-Conformist Churches. Always prolific sources of woolly-minded Christian Socialism.
But i think you are right that the biggest proponents of mass non-White immigration were always the atheists or (((others))).
BTTT
Declaration of North America (DNA) | The White House
WEB Jan 10, 2023 · Mexico, the United States, and Canada will focus on strategies to bolster our shared continental security against domestic, regional, and global threats, including cyber threats.
The three could become one in the final days. As perhaps one of the ten kings.
bttt
Then there are people who want to see the country destroyed.
“...a society without racism has to be a society without prisons...”
They must think Africa has no prisons. The next time the Hutu’s and Tutsi’s kill each other, the world should just sit back and let it happen. I am actually OK with that. In fact, it should be encouraged (gangs killing each other off).
Get rid of prisons and simply execute the Rat criminals immediately. For misdemeanor offenses, gouge out their eyes and let them beg for food from strangers. /spit
Bonk
Rush nailed it years ago:
The dims want a permanent underclass that will be dependent on the govt and will always vote democrat. This is designed to overwhelm those that vote against big government and ensure that no republican wins any election going forward.
Communists love dissent and chaos until they get control, then any deviation from the accepted state ethos is brutally crushed. Communism and Islam share many of the same attributes with regard to “toeing the line”, mass ignorance to suppress too many questions about policy, and eliminating opponents.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.