Posted on 05/15/2024 1:31:03 AM PDT by Morgana
In December 2022, Congress passed the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA), a pro-life bill that aimed to make the workplace more accessible to pregnant women by requiring employers to provide accommodations to pregnant workers under The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). This bill was implemented at the end of June 2023.However, the Biden administration is manipulating the bill’s language to require that employers provide accommodations for abortion.
The PWFA requires employers to provide “reasonable accommodations to a worker’s known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, unless the accommodation will cause the employer an undue hardship.” However, the bill does not define what is considered a “reasonable accommodation,” or what is considered a “related medical condition.”
Although the measure was meant to help and support pregnant women, Biden officials are manipulating it to promote abortion.
As a result, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced a new rule last week that would warp and twist the federal law to impose pro-abortion regulations on virtually every employer in the country, even those whose religious beliefs dictate that life begins at conception.
Now, two attorneys general have filed a new lawsuit to stop Biden’s new rule and its radical abortion agenda.
Attorneys General Lynn Fitch (Mississippi) and Liz Murrill (Louisiana) filed suit yesterday challenging the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) attempt to hijack the protections of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act to promote the Biden Administration’s effort to impose a national abortion regime.
“The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act was a bipartisan effort to help women in the workplace while they are pregnant and following childbirth,” said Attorney General Lynn Fitch. “But the Biden Administration is threatening to derail commonsense measures, like adequate seating, bathroom and water breaks, and relaxed dress codes, by reading into the law required accommodations for elective abortion, even where that overrides the will of the people or the religious liberty of the employer. This Administration will stop at nothing to undo the Dobbs decision, which gave the people back their power over abortion policymaking, and to impose a national abortion regime.”
“The Pregnant Workers Fairness Act was originally a bipartisan law passed by Congress to support mothers. This new action by the EEOC is another example of bureaucrats rewriting acts of Congress to their own liking, and it’s unconstitutional. We will continue to challenge this administration’s overreach and protect pregnant women,” said Attorney General Liz Murrill.
In their suit, the Attorneys General explain how the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act fills a gap between the Pregnancy Discrimination Act, which prohibits workplace discrimination on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions; the Americans with Disabilities Act, which requires employers to offer affirmative accommodations to workers experiencing qualifying disabilities; and the Family and Medical Leave Act, which provides unpaid extended leave for a serious health condition, such as pregnancy or childbirth, for qualified employees.
The new law was supported by a broad coalition of organizations, including pro-life groups like the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which stated that the law would advance its “goal of ensuring that no woman ever feels forced to choose between her future and the life of her child while protecting the conscience rights and religious freedoms of employers.” During debate on the law, Senator Bob Casey (D-Pennsylvania) specifically rejected the position the EEOC has embraced in this rule when he stated, “under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, the [EEOC] could not – could not – issue any regulation that requires abortion leave, nor does the act permit the EEOC to require employers to provide abortions in violation of State law.”
The complaint, which can be read here, was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana.
p
Someday, God is going to get really pissed off with the baby killers.
I don’t understand how abortion comes under the umbrella of “womens health care”. How does murder connect to care? Birth control is cheap and in many cases free. If you don’t want babies, don’t get pregnant! Unless it’s rape or some other form of abuse, that’s a different story, but there is the morning after pill also.
See Donald, that’s how you do it! Just add a Department rule as you like! Force the opposition to sue in court! “Judge, got any naked pictures of your wife? Want to see some?” That’s also how you do it Donald!
Me thinks the Dims aren’t wanting to actually implement this. They just want to fire up their baby killing base during an election year.
If you’re not the MURDERER you shouldn’t be forced to pay for the MURDER of little babies.....SATANIC EVIL!!
New Biden Rule Forcing Employers to Fund Abortions.
He’s going to shaft the taxpayer one way or anther with abortion costs.
This is the left trying to get an abortion win in there column they have to throw out raw meat issues to keep their insane followers engaged.
Cost of a condom $0.50/poke
Cost of birth control pills $25.00/month
Cost of an abortion $750.00
This isn’t about “reproductive rights” or “women’s healthcare”.
"Attention all employees. The Break Room will be reserved today to perform abortions. For all female and male employees desiring an abortion, a doctor will be in the Break Room, from 8:00am to 5:00pm, to perform procedures. The costs of your abortion will be covered by our insurance. Counselors will also be made available."
Right now He is not willing that any perish but that all should come to repentance, but when He decides “enough is enough!” His judgment will fall on these impenitent sinners like a ton of bricks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.