Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: levotb
For President GHW Bush to win in 1992, he would have needed 2/3 of the Perot votes. A lot of those votes were from angry Democrats instead of angry Republicans. Even if they had split 65% Bush/35% Clinton then Clinton would have won.

However, the 2000 election was decided by the third party vote. The Naderites would have voted for Gore over Bush if they had to choose between the two and there were more than enough of them in Florida alone to push Gore over the edge.

5 posted on 05/10/2008 4:12:57 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Pray for Rattendaemmerung: the final mutually destructive battle between Obama and Hillary in Denver)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio
The Naderites are, for all practical purposes, a rump party left over from the Nazi movement of the 1930s.

Without a candidate they simply don't vote.

Frankly, they'll be out this time to vote for Obama so you might take that into consideration.

7 posted on 05/10/2008 4:17:59 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson