Posted on 03/16/2002 8:03:22 PM PST by churchillbuff
Untrue. Please provide a source for Graham making the denial of "ever saying anything negative about Jews to Nixon." Otherwise I must conclude that YOU are lying, or at least misquoting and exagerating. Here is his quoted denial which I gave the source to in my post#35. Did you even read it???
Within seconds, we have a list of the 64 relevant entries and are reading Nixon telling Haldeman that the Rev. Billy Graham "has the strong feeling that the Bible says that there are satanic Jews and that's where our problem arises."34I see your standards in a minister approach those of Bill and Hillary. Were you ever a defense attorney or spokesman for Mr. Clinton ?34 Graham has denied the quote, saying "These are not my words and this does not reflect the high view I hold for the nation of Israel and for Jewish people, many of whom are my close friends." Quoted in James M. Perry, "Book-CD Pairing is Sure to Start a Trend," San Diego Union-Tribune, June 7, 1994, p. 10.
You present a strawman arguement here, and never answered the question, a_witness. My question was, "if we had YOUR private conversations on tape, and picked out just one conversation, could we "prove" you were a bigot?"
As far as your Clinton strawman analogy, there's a difference between prejudicial comments in private conversation and historical lawbreaking and corruption. My standards are consistent. I think Graham was wrong for the comments he made as taped, but they aren't the comments you and others attribute to him. Graham apologized for his private 1972 comments. Now, its time to get over it.
When you refer to 'Jews' in you statement, are you referring to real Jews, or JINO's?
Enlighten yourself. It is in the posted article.
That would be Jews that your friends haven't killed yet.
You don't have a question. You simply want to remove the office and high calling that Mr. Graham said he was called to from the equation. You have fallen short of the mark.
Graham spoke of a Jewish "stranglehold" on the media.
What's pathetic about this Graham incident is that people have been so beaten down by political correctness that no one is bothering ask the obvious question.
Namely, why would a man of Graham's stature make such a remark about the Jews?
That can't be true.
David Duke and friends are asking (and recruiting).
In every generation the adversary has risen up against us. It is by the mercies of God that we are not consumed, and no thanks to you.
David Duke and friends are asking (and recruiting).
Another rote cliche. How typical. You know, in our few brief exchanges, I have come to expect so little of you, and you always deliver.
Your remarks don't matter. The Reverand Graham has done more to bring people to God than you and your Israeli syncophants have done or ever will do.
You make no sense, Sonny. My friends have killed no one to my knowledge (well, one or two may have killed the enemy in Vietnam, but, again, not to my knowledge). Certainly you are not referring to Americans who have armed (and continue to arm) the State of Israel with some of the most modern, hi-tech weaponry to ensure its survival amidst the mad-dogs of Islam. Nor could you possibly be referring to the American Christians who Rabbi Lapin deem to be great friends of the Jews.
Maybe you have been tricked into believing that those of us who despise phony Jews, such as Schumer and Feinstein, despise decent honorable Jews, as well. Or, maybe you are just another low-life, Christian-hating bigot.
Whatever the case, you are certainly not going to make any friends among Christians until you become a little more objective (a little less irrational.)
There were at least two posted articles tonight, one of which espoused the cause you espouse, before they were deleted by the moderators.
Perhaps Mr. Graham, by a sincere and heartfelt repentance, will lead others to God.
How many weapons do you have at home, and how do you plan to use them to take care of the Jews you despise
before the LORD God of Israel sends your soul to .... ?
Not at all. Both claim the title of Reverend and both have solicited a large amount of money over their careers. Their race and politics are different. Jackson fathered a child out of wedlock and there have been no reports of infidelity on Graham's part. Jackson was caught slurring the Jewish people and now Graham is repenting and apologizing for his bigotry of nearly 30 years ago. Comparisons are fair. You simply fear the truth because you are emotionally attached to Graham or what he symbolizes to you.
You are talking crazy. Have you been skipping your medication?
Graham's statement about there being "total Jewish domination of the media" may be factually incorrect. However, to perceive it, mistakenly or not, as being correct, and to see it as a cause for concern, if correct, is not in itself indicative of "racial and ethnic hatred".
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.