Replies

You didn't actually read Graham's statements, did you? Be honest. You just posted sarcastic witticisms desinged primarily to impugn the character of someone Because You Could. Consider the circumstances -- private conversations. Do you ever make contextually-dependendent shorthand references to a group of people as Graham did? It's fairly obvious that the Jews he was talking about were not all Jews, and his further description of the particulars makes that plain. For the record, Graham is right. Note how quickly you get tarred for saying something that can be construed as anti-semetic, or anti-Black, but you can dog on "white boys" all day and no-one says a word. And then you suggest that this constitutes "hatred" on the part of Graham or Christians as a whole. I must say -- not only did you not read the statements of the person you maligned, but you extrapolate from them based upon left-wing stereotypes promulgated by the media.

Guys, think about this. Whose purpose does it serve, to dig up these kinds of remarks on tape in the first place? (Someone had to dig through hours and hours of Nixon's tapes). Second, why now?Let's see. Mr. Graham is approaching his end, about to pass on his legacy. The media have been agitating for years to find some way to destroy his credibility, especially now when he has links to Bush. Can you see the political gamesmanship here? Destroy faith-based initiatives. Fracture the religious right. Sap Christian support by lieing about Christians. Stab a man as he nears death. Scorched earth tactics, 101...