Why must you mention "black."
Do you believe "blacks" are essential to a "marxist takeover?"
[I won't insult you with the "R" question although those who oppose us wouldn't hesitate!]
Nor does anything here have any connection with natives of the mountain regions of South Eastern Europe, on Azerbaijan, Armenia, Geogia and Russia!
On the other hand, though, do you not see it likely that what you call "the blacks" are being used as cover in a bigger game. The battle between barbarism and Western Judeo-Christian ["Human," that is] Civilization?
For starters, [The blacks] don't have the numbers. Secondly, even the MOST diehard white Liberals, aren't going to help elect an Al Sharpton , Louis Farrahkan , Jesse Jackson , etc. president. The government doesn't yet censor/ run ALL of our media , and even rabid , white Liberal talking heads won't support the likes of the above. Will Hispanics and Asians ? Not bloody likely. They have their own agendas.
Again I find your apparent obsession with what seems for you, to be "a 'black' issue," puzzling, to say the least. Why are you confusing anything I have said in any of my posts to this thread with anything to do with what you call "the blacks?"
Now,for the crime issue / political corruption . Yes and no; criminality wasn't punished quite so well, as you seem to imagine it was, decades or even centuries ago. That is historical fact, whether you like it ( know it ) or not.
Whatever that means, you certainly would not contend I am sure, that crime was ever historically held to be the fault of its victims? Nor the pursuit of any of its perpetrators called: "rascism?"
Rashly pontificating spurious / groundless speculations, and then lambasting well thought out refutation, doesn't make your position stronger. In fact, it considerably weaks your case.
A point I trust you made whilst looking squarely into a mirror?
Detroit is a hell hole. So are other American cities. So are cities in England, France, and most other places I could waste time on typing.
Detroit and Washington DC have worse crime rates than any two cities in the Western [IE Civilized] World. There are any number of American cities, all with something in common, that are almost as bad. There are none in Britain even remotely similar insofar as rates of crime are concerned!
Does that portend the eventual copycatting of what has happened to Zimbabwe ? No, it most assurredly does not. What happened in Zimbabwe, is closer to the Stalinist USSSR , than it is to other places. It has wiffs of Nazi tactics ; however , it is even closer to the events in South Africa, when Zimbabwe / Rhodesia was still part of that country and mfecane / difaquani,tribal wars , treks , and black nation building were all going on. That never happened in America, amongst blacks. Canada, Mexico, and Cuba aren't going to step in , as Lybia,Cuba, South Africa, etc. has , in Zimbabwe , should your scenario even have a distant glimmer of a possibility here.
I give up on that! That's incoherent and, once again, you seem obsessed with the idea that what you call "blacks" are at the heart of what we are discussing here.
Do me a favor of reading my posts # 34, 36, 48, 51, 54 and [Ignore my "rant" reference] 60 -- and tell me where I have talked about this being about "blacks."
And then re-read your post # 49, in which you correctly assessed my contribution to this thread.
To summarise what I have said here, you will notice that I am more concerned by far with Kaddaffi's part in the Rhodesia situation than with Mugabe's, with Khaddaffi's and his co-islamanazis and the part played by Russia's totalitarians in South Africa than with the thieving bastards associated with Mandella's mob.
And far more concerned with the part being played in the attacks on America by the feral-gummint's Immigration and Nauralization Service -- than I am concerned about "the blacks" upon whom you seem so fixated!
All of that said, however [And notwithstanding your occasional vehement scolding] -- I reckon that your heart is in the Right place, that we are on the same side and that given you seem to be quite a quick study, there is much hope for you!
Take care -- Be safe -- Be well -- Be happy -- B A <];^)~<
Why do I keep talking about one certain race ? What race are Mugabe, Mbeki, and Obasanjo ? What race are those who are responsible for the deterioration of Detroit ? What race is Marion Berry ? What race employs such tactics as necklacing ? Did Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, and Lenin necklace the opposition ?
Far more than Marxism / Socialism / Communism is at work in Africa. Whether you want to ignore it or not, tribalism and ancient blood fueds are in this mix. We don't have that in the USA. If you want to say that America is at risk for a Commie like take over, then say so. Don't say that what has happened in South Africa , Zimbabwe, Nigeria, etc., is a roadmap, for what might happen here. Words mean things. Those of you, who say that today's events, in Africa, is a foreshadowing of what could / will happen in the USA, is far fetched ! It is just as patently ridiculous, as those who keep typing that all whites should leave, and haven't an iota of an idea, that that is far and away, an almost impossibility.
Brian, you apparently haven't any knowledge of actual criminal history, in earlier times, in America. This country wasn't an Eden, where all was milk and honey. There were gangs, there was political crime / fraud that went unpunished, and it was just as bad, as those things are today ! Is Washington D.C. and Detroit and L.A. totally lawless ? No. Is crime very bad there ? Yes. Was it always this bad, in those places ? Probably not, but it was in other places, in other times. And, dear, THAT was my point.
With so many things to worry about and pay attention to, let's no fight about " maybes", " perhaps ", and " might " ; especially not when your crystal ball has a crack in it. : - )