The article seems to focus on “paper mills” where very flawed papers get published. It doesn’t mention the many papers that are written by “worthy scientists” where the results are subtly tweaked to match the prevailing beliefs so as to get funding. Climate “science” would fit into this category.
I worked in maintenance at a paper mill for a couple of summers after high school. One fellow got chewed up in the log chipper. (Fortunately the bleach got rid of the red color.)
I’m 69 and I still have a slingshot, though I’m way out of practice. Used to be pretty good with one, many years ago. Never shot any windows or windshields, though.
I'm 75 and have one. Really hard now with my shoulder. Pellet guns are much easier to shoot when plinking in the back yard.
I was at an outdoor store and gun shop in Maine a few years ago and the ladies room line was so long they took en mass to the men’s room. My wife was one of those.
Many many years ago my uncle was an AF pilot. He had a passenger in his 2 seat jet and the plane developed problems. He got the passenger out and went down with the plane. He didn’t survive.
I have several machines on Win 7. For two uses (gov't related) I have Win 10. These may be upgradable but have not checked. I use Linux for most stuff.
I think the “solar oven” that Edmund Scientific sold decades ago could easily reach 1000 C at the focal point of its Fresnel lens. Anyway, hard to imagine a steel mill that only works in the daytime on sunny days. 8 hr startup time and then shut down for the night.
My vote is still for oil, coal, nuclear reactors and deep geothermal. Fusion maybe someday. Plenty of valid options without wind/solar crap.