Posted on 07/03/2020 1:29:58 AM PDT by Viking2002
H.L. Mencken, a contrarian polemicist and the consummate critic, who wrote prolifically and prodigiously from 1899 until 1948, may no longer seem relevant, but the fault would not be his.
Mencken was a well-read bon vivant with a taste for Teutonic philosophy and a fidelity to immutable truth. He was also a brilliant satirist and a writer whose facility with the English idiom and grasp of intellectual history are unsurpassed.
How can a phenom like Mencken appeal in our age, The Age of the Idiot?
He cant: He should, but he cant.
Henry Louis Mencken cannot appeal to the bumper crops of humorless, dour dunderheads America is now siring. He cannot resonate with those who are afraid to question received opinion, who cannot conjugate a verb correctly, use tenses, prepositions and adjectives grammatically and creatively, or appreciate a clever turn-of-phrase.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I would almost mandate all of the 30-plus books that he wrote...be read by first-year college students. Absolute skeptic on any good will or achievements ever coming out of Washington DC. Graduated high school at 15. Just all-round knowledge in everything.
One can spend years of enjoyment reading Mencken. Imagine a journalist and commentator who cannot be bought, a brilliant researcher and analyst of politics, psychology, and was also in his heyday both America's most read pundit and leading literary critic.
I have two Mencken collections in my library:
• The Impossible H. L. Mencken, edited by Marion E. Rodgers
• H. L. Mencken's Smart Set Criticism, edited by William H. Nolte
Two days ago I commented on a remarkable piece of Menken analysis on the kind of person who runs for the Presidency.
And just now I read your FR profile where you pinpointed the very same essay :- )
Here’s the Presidency essay of Mencken in abridged form.
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3860562/posts?page=28#28
“The Age of the Idiot? ...the bumper crops of humorless, dour dunderheads America is now siring”
The writer is perfectly describing the current set of journalist in the media today. Think CNN, MSNBC, New York Times. Imbeciles.
If he'd be around today, he certainly would be detested by the establishments of both political parties and probably would be reluctant to support any politician. It's refreshing to have people who think for themselves rather than falling into groupthink, whether you agree with them on any particular issue or not.
We don't seem to have very many such people in public life. Who in your opinion comes closest to filling this contrarian niche today?
BUMP
One of those rare gems that comes once in a lifetime, maybe a century.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.