I have no idea who the forger is. But it’s a pretty lousy job. It didn’t take more than a day for numerous people to find problems with it. It must have been put together in a hurry.
Kind of typical of Obama to wait three years and then order a rush job done on it. Just like he handled the Afghan surge.
IMHO, this is all perfectly consistent with how zero runs things(when he actually does stuff himself, probably not too often). He is arrogant and his handlers have already thought all this through. They know exactly what they will say when it is found to be a forgery.
They will turn it all around on us and try and make us look foolish. It's worked so far but he can't skate on lies forever. Sooner or later the truth will eek out.
I don't know why this is so hard to believe. It's all perfectly consistent with their MO. These people,the regime, lie all the time. They never ever tell the truth about anything and everything has two or three meanings.
Not really. Donald Trump came out of nowhere shooting from the hips!
Corsi's book became an instant #1 on Amazon.com long before it was out for sale and the usurper's polls went tanking downhill faster than a fast ball and suddenly a faked b.c. surfaced like Hillary's long waiting for billing records in the W.H.!!
Then they staged a "Wag-the-Dog" movie look-a-like raid just to get a wrong OBL, the owner of the "Mansion"(?) and throw HIM out to the sharks for us NOT to see. All this staged to increase the poll numbers for 2012!!!
Magnify anything enough and it starts to look strange. Maybe you remember when you were a kid and looked at newspaper illustrations under a magnifying glass. It was all little dots that had little relationship to the whole picture.
So it is with computer graphics, only pixels instead of dots. Straight lines become jagged. Grays resolve into whites set against blacks. And when the computer tries to recognize characters things get even more complicated. Strange layers may appear, and for all I know, pixel sizes can vary.
I must sound terribly skeptical about all the theories, but that's usually because something sets me off. In the last round it was people saying that you couldn't get to Pakistan in 1981 on a US passport long after that was proven to be untrue, and people repeating with certainty that "Obama's grandmother" had definitely said that he was born in Kenya (which is questionable) or born in Mombasa (which is untrue), that made me skeptical of the theories -- plus all the faked Kenyan birth certificates.
This time, it was people saying that the document had to be forged because one of the signatures was in felt-tip pen and those either weren't invented or weren't in common use in 1961. Whoever said that had apparently not used a fountain pen recently (or ever).
So yes, the document may be a forgery, but no, nobody's yet proved that it was. You'd have to get a closer look at the actual document, not at the PDF or GIF or whatever the computer image is. Otherwise, it's like looking at those little dots in a newspaper photograph and concluding from them that a picture was faked: very easy to believe, but hard to prove.