There's nothing factually incorrect about the part of the article I was quoting. Even the Blaze article you posted quotes the family's lawyer admitting that Progressive wasn't representing the defendant, which is the point I was making.
He goes on to say, "Progressive did everything in their power to show that their own insured did something wrong." Well, yes. Isn't this what they would have done if the family was able to sue them directly? Surely, it's not an ideal situation for them to have to do this at the trial of the driver in the accident, but that's the way the law is set up. Progressive couldn't have defended their position any other way.
You are pretty daft...FR used to have people that could actually read and not be influenced by propaganda.
Scroll down at the actual court records:
Jeffrey Moffet attorney for Progressive on defense team.