Posted on 09/03/2012 6:14:52 AM PDT by opentalk
OK, that accounts for $20 million of the $16 trillion. Did 799,999 more optometrists open offices or where did the rest of the money go?
Actually 20 Billion. They had Citibank on there for $2.5 Trillion in loans. They probably have an average of $10 billion a day for 250 days. There were other big banks that had similar large numbers. No bank has any where near the numbers in that report.
USAA is underwritten/financed by the Bank of China. Maybe that is the reason;)
I hadn’t heard that. Can you substantiate that claim? Do you have a reference, for example?
I see no one countered your specificity, kabar.
So the question is [I guess], how much loan money was defaulted? And I’m asking around: does the Fed get freshly printed currency? Or is it involved in quantitative easing?
Part of kabar’s post 24:
“Concurrent with the announcement of TAF, the FOMC announced the establishment of dollar swap arrangements with two foreign central banksto address similar disruptions in dollar funding markets abroad. In a typical swap line transaction, FRBNY exchanged dollars for the foreign central bank’s currency at the prevailing exchange rate, and the foreign central bank agreed to buy back its currency (to “unwind” the exchange) at this same exchange rate at an agreed upon future date (for a more detailed explanation, see app. IX).”
There were no losses by the Fed given the swap arrangements. They just hold the foreign currency and can exchange it back at the fixed rate it provided the dollars.
“No bank has any where near the numbers in that report.”
I read that in an earlier thread. I do notice that critics of the 16 trillion threads tend to offer more specifics, not that I understand them.
That’s the problem. People who understand the Fed have a lexicon beyond tpyical comprehension, although typical people are that much more suspicious.
OK, thank you for your quick response! Right, so there could be devaluation, but nothing like Weimar Republic deval [I hope]. Is this a kind of ‘lifeline’ contingency to replace a degraded currency with US dollars?
No devaluation in terms of currency rate changes. That rate is fixed at the same rate as the date of the transaction. Eventually, the borrowing country will buy back its own currency using dollars. Much of it has already been purchased back by the borrowing countries.
“... rate is fixed ...”
Paid back with the same US dollars you mean? We swap one million [for example] for thirty million wooden nickels. And they take back thirty million wooden nickles for one million US dollars? So they have the option to default during a complete currency meltdown and cut some kind of other deal then, such as replacing their worthless currency with Greenbacks and absorbing enough US dollars that we don’t suffer from inflation. Is that about how it works?
[Creepy having this gang of crooks in charge right now. The opportunities for chicanery ...]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.