Skip to comments.Dem. Jerrold Nadler: "2 to 4 self-defense shots are enough," he's a jackass--Period
Posted on 01/17/2013 9:00:04 AM PST by Oldpuppymax
For liberals facts are never really important. Truth to liberals like Democrat New York City Congressman Jerrold Nadler is what he feels it is. Nadler has said: Hunters dont use large ammunition clips, and as far as self- defense, I mean who are you defending yourself against? If youre defending yourself against a robber two or three or four shots should be enoughperiod.
Its a safe bet Nadler has never faced an assailant fueled by adrenalin drugs and alcohol. That doesnt matter, of course, since no one will ever challenge Nadler on his supposed knowledge of the danger presented by people who are psychotic and drunk period.
The period at the end of Nadlers pronouncement is the classic liberal dismissal of anyone daring to disagree with...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
In his case, he may be right.
I figure it’d take a .375 H&H Magnum to bring down that hippo.
Two shots, you heard me you stupid private sector morons!
We in government know what's good for you tax paying peons and you'll do what the hell your told!
Don't like it? Too damn bad!
We are defending ourselved from YOU, you self-righteous SOB.
But ... what if the guy who was attacking my basic right to life (or some other basic right) were incredibly fat? I mean: huge. I mean — nearly bullet-proof due to the quantity of lard he was carrying? Wouldn’t I want to shoot that person a lot more than just 3 or 4 times? I’m just sayin’
I’m thinking, Bunker Buster, myself...
Then matbe Obama ought to sign an EO limiting all federal personnel authorized to carry a gun limiting them to 4 rounds.
Has anyone done any research on the average shots fired in a home self-defense situation? That should help towards settling this.
The only thing close to this I’ve seen, are the articles in the beginning of each ‘American Rifleman’ magazine on citizens defending themselves. None of them involve more than a few shots being fired by the defenders.
Well, it's a good thing NY passed a law that only groups of 4 or less can assault people.
Otherwise, this would be a completely ridiculous statement.
Unfortunately, New York will deny you the permits to own that many pistols.
Jerrold Nadler from the Ministry of Bullets with his latest directive.
Next week Mr. Nadler will tell us how many condoms we will be able to have. After a background check of course.
Nadler has never defended himself against a balogna sandwich.
WE need weapons to defend against the tyranny of a-wipes like him ,Chuck Schumer and the Resident.
People who would take away our Constitutional rights.
On May 8, 1991 two shooters ambushed Lucchese soldier Peter “Fat Pete” Chiodo at a gas station in Staten Island where he was working on a car. Chiodo received 12 bullet wounds in the arms, legs, and torso, but survived the attack.Doctors credited Chiodo’s 500 pound weight for saving his life
“Has anyone done any research on the average shots fired in a home self-defense situation? That should help towards settling this.”
It’s basically keep firing until the subject is down. Also be prepared to kill your assailant, center mass. No trick shots to the leg or so called warning shots. Those will get you killed.
The highly-trained, super cops average about a dozen per take down, while our military uses about 500,000 per kill. But for you, 2 is more than enough, because after that you deserve to die for having the audacity to arm yourself.
2 to 4 shots might be enough if you’re using an elephant gun...
If the gold standard of evaluation is to “save one life”, then we must allow for unlimited self-defense shots.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.