Luiz Mott: Homosexuals Are Eunuchs

Last Days Watchman ^ | Julio Severo

[juliosevero]

Luiz Mott: Homosexuals Are Eunuchs

“If your sexual organ causes you to sin, cut it off.”

By Julio Severo

“Homosexuals are modern eunuchs,” said Luiz Mott, considered the father of the homosexual movement in Brazil.

In what sense exactly are eunuchs and homosexuals equal, according to Mott? Did eunuchs only want men?

Luiz Mott and statue of a naked baby

Eunuchs were castrated men who worked in the palaces of some countries. Daniel, the prophet in the Bible, had been brought as a young man to the palace of Nebuchadnezzar in Babylon. There, he was castrated to work as a eunuch.

Perhaps these peoples thought, at the time, that a man castrated would be less busy with sex and free to focus on governmental affairs.

Eunuchs were also used as guards of harems. It was a role in which they were fully trusted-worthy. They could be close of the most beautiful women, even if they were stripped naked, without feeling an ounce of sexual attraction.

Eunuchs neither have sex nor sexual desires. They don’t occupy their time and minds with sexual interests.

Then, it is not known why Mott compared homosexuals to eunuchs. Men addicted to homosexual practices occupy their time and minds in anal and fecal lewdness. Different from a eunuch, they are unable to be in front of another man without having lewd thoughts. In the case of Mott, he has said that he has had sex with over 500 men.

Almost all the problems of the addicted homosexual revolve around his addiction. If he were a eunuch, he would certainly have a much more peaceful life: without orgies, with unknown homosexual men, in dirty public restrooms; without pornography; without diseases that accompany fecal sex; without the constant pursuit of pleasures in gay bars; without exposure to risks in zones of homosexual prostitution and without the vices of alcohol and drugs that often accompany the vices of fecal sex. And without the danger of suffering aggression and murder by gay lovers.

Although the comparison of Mott is unreal, is it impossible for a man addicted to homosexuality to be a eunuch? Of course not.

Everything that he would need is an operation of castration.

I can hear some politically correct voices saying, “Oh, what horror! Cut our sex? This is unethical, it is against the Bible, it is a crime, it is insanity, it is animalistic, it is wild!”

Do you hear the same hysterical cry when a homosexual activist, in a TV talk-show, calmly advocates that men addicted to homosexuality should have a sugary right to “sex change”?

This change involves much more than just castration. It involves mutilation, disfiguration and perversion of sexual organs. It is a sacrifice for the sake of perversion.

But did you know that there are sacrifices that can be made for the sake of the Kingdom of God? These sacrifices move you away from the sin and vice of a specific perversion. Jesus said,

“And if your hand causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life crippled than with two hands to go to hell, to the unquenchable fire.  And if your foot causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life lame than with two feet to be thrown into hell.  And if your eye causes you to sin, tear it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom of God with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into hell, ‘where their worm does not die and the fire is not quenched.’” (Mark 9:43-48 ESV)

“You can’t do this that Jesus told. This is crazy!” shout many. Shout it to gay militants who require expensive operations of sexual mutilation, for the sake of perversion, funded by Brazilian tax-payers.

To remove a sexual organ as a sacrifice against sin is better than to mutilate it to dive into sin. This is a helpful advice to the followers of Luiz Mott. If the father of their movement believes that those addicted to homosexuality would be best as eunuchs, I just agree.

In the case of Mott, the problem is much more complex. He has been accused of defending pedophilia. There is even an indecent video produced by Mott in which he, almost embraced to the statue of a naked baby, exalts the “wonders” of an erotic museum. If the charges against him are proved, this is not a case for castration.

Castration is for those who feel strong desires for sins, but have not yet come to commit acts of pedophilia or prostitution. For a man who rapes children, the Bible prescribes heavy sentences.

I want to make it clear publicly that I support the pretension of Mott that those addicted to homosexuality are entitled to be eunuchs. Better this than to get to the point of defending and practicing pedophilia. I just cannot afford to pay for their operations of castration, but I invite everybody to help Mott and his followers on this noble pretension.

My piece of advice then, following the suggestion of Mott that homosexuals should be eunuchs and following the pretension of many gay militants who require the Brazilian population to pay expensive operations of sexual mutilation, is castration.

It is a strong advice because the consequences are much stronger. Homosexuals, with other serious sinners, are prevented by determination of God from entering into the Kingdom of God:

“Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.” (1 Corinthians 6:9-10 ESV)

However, the next verse makes it clear that some people who had these aberrant practices had abandoned them. “And such were some of you. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.” (1 Corinthians 6:11 ESV)

Jesus delivers us from all sins. But sometimes some sacrifice may be necessary.

If people in sin can make great sacrifices for the sake of their sin, including mutilation and perversion of their sexual organs, why could not they follow the eunuch idea suggested by Mott?

The warnings of God for homosexuals are that their vice closes the door to enter the Kingdom of God.

In contrast, God has a special affection for eunuchs:

“Let not… the eunuch say, “Behold, I am a dry tree.” For thus says the LORD: “To the eunuchs who… choose the things that please me and hold fast my covenant, I will give in my house and within my walls a monument and a name better than sons and daughters; I will give them an everlasting name that shall not be cut off.” (Isaiah 56:3-5 ESV)

Another version is even clearer:

“’Make sure… no physically mutilated person is ever made to think, ‘I’m damaged goods. I don’t really belong.’ For GOD says: ‘To the mutilated who… choose what delights me and keep a firm grip on my covenant, I’ll provide them an honored place in my family and within my city, even more honored than that of sons and daughters. I’ll confer permanent honors on them that will never be revoked.’” (Isaiah 56:3-5 The Message)

Daniel is a beautiful example of a eunuch blessed by God! Today, he is in the Kingdom of God. On earth, he lived as a eunuch — a sober, pleasant and faithful life to God.

Mott wants homosexuals as eunuchs, but gay activists propose sexual mutilation to sin more and more. The proposal of Jesus is mutilation of a sex organ to stop sinning.

With their sexual organs cut off, individuals who practice homosexual acts will never again make propaganda of their disgusting anal and fecal sexual practices. They will also stop their frequent persecutions of pro-family leaders that denounce the harmfulness of those practices.

In 2007 the Brazilian Association of Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transvestites and Transsexuals (ABGLT) had lodged a criminal complaint against me for “homophobia.”

The complaint was made because regularly I denounce homosexual behavior as immoral, and because I oppose the goals of the homosexual movement.

Mott rejoiced then at the news. “We are all proud of the ABGLT for filing charges against our archenemy, Julio Severo,” he was quoted as saying in a Yahoo homosexual email list. “I hope that he is condemned to perpetual imprisonment in Sodom and Gomorrah.”

Mott is the most prominent promoter of the “gay rights” agenda in Brazil and an ally of the socialist Brazilian government. He is also a promoter of the legalization of pedophilia and pederasty, a fact that I had helped to expose internationally years ago (see LifeSiteNews coverage at: http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/jul/07073011.html).

The influence of Mott has been instrumental even in the United Nations system, leading it to press Brazil to criminalize “homophobia” — which includes views contrary to homosexual practices.

With castration, his followers would lose interest in the gay agenda, including an obsessive determination to impose homosexual indoctrination on school-children.

Hopefully the followers of Mott, who still do not advocate and practice pedophilia, might cut their sexual organs in order to follow the excellent example of Daniel! The path is open, with the blessing of Jesus, who said (paraphrasing):

“And if your sexual organ causes you to sin, cut it off. It is better for you to enter life crippled than with your sexual organ to go to hell, to the unquenchable fire.” (Mark 9:43-44 ESV)

Portuguese version of this article: Luiz Mott: Homossexuais são eunucos

Spanish version of this article: Luiz Mott: Los homosexuales son eunucos

Source: www.lastdayswatchman.blogspot.com

Recommended Reading:

Luiz Mott helping UN to criminalize “homophobia” in Brazil

Luiz Mott saves Catholic Church from suffering mega pedophilia scandal

Luiz Mott, the Top Homosexual Leader in Brazil and One of the Founders of ABGLT, Posts Home Addresses of Julio Severo and Other Pro-Family Activists

Luiz Mott Under Investigation for Pedophilia

ABGLT Files “Hate” Charges Against Julio Severo and Other Brazilian Christians

[MeganC]

I fully support castrating anyone who promotes sexual activity between men and young men/boys. Except that I’d prefer for the incision to be about their necks, if you don’t mind.

[HiTech RedNeck]

This fellow is well intended, but misguided.

The warning of Christ was, in my humble opinion, intended as figurative. Even blind men can lust. So can physical eunuchs (my “fixed” tomcat is a great example of that, as the spayed female cat he kept trying to mount could vouch if she could talk). The better sense is made by taking it as figurative. It means to give up habits of sin no matter how important those habits may seem. Not the literal resources that had been used in the sin, which are neutral, and can very happily be repurposed. To illustrate that, the parable of the prodigal son does better, or perhaps the parable of the weed-choked land that is close to a curse and ends up being burned so that it will be arable in the future, or the branch that bears fruit that is cleansed (some translations say pruned) so that it may bear more fruit. And there are other parables to a similar point.

I humbly submit that the thesis of this article is, in fact, satanic. It diminishes the capability of God to be glorified.

[SoConPubbie]

Homosexuals aren’t Eunuchs.

Homosexuals are perverts who have chosen to serve themselves above God, turning themselves into an idol.

God is not pleased by this behavior, and when a man decides to continually do this over the preventing Grace of God and the Conscience that God gives every man, God gives them over to the most vile of all sins, Homosexuality.

There is nothing worse.

Read Romans Chapter 1 for the complete description of their behavior and damnable behavior.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Ummm... it’s BAD, it is a misuse of love capacity to entertain hate, but to say there is nothing worse is an overreaction. That’s not how the downward spiral in Romans 1:20ff ends; that is only one misfeature near the bottom.

[HiTech RedNeck]

And sadly there are Christians who do exhibit attitudes that are even lower in the degradation list... and they will often hurl hellfire threats at homosexuals but never be able to share the gospel with them that will actually save them.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Yet another thing to note: the promise of salvation is atomic. The working of salvation is not. In fact it won’t be complete in this mortal coil. (Unabashed Crazy Evangelical theology here. I know our Catholic friends differ and I don’t care.) And so Christians upon which the promise of salvation rests can still show bad attitudes. The pretense of perfection has ironically thrown a lot of Christian walks off from being as good as they could be on this mortal coil. Better to admit the habit of sin that you have noticed today, then “cut it off” so that you will enter more fully into the kingdom of heaven.

[Jeff Chandler]

Homosexuals Are Eunuchs

"What the?"

[donmeaker]

Eunuchs tend to live about 13 years longer than normal males, in part because of the low stress life, in part because of less risky behavior.

Homosexuals tend to die younger than normal males, due to their exposture to several diseases.

[HiTech RedNeck]

And so what of the hell? Well, hell follows us around (to the extent that God permits, intending them as trials we can use to our good by resisting the devil) and as Jesus says, it is never satisfied. It will keep burning up our spirits, our resources, as long as we consent to give them to this hell. Like heaven, hell also manifests itself in this mortal coil.

[MNDude]

Daniel was castrated??? How horrible!

[SoConPubbie]

Ummm... it’s BAD, it is a misuse of love capacity to entertain hate, but to say there is nothing worse is an overreaction. That’s not how the downward spiral in Romans 1:20ff ends; that is only one misfeature near the bottom.

Actually, I both misspoke, in one regards, and didn't give the complete message on this issue.

Homosexuality is referred to as an Abomination in the Bible, to my knowledge, there is no other sin that is given that adjective.

With regards to it being the worst, there is one that is worse, that can never be forgiven according to the scripture, and that is the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit.

[SoConPubbie]

And sadly there are Christians who do exhibit attitudes that are even lower in the degradation list... and they will often hurl hellfire threats at homosexuals but never be able to share the gospel with them that will actually save them.

Actually, that is a function of whether a man is truly saved or not.

For a Christian must be blunt and forceful in his/her denouncing of sin. It is a necessary act of love.

That being said, two people can, as you say, hurl hellfire threats at homosexuals, one out of love, and one out of self-righteousness. From the perspective of the person "hurling" those threats, one pleases God, because it is uttered in love for the sinner, and the other does not, because in essence, it is sin, since it was not uttered in love.

That being said, God, or the Holy Spirit, may use either or both, no matter the motive of the one uttering the hellfire threat, to convict the heart and mind of the homosexual on the receiving end.

The Holy Spirit, throughout history, can and will use those that we may look down on, to talk to us. Several instances in the Bible, in my life, and the lives of those I love prove this to be true.

God works in mysterious ways, his wonders to perform!

[SoConPubbie]

Homosexuality is referred to as an Abomination in the Bible, to my knowledge, there is no other sin that is given that adjective.

Furthermore, if you read to the end of the passage in Romans 1 that covers homosexuality, Paul rightly describes homosexuals as the following:

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient;

29 Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,

30 Backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31 Without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful:

32 Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.

I'm not sure, but I don't think it gets worse than this.

[SoConPubbie]

Lastly, people who truly repent, will freely, and honestly tell you that they were/are the worst of sinners (this is true repentence) because they came to know themselves as God sees them outside of His Grace.

That being said, I’ve met only a few people in my life, and they were homosexuals, that would fall into the description of vs. 28 through 32 and they are truly miserable people, and yet, going full-speed ahead to hell.

I’ve always felt that maybe God gave them over to this type of sinful “disease” in a last-ditch effort to wake them up, much like the prodigal son.

[US Navy Vet]

“Eunuchs were castrated men who worked in the palaces of some countries. Daniel, the prophet in the Bible, had been brought as a young man to the palace of Nebuchadnezzar in Babylon. There, he was castrated to work as a eunuch.” HUGE RED BS Flag on this one! PROVE IT! USE KJV only.

[SoConPubbie]

“Eunuchs were castrated men who worked in the palaces of some countries. Daniel, the prophet in the Bible, had been brought as a young man to the palace of Nebuchadnezzar in Babylon. There, he was castrated to work as a eunuch.” HUGE RED BS Flag on this one! PROVE IT! USE KJV only.

Exactly.

I've never read that before in the bible, I would also like to see the sourcing.

[Theodore R.]

Maybe it is understood that Daniel was castrated and not specifically stated.

[SoConPubbie]

Maybe it is understood that Daniel was castrated and not specifically stated.

Understood by whom and what was the context?

Otherwise, it's just heresy used by someone for their own agenda.

[juliosevero]

There is ancient evidence that Daniel was a eunuch. See Josephus:

“But now Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, took some of the most noble of the Jews that were children, and the kinsmen of Zedekiah their king, such as were remarkable for the beauty of their bodies, and the comeliness of their countenances, and delivered them into the hands of tutors, and to the improvement to be made by them. He also made some of them to be EUNUCHS . . . Now among these there were four of the family of Zedekiah, of most excellent dispositions, one of whom was called Daniel, another was called Ananias, another Misael, and the fourth Azarias; and the King of Babylon changed their names, and commanded that they should make use of other names.

Daniel he (the King) called Baltasar; Ananias, Shadrach; Misael, Meshach; and Azarias, Abednego. These the King had in esteem, and continued to love, because of the very excellent temper they were of, and because of their application to learning, and the progress they had made in wisdom.” (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, Book 10, Chapter 10, first paragraph)

See also here: