You can’t make this stuff up
My thing is Cherubs. ..
Asinine law.
I can go to any museum and see paintings of naked everything or marble statues of the same.
This guy may very well be a pervert but, he is objectifying.... well...an object.
My real thing the Venus de Milo.
Ahhhh! So beautiful! So statuesque.
And that she has no arms is just...exciting.
Nike of Prometheus? I could stare at her all day.
And David, at the Louvre. What a body.
I also have a fetish for a certain statue set atop a spire of melted cannons. So Napoleon in its likeness and right in the center of Place Vendome. Hence my nom de jeur.
Lady Justice? LOL. That babe can really balance those scales.
Dont get me started on Degas Ballerina.
It’s a sick, sick world, I tell you...
I have to say I’m against this law, as weird as this guy might be if he has naked anime children on his computer. It’s a drawing. Could he be arrested for doodling something like that?
A friend of line has made the point that, the way US law is written, if you paste the Gerber baby’s head on a Penthouse centerfold, you could be convicted of producing child porn.
Kids get suspended for drawing pictures of guns.
Someone should draw a picture of a 2 by 4 and then smack this idiot with it
Big Brother at BigGuv is busily creating more make work jobs in the sex regulatory arena - for all those fast food industry rejects which TSA refused to hire.
Draw a picture of Mohamhead in Britain and see what happens.
IIRC, that’s been litigated in the US. No-go. Artists’ conceptions do not count as kiddie porn.
there are sites that use copyrighted cartoon characters for porn, they might have Lisa and Bart going at it or Homer and Bart.
I don’t see why the copyright holders would allow this.
He should’ve said he was a Muslim.