Posted on 10/27/2014 9:31:23 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Recent news that Lockheed Martin has made a nuclear fusion breakthrough has come with its fair share of sensational headlines. Claims have been made that it could change the world and forever alter the future of humanity. And for once, those headlines could be accurate, assuming that Lockheed Martin's claims are viable.
A compact nuclear fusion reactor, especially one as small as Lockheed Martin is claiming, could change the world as we know it. But before we can get a handle on what such a breakthrough could mean, let's first get a hold of what exactly is being claimed.
In the simplest of terms, nuclear fusion is what happens when two or more atoms collide at high speeds and fuse together to form a new atom. It's the same process that fuels the sun itself. By contrast, nuclear fission is when an atom is split apart. Fission is the process used in our nuclear power plants.
The advantages of fusion over fission are paramount. For one, fusion generates three to four times more energy than fission does. Most importantly, fusion doesn't produce any radioactive waste. It is, for the most part, a clean way of generating power. It is fossil fuel-free, and free of hazardous waste.
So why do we use fission as our preferred form of nuclear energy instead of fusion? Quite simply, controlling a fusion reaction has proven to be an engineering nightmare. The reaction at the heart of the process generates so much heat and pressure that containing it, especially at smaller scales, has been an elusive goal. There has also been a problem with cost efficiency. The energy produced by the reaction is often less than the energy it takes to generate it in the first place.
The fact that Lockheed Martin claims to have overcome these obstacles, and with a reactor small enough to fit on the back of a truck, is a big deal. Even more impressive, the team expects to test their design within a year, and build a prototype in just five years time.
"Our compact fusion concept combines several alternative magnetic confinement approaches, taking the best parts of each, and offers a 90 percent size reduction over previous concepts," said Tom McGuire, lead fusion researcher on the project, according to Lockheed Martin's news release. “The smaller size will allow us to design, build and test the CFR in less than a year.”
Because the news release contains so few details, scientists have been skeptical about the claims. But assuming Lockheed Martin's design is viable, the world may truly never be the same once this technology is put into production. Here are just a few of the monumental impacts that this breakthrough could have:
A solution to climate change
Since nuclear fusion is such a powerful way to generate energy, and since a fusion reactor can potentially be so compact, it could eventually replace all other forms of energy production anywhere in the world. That would mean that generating energy from fossil fuels would no longer be necessary. In fact, just one kilogram of fusion fuel can provide the same amount of energy as 10 million kilograms of fossil fuel. So the planet's electricity production could be entirely carbon neutral.
Clean and safe
Unlike the nuclear fission in modern day reactors, fusion is much safer. Since no radioactive waste is produced, the dangers of a meltdown are non-existent. There is also no danger of fusion going into a runaway reaction.
More expansive space flight
Engines fueled by fusion will radically transform our ability to explore space. For instance, fusion could make it possible to travel to Mars in a month, instead of the six months currently projected for flight to the red planet.
Limitless fuel
Fusion also provides a virtually limitless supply of fuel. It can be produced using seawater as an input, which means we can get all the fuel we need from the ocean, rather than having to drill for more limited sources, as we do with oil. Fusion could end most of the world's strife that revolves around limited resource extraction. Because the fuel supply is nearly limitless, this also means that fusion power could potentially be dirt cheap.
Basically, fusion energy is powerful, plentiful, cheap and clean. There is no end to the ways such an energy source could radically transform the world. But, of course, this all depends on the viability of Lockheed Martin's claims. We shall have to await more details about the company's design before we can know for sure.
If its real, it’ll be attacked. Its not about clean energy, its about destroying humanity.
The Earth will run out of hydrogen.
It will turn into helium and escape into space.
The Earth will lose mass.
It will go out of its orbit.
Everything will die.
Stop fusion now.
What’s your time frame for all of this?
I’d love to see their preliminary design ideas for the magnetic containment.
Is that you Al Gore? :)
Fusion is racist.
We have to stop this now before it's too late!
For all pie in the sky inventions it is always 5 to 10 years. :)
...
[ The Earth will run out of hydrogen.
It will turn into helium and escape into space.
The Earth will lose mass.
It will go out of its orbit.
Everything will die.
Stop fusion now. ]
The sun would have burned out, turned into a white dwarf and then cooled into a black dwarf BEFORE THAT could ever HAPPEN...
Several TRILLION YEARS!
That is a very short time compared to how long the sarcasm of his post will endure.
LOL!
Seriously, when I was majoring in Nuclear Engineering in the early 70’s fusion was anticipated to be technically viable no less than 20-30 years into the future. As far as I can see, it’s still the same story. [shrugs]
Practical fusion energy has been 30 years away for at least the last 40 years.
Much more practical, available now, tested and proven; nuclear power from thorium fueled reactors.
No mention of cost, of course.
Fusion will not replace hydrocarbon energy if it costs multiples more to produce.
But, silly me, cost-benefit analysis is obsolete in today’s unlimited borrow & spend world!
There is $32 billion in the Nuclear Waste Disposal Fund, the money paid in by electric consumers.
Currently, 64,000 tons of waste are stored at various US nuke plants.
Only 5 percent of the energy in nuclear fuel rods is extracted. 95 percent is considered waste...
Betcha the EPA already has their crack number one team plotting against fusion.
This is a nightmare for them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.