Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Two Step and recusal refusal at Supreme Court
Coach is Right ^ | 6/28/15 | Suzanne Eovaldi

Posted on 06/28/2015 8:44:00 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax

This week’s Supreme Court decision in regard to legitimacy of homosexual marriage just well may be illegitimate itself whatever way the Court decides. And because of this very fact, 2016 and its crucial election must include initiatives to institute TERM LIMITS for SCOTUS along with a swift and very definitive process for removal of any member of the U.S. Supreme Court!

Just consider the fact that their rabid feminism pushed both Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Elena Kagan to “marry” two same-sex couples though they knew full well they were being called upon to give definitive judgment in the Obergefell case. Also, “Justice Ginsburg had gone so far as to strongly suggest in public that the time for same-sex marriage had arrived.” (1) Both female judges are insulting America’s highest legal authority, insulting ethical restraint in regards to conflict of interest, insulting the American family and, in fact, insulting the basis of our country’s rule-of-law underpinnings.

This final step in the use of historicity to re-write our constitutional laws and legal process is a step that must be called out now. “If it didn’t happen that way, then it should have,” said an Afro-American teacher to me one day. She was referring to something that happened in the race-relations controversy and historical milieu in our country. In other words, she wanted the laws re-written the way she wanted them written and she wanted it done NOW.

Well, this version of Ginsburg-Kagan historicity is beyond anything the lib/Dem bulldozer through America has done so far. Their rabid hubris and out-of-control feminism have taken our country to a whole new level that in no way is America. But what is shaping up to be another slap in the face of honest rule-of-law has to do with how court employees manipulate...

(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: 2016election; election2016; homosexualagenda; homosexualmarriage; homosexuals; justiceginsberg; justicekagan; libertarians; medicalmarijuana; obamanation; tedcruz; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 06/28/2015 8:44:00 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax
It's a kangaroo court.

The supreme kangaroo court.

2 posted on 06/28/2015 8:50:45 AM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax

I’m not sure there is a need to set term limits on Justices of the Supreme Court...I cannot find a way, at this time to wrap around that idea...

But, I do recall there is a way to replace Justices by impeachment...

How that works, is up to the spines of those we actually do have methods of disposal for, those we elect to office, and thus the preferred method, in my opinion, the best way is to vote them out...That’s their term limit provision...


3 posted on 06/28/2015 8:50:50 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (I will settle for a "perfectly good, gently used" kidney...Apply within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

Stevie, yes, I thought there was a way to impeach judges too. Need to do some homework.


4 posted on 06/28/2015 8:56:30 AM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

Get ready to hear “you don’t have standing” repeated ad-infinitum.


5 posted on 06/28/2015 8:59:44 AM PDT by Neidermeyer ("Our courts should not be collection agencies for crooks." — John Waihee, Governor of Hawaii, 1986-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

Federal judges are subject to the same degree of offenses as all federal officials, but to a somewhat higher degree. That Includes SCOTUS. The Senate has removed judges from office for substantial questionable conduct, even if no crime was committed.

But, Republican legislators in office now dont have the guts to do it.

Alcee Hastings was a Florida Federal Judge who was impeached and kicked off the bench for taking BRIBES.

He has been contually rewarded by Democrats by election and reelection to the House


6 posted on 06/28/2015 9:06:11 AM PDT by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla; Neidermeyer

I hear you both, but we have to do something. And, of course weigh the most effective actions against the lesser.

Something to think about. But, not for long. Our nation does not have much time left.


7 posted on 06/28/2015 9:13:35 AM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

His election is “In yo face Mo Fo!”


8 posted on 06/28/2015 9:13:47 AM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64

Are you kidding?

Congress won’t even limit the appellate jurisdiction of USSC, which they have clear authority to do, by simple majority vote.


9 posted on 06/28/2015 9:16:41 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stevie_d_64; Oldpuppymax

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3304160/posts


10 posted on 06/28/2015 9:18:17 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V (LOVE ME MY TEDDY C!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I’m perfectly serious, and stop calling me Shirley!

All kidding aside, I know Jim...Kinda makes you wonder why the process is limited in its operation by the very folks without the spine to actually do it these days...

Make it a constituent, or district vote/referendum to maybe just force the process, and we might see that occur more often...

Just an idea...


11 posted on 06/28/2015 9:36:17 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (I will settle for a "perfectly good, gently used" kidney...Apply within...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue; stevie_d_64

But they won’t go away, even when impeached and removed from office.

To wit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcee_Hastings


12 posted on 06/28/2015 10:03:15 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla
-- The Senate has removed judges from office for substantial questionable conduct ... --

After which said corrupt judges obtain office in Congress. Alcee Hastings.

Washington is a den of iniquity. It amazes me that anybody allows that bunch of thieves and scoundrels any say so.

13 posted on 06/28/2015 10:09:09 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

OK, and complete that thought for me, please?


14 posted on 06/28/2015 10:54:40 AM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Oldpuppymax; holdonnow
Look, this pissing and moaning over the selection of Associate Justices and the Chief Justice is misdirected.

The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.

Not, you will note, "as provided by law". It's "such regulations (not laws) as the Congress shall make".

THEREFORE

Congress can prevent the USSC from hearing ANY cases regarding benefits due to illegal aliens, capital punishment, guns, abortion, school and other community prayers, state marriage laws, state regulation of contraception, state laws pertaining to legal or illegal drugs, etc, etc.

The ONLY power the USSC has to hear these cases is power COMPLETELY AND TOTALLY UNDER THE CONTROL OF CONGRESS, end of story.

Stop with the crap about impeaching justices - that will never happen.

Their powers can be severely curtailed by a simple majority vote in both Houses of Congress - Presidential approval not required, Presidential veto not permitted.

15 posted on 06/28/2015 11:30:32 AM PDT by Jim Noble (If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue; Cboldt; Sasparilla
Hastings was removed as a Fed judge, but the Senate neglected to ban him from holding public office.

He's been a Rep from FL not quite since his removal.

Also, Hastings, a known and convicted bribee, was almost put in charge of the House Intelligence Committee by Pelosi, giving him access to lots of stuff he could sell.

He was in the news in the last month or so, drumming up support for a pay increase for Congress.

In the wikipedia entry, his convicted co-conspiring briber was pardoned on Clinton's last day in office.

A den of iniquity, indeed.

16 posted on 06/28/2015 11:41:36 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
SCOTUS can side step that. It heard and "decided" Marbury v. Madison, and denied relief on the basis that it lacked jurisdiction.

In the homo marriage case, all a court that lacks marriage jurisdiction has to do, to usurp jurisdiction, is claim that the question is a constitutional one. It hears the case to decide whether the Congressional regulation applies, and holds that it does not.

Back to square one.

17 posted on 06/28/2015 12:12:17 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
all a court that lacks marriage jurisdiction has to do, to usurp jurisdiction, is claim that the question is a constitutional one

Of course it's a Constitutional question. The Supreme Court is not granted unlimited power to hear appeals on Constitutional issues.

18 posted on 06/28/2015 12:25:05 PM PDT by Jim Noble (If you can't discriminate, you are not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
-- The Supreme Court is not granted unlimited power to hear appeals on Constitutional issues. --

No disagreement there, as any case can be framed in a way that implicated the constitution - see Presser fighting an Illinois parade permit ordinance on 2nd amendment grounds. My point is that SCOTUS can, if it wants, cast a case in any way it wants, there is no requirement for intellectual honesty, and what you think you've cut them out of, they will pick up anyway, and issue an order.

19 posted on 06/28/2015 12:35:13 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Calvin Locke

a...Hastings was removed as a Fed judge, but the Senate neglected to ban him from holding public office...”

The bigger the transgression, the higher in esteem liberals are held in.

I expect Governor Blagojevitch will win a Senate seat when he finishes his term
(The prison one)


20 posted on 06/28/2015 3:57:17 PM PDT by Sasparilla (If you want peace, prepare for war.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson