Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Donald Trump pay attention in class???

Posted on 04/23/2016 10:35:48 PM PDT by E=MC<sup>2</sup>

Several weeks ago Donald Trump suggested that he would eliminate the national debt over an 8 year time period by selling off federal assets at the rate of $2.25 trillion per year. Should a graduate of Wharton School and a real estate mogul say such a thing? Supply and demand are the most basic economic principles and are taught in Economics 101. Shouldn't such a well educated individual and one who has created an amazing awesome $10 billion (trillion? quadrillion? quintillion?) company based on real estate know that dumping that much additional real estate on the open markets would depress them and they would have to sell at much below book value? And just who is going to have the money in the first place to purchase these additional assets? The dreaded Chinese??? Sheesh. Well, at least the awesome amazing Trump has recently informed us that it was just a suggestion or a joke proposal. What a leader!!!


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2016election; anotherzombieposter; braininjury; danielgabrielatwork; election2016; electionreanimation; newyork; presidentdonaldtrump; thetrollingcontinues; trump; zombievanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

1 posted on 04/23/2016 10:35:48 PM PDT by E=MC<sup>2</sup>
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>

He shouldn’t be held accountable for anything he says.


2 posted on 04/23/2016 10:40:10 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>

It was a dumb idea when the late Harry Browne, the former libertarian presidential candidate, was touting it.


3 posted on 04/23/2016 10:40:33 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>

Are you going to spend the next 9 years trashing Trump here?


4 posted on 04/23/2016 10:44:52 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>
Making inaccurate deductions from intentional misinterpretations. It don't get more NeverTrump than that. Here's a reality check, Rosie:


5 posted on 04/23/2016 10:45:13 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (It's them or us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
.. Are you going to spend the next 9 years trashing Trump here? ..

Probably.

But isn't it comforting that they're so bad at doing it?

6 posted on 04/23/2016 10:47:32 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (It's them or us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>

The government owns hundreds of buildings it no longer uses. Example; The old post office building in Washington, D.C. sold to Trump. Hundreds, if not thousands of smll, medium, and large buildings are owned by the government but should be put on the market. The same goes for land. Putting those parcels back in the private sector puts them back on the tax rolls which benefits the communities.
That’s just one instance of wise divesting which should be insisted upon. Maintaining those assets also costs the taxpayers to keep them up. Another reduction in government costs to we the taxpayer when we divest them to private ownership.


7 posted on 04/23/2016 10:47:41 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Until mom cuts the internet connection off to the basement.


8 posted on 04/23/2016 10:48:22 PM PDT by gg188 (Ted Cruz, R - Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>

Author fell for a timeworn sales technique, to get the customer to “look past the sale”.

In this case, the sale was the idea that the national debt has to be seriously addressed. Now, instead of arguing that the debt is not a problem (as too many do), he is arguing about what the right way to do it is.

Sale made - even the customer accepts that the issue should be addressed and the only question is how.


9 posted on 04/23/2016 10:53:18 PM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie; nopardons

Never argue the point but attack the person making it.
And by the way, tariffs are poor economic policy too.


10 posted on 04/23/2016 10:58:21 PM PDT by outofsalt ( I identify as a Cruz supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie
This conspiracy theory, while worthy of research, particularly in light of Rafael Junior's sketchy life, and the similarity in Obama (a foreign national with no allegiance to the USA) to Rafael the Younger (a foreign national with no allegiance to the USA)....both fathers communist (and Rafael the Elder traveled back and forth between Cuba and Texas raising money for Castro---now how do you have that kind of ability to travel between those two countries in that tumultuous time?)...both fathers alcoholic, both fathers ABANDONED THEIR FAMILIES, and both Obama and Rafael the Junior were smuggled illegally into the USA...

Both have sealed college documents. It's a question mark for both Obama and Rafael the younger as to how in hell did they afford Ivy League undergraduate and then graduate school--who paid for it.

Both follow pure Globalist policies seeking open borders, dissolution of USA sovereignty...

For those reasons, it's worth investigating as part of a Manchurian Candidate situation in TWO CONSECUTIVE presidential candidates.

Beyond that, Cruz will fade into relatively obscurity as a soldier, but not a general, in the army that is Globalism.

AND IF AMERICANS REFUSE to consider as POTUS candidate anyone who is foreign born, this all becomes moot.

11 posted on 04/23/2016 10:58:34 PM PDT by gg188 (Ted Cruz, R - Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>
Trump suggested that he would eliminate the national debt over an 8 year time period by selling off federal assets at the rate of $2.25 trillion per year.

Don't those "federal assets" belong to the American taxpayer?

12 posted on 04/23/2016 10:59:51 PM PDT by Slyfox (When someone tells it like it is, is it the truth?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>

Did YOU pay attention to Jim’s most recent thread?

JR couldn’t have stated it more clearly than he did.

Unite behind DJT or TAKE IT ELSEWHERE.


13 posted on 04/23/2016 11:00:46 PM PDT by Right-wing Librarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>

How many Billions you have made ???


14 posted on 04/23/2016 11:03:17 PM PDT by jennychase ( Vote Trump Or get Ready for President Hillary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>

I have Yosemite for $1.3 Billon.
Do I hear $1.4 Biillion?
I have Yosemite for $1.4 Billion.
Do I hear ...


15 posted on 04/23/2016 11:07:18 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Are you going to spend the next 9 years trashing Trump here?

Two month’s should be sufficient, mean while PT Trump can tell you all about raising taxes,reforming the GOP platform on Abortion, considering what an aggressive, savvy (classy) business man Trump is i wouldn’t be surprised if he’s starting a costume and tour business highlighting sidewalk washroom facilities in NYC.


16 posted on 04/23/2016 11:07:57 PM PDT by heshtesh ((New Yorker for Cruz))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E=MC<sup>2</sup>

>> Several weeks ago Donald Trump suggested

>> Trump has recently informed us that it was just a suggestion

You got him real good.


17 posted on 04/23/2016 11:13:09 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gg188
.. for those reasons, it's worth investigating as part of a Manchurian Candidate situation in TWO CONSECUTIVE presidential candidates ..

No it's not. Okay?

These fantasies that the candidate threatening the one you prefer are both juvenile and dangerous. Cruz is not a sexaholic. His father was not Oswald's BFF. Trump is not a closet Dem and he doesn't support transvestites in kids' bathrooms. The motivation behind these conspiracy theories is always the same - to puff up the ego of those promoting them. No, you haven't uncovered some deep secret about a candidate. No, the candidate - who has been subjected to intense and malicious media scrutiny for decades - is not able to buy off or threaten those who want to expose him. The only time career busting secrets are kept secret is when their revelation would embarrass the media's narrative. Think Tiger Woods.

18 posted on 04/23/2016 11:16:39 PM PDT by Byron_the_Aussie (It's them or us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Byron_the_Aussie; nopardons

I beg to respectfully differ Byron

Jim Thompson has been clear in his current zots and promised future ones

If you proclaim today you will sit out or work against Trump when he gets the nomination in any event you can be zotted now

If you are mute now but start working against Trump when he is facing Hillary man to man after June then you will be zotted for that offense

It may be amiable parting

Or suicide like Big Un or C Edmund Wright

Or someone can really piss him off

He keeps these sorts of promises is my experience

They will not allow the rampant Trump bashing further after a certain point

The brass here actually like Trump ....it’s been a long time any of us have had an opportunity to support someone we like and agree with more often than not

It’s nice


19 posted on 04/23/2016 11:26:48 PM PDT by wardaddy (gonna need a lot of rope and lamposts and gibbets after this primary season.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mollypitcher1

The government has many properties that were newly built for office space, warehouse space...that have never been occupied, just sitting. Many others that were occupied and now are not. One of our TV news guys did a special report of unused federal government property in our state alone and it was staggering.

When people hear selling government land they think oh no the Grand Canyon, or picturesque nature places that people enjoy. The government owns tons of properties that are just property. Land, homes, business space in or near cities. Acres and acres of land in the middle of nowhere, etc.

Another thought, some of the issues with ranchers could be settled by selling land to some of these ranchers that already own water, grazing rights, improvements.


20 posted on 04/23/2016 11:29:24 PM PDT by Tammy8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson