Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shades of Cold War: DNC fabricated Russian hacker conspiracy to deflect blame for its email scandal
Salon ^ | July 25, 2016 | Patrick Lawrence, foreign affairs columnist

Posted on 07/27/2016 12:08:59 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Leaked revelations of the DNC's latest misconduct bear a disturbing resemblance to Cold War red-baiting

Now wait a minute, all you upper-case “D” Democrats. A flood light suddenly shines on your party apparatus, revealing its grossly corrupt machinations to fix the primary process and sink the Sanders campaign, and within a day you are on about the evil Russians having hacked into your computers to sabotage our elections — on behalf of Donald Trump, no less?

Is this a joke? Are you kidding? Is nothing beneath your dignity? Is this how lowly you rate the intelligence of American voters? My answers to these, in order: yes, but the kind one cannot laugh at; no, we’re not kidding; no, we will do anything, and yes, we have no regard whatsoever for Americans so long as we can connive them out of their votes every four years.

Clowns. Subversives. Do you know who you remind me of? I will tell you: Nixon, in his famously red-baiting campaign — a disgusting episode — against the right-thinking Helen Gahagan Douglas during his first run for the Senate, in 1950. Your political tricks are as transparent and anti-democratic as his, it is perfectly fair to say.

I confess to a heated reaction to events since last Friday among the Democrats, specifically in the Democratic National Committee. I should briefly explain these for the benefit of readers who have better things to do than watch the ever more insulting farce foisted upon us as legitimate political procedure.

The Sanders people have long charged that the DNC has had its fingers on the scale, as one of them put it the other day, in favor of Hillary Clinton’s nomination. The prints were everywhere — many those of Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who has repeatedly been accused of anti-Sanders bias. Schultz, do not forget, co-chaired Clinton’s 2008 campaign against Barack Obama. That would be enough to disqualify her as the DNC’s chair in any society that takes ethics seriously, but it is not enough in our great country. Chairwoman she has been for the past five years.

Last Friday WikiLeaks published nearly 20,000 DNC email messages providing abundant proof that Sanders and his staff were right all along. The worst of these, involving senior DNC officers, proposed Nixon-esque smears having to do with everything from ineptitude within the Sanders campaign to Sanders as a Jew in name only and an atheist by conviction.

Wasserman fell from grace on Monday. Other than this, Democrats from President Obama to Clinton and numerous others atop the party’s power structure have had nothing to say, as in nothing, about this unforgivable breach.They have, rather, been full of praise for Wasserman Schultz. Brad Marshall, the D.N.C.’s chief financial officer, now tries to deny that his Jew-baiting remark referred to Sanders. Good luck, Brad: Bernie is the only Jew in the room.

The caker came on Sunday, when Robby Mook, Clinton’s campaign manager, appeared on ABC’s “This Week” and (covering all bases) CNN’s “State of the Union” to assert that the D.N.C.’s mail was hacked “by the Russians for the purpose of helping Donald Trump.” He knows this — knows it in a matter of 24 hours — because “experts” — experts he will never name — have told him so.

Here is Mook on the CNN program. Listen carefully:

What’s disturbing to us is that experts are telling us that Russian state actors broke into the DNC, stole these emails, and other experts are now saying that Russians are releasing these emails for the purpose of helping Donald Trump.

Is that what disturbs you, Robby? Interesting. Unsubstantiated hocus-pocus, not the implications of these events for the integrity of Democratic nominations and the American political process? The latter is the more pressing topic, Robby. You are far too long on anonymous experts for my taste, Robby. And what kind of expert, now that I think of it, is able to report to you as to the intentions of Russian hackers — assuming for a sec that this concocted narrative has substance?

Making lemonade out of a lemon, the Clinton campaign now goes for a twofer. Watch as it advances the Russians-did-it thesis on the basis of nothing, then shoots the messenger, then associates Trump with its own mess — and, finally, gets to ignore the nature of its transgression (which any paying-attention person must consider grave).

Preposterous, readers. Join me, please, in having absolutely none of it. There is no “Russian actor” at the bottom of this swamp, to put my position bluntly. You will never, ever be offered persuasive evidence otherwise.

Reluctantly, I credit the Clinton campaign and the DNC with reading American paranoia well enough such that they may make this junk stick. In a clear sign the entire crowd-control machine is up and running, The New York Times had a long, unprofessional piece about Russian culprits in its Monday editions. It followed Mook’s lead faithfully: not one properly supported fact, not one identified “expert,” and more conditional verbs than you’ve had hot dinners — everything cast as “could,” “might,” “appears,” “would,” “seems,” “may.” Nothing, once again, as to the very serious implications of this affair for the American political process.

Now comes the law. The FBI just announced that it will investigate — no, not the DNC’s fraudulent practices (which surely breach statutes), but “those who pose a threat in cyberspace.” The House Intelligence Committee simultaneously promised to do (and leave undone) the same. This was announced, please note, by the ranking Democrat on the Republican-controlled committee.

Bearing many memories of the Cold War’s psychological warp — and if you are too young to remember, count your blessings — it is the invocation of the Russians that sends me over the edge. My bones grow weary at the thought of living through a 21st century variant. Halifax, anyone?

Here we come to a weird reversal of roles.

We must take the last few days’ events as a signal of what Clinton’s policy toward Russia will look like should she prevail in November. I warned in this space after the NATO summit in Warsaw earlier this month that Cold War II had just begun. Turning her party’s latest disgrace into an occasion for another round of Russophobia is mere preface, but in it you can read her commitment to the new crusade.

Trump, to make this work, must be blamed for his willingness to negotiate with Moscow. This is now among his sins. Got that? Anyone who says he will talk to the Russians has transgressed the American code. Does this not make Trump the Helen Gahagan Douglas of the piece? Does this not make Hillary Clinton more than a touch Nixonian?

I am developing nitrogen bends from watching the American political spectacle. One can hardly tell up from down. Which way for a breath of air?


TOPICS: Computers/Internet; Conspiracy; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2016dncconvention; bhorussia; conspiracy; democrats; dnc; dncleaks; russia; salon; trump; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Salon?

FULL TITLE: Shades of the Cold War: How the DNC fabricated a Russian hacker conspiracy to deflect blame for its email scandal

1 posted on 07/27/2016 12:08:59 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

When Salon calls out an obvious distraction tactic, it has to be pretty bad. Yet some of the dopey conservative websites and media are playing along and giving column space to article about Russian hacks and national security issues instead of the content of the emails.


2 posted on 07/27/2016 12:10:44 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am having a disconnect from reality. I won’t go to the site. Is there some catch to the article buried in the story.

Or is that author their token republican.I didn’t even think they had a token republican.


3 posted on 07/27/2016 12:10:55 PM PDT by RummyChick ("...Americans think Trump is running 2 help America &Hillary is running 2 help Hillary" ~Ben Shapiro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

He is being a little hard on Nixon. Turns out, Nixon and McCarthy were both right. Read the Venona Papers.


4 posted on 07/27/2016 12:11:37 PM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

5 posted on 07/27/2016 12:13:05 PM PDT by PROCON (Americans First or Terrorists First - Choose in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Shades of Cold War: DNC fabricated Russian hacker conspiracy to deflect blame for its email scandal

What? Salon is a Rat jumping off the sinking DNC Yacht?

6 posted on 07/27/2016 12:15:58 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (America, a Rule of Mob nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

And Paul Ryan, “R”-Wisconsin, just has to insert himself into the conversation and tell Russia to ‘stay out of the election’. Proving the Stupid Party really is the Republicans.


7 posted on 07/27/2016 12:16:01 PM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Shades of the Cold War: How the DNC fabricated a Russian hacker conspiracy to deflect blame for its email scandal


And in the process self described the hacking of DNC emails a critical, high priority national security threat.

Remind me again, which two people were hacked by Romainian hackers while sending emails about Libya containing mis appropriated Top Secret US Government information

8 posted on 07/27/2016 12:17:01 PM PDT by rdcbn ("There is no means of avoiding a final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Now wait a minute, all you upper-case “D” Democrats. A flood light suddenly shines on your party apparatus, revealing its grossly corrupt machinations to fix the primary process and sink the Sanders campaign, and within a day you are on about the evil Russians having hacked into your computers to sabotage our elections — on behalf of Donald Trump, no less?

Is this a joke? Are you kidding? Is nothing beneath your dignity? Is this how lowly you rate the intelligence of American voters?

From Salon. Of all places. Hell hath indeed frozen over.

9 posted on 07/27/2016 12:17:06 PM PDT by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Its not about who hacked them its about WHATS IN THEM!!!


10 posted on 07/27/2016 12:17:30 PM PDT by Don Corleone (Oil the gun, eat the cannolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

I posted the whole article.


11 posted on 07/27/2016 12:20:25 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The FBI just announced that it will investigate — no, not the DNC’s fraudulent practices (which surely breach statutes), but “those who pose a threat in cyberspace.”
12 posted on 07/27/2016 12:20:46 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A message; 2ndDivisionVet

All I can postulate is that this fellow loves Bernie more than he hates Trump.


13 posted on 07/27/2016 12:22:45 PM PDT by Genoa (Tempus fugit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Whatever they paid Comey, it must’ve been in the millions.


14 posted on 07/27/2016 12:22:56 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Let’s face it: the MSM is flailing with disastrous results because once those emails came out, they got “outed” as very close allies of the Democratic Party and has completely destroyed whatever credibility they had left (pun kind of intended here!).


15 posted on 07/27/2016 12:23:04 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's Economic Cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Surprised to read this from a Solon writer. Maybe he was a Sandernista?


16 posted on 07/27/2016 12:25:02 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte ("Come back David Dewhurst; all is forgiven!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

Wow! Totally frickin’ unbelievable! This is like no election I have ever seen.

Great find!


17 posted on 07/27/2016 12:26:19 PM PDT by WMarshal (Trump 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The DNC blames "\Russia" so in affect, Trump says Well,if the Russians have all these emails I hope they give us Hillery's . They distort that into "Trump supports Russian espionqage" But please watch this !! ESPIONAGE HAS THE FOLLOWING DEFINITION."es·pi·o·nage ˈespēəˌnäZH/ noun the practice of spying or of using spies, typically by governments to obtain political and military information. synonyms: spying, infiltration" Are they saying that Hillery's deleted emails are governmental political and military information ? I thought they were personal?? They are admitting that they were not? If the Russians got them ,I hope they release them too!! I will speculate that Assange has them and he WILL release them. She is a liar. SHE VIOLATED THE ESPIONAGE act and our national security. Not Trump. They have so little to go with they do this out of desperation,.
18 posted on 07/27/2016 12:28:00 PM PDT by WENDLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
he DNC blames "\Russia" so in affect, Trump says Well,if the Russians have all these emails I hope they give us Hillery's . They distort that into "Trump supports Russian espionqage" But please watch this !! ESPIONAGE HAS THE FOLLOWING DEFINITION."es·pi·o·nage ˈespēəˌnäZH/ noun the practice of spying or of using spies, typically by governments to obtain political and military information. synonyms: spying, infiltration" Are they saying that Hillery's deleted emails are governmental political and military information ? I thought they were personal?? They are admitting that they were not? If the Russians got them ,I hope they release them too!! I will speculate that Assange has them and he WILL release them. She is a liar. SHE VIOLATED THE ESPIONAGE act and our national security. Not Trump. They have so little to go with they do this out of desperation,.
19 posted on 07/27/2016 12:29:40 PM PDT by WENDLE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

DNC create, you bet your booty!


20 posted on 07/27/2016 12:33:24 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson