Posted on 08/13/2016 6:18:45 AM PDT by Ray76
|
"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." - Obama, July 2, 2008 |
What objectives? Who set them?
This may begin to answer those questions, raise other questions, and perhaps point toward things needing further research.
Organization of Islamic Cooperation - Criminalization of "Islamophobia"
In 1990 the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) issued their “Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam” (http://www.oic-oci.org/english/article/human.htm). It’s Article 22 states: “Everyone shall have the right to express his opinion freely in such manner as would not be contrary to the principles of the Shariah. Everyone shall have the right to advocate what is right, and propagate what is good, and warn against what is wrong and evil according to the norms of Islamic Shariah.”
In other words, your freedom of speech and action may not be contrary to Shariah.
Since 1999 the OIC has introduced Resolutions to the UN Commission on Human Rights. In 1999 the Resolution introduced by OIC member Pakistan was titled Defamation of Islam (See document E/CN.4/1999/L.40 (https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G99/124/98/PDF/G9912498.pdf?OpenElement)) This Resolution states that the OIC is “Alarmed at the negative stereotyping of Islam and the tendency to associate human rights violations and terrorism with Islam”. The Resolution continues: “Emphasizing that nongovernmental organizations, religious bodies and communities have an important role to play in the promotion of tolerance and the protection of freedom of religion or belief, 1. Expresses its concern at the use of the print, audiovisual or electronic media or any other means to spread intolerance against Islam; 2. Expresses its appreciation of the efforts of many countries and societies to combat ignorance of and intolerance towards Islam; 3. Urges all States, within their national legal framework, in conformity with international human rights instruments, to take all necessary measures to combat hatred, discrimination, intolerance and acts of violence, intimidation and coercion motivated by religious intolerance, including attacks on religious places, and to encourage understanding, tolerance and respect in matters relating to freedom of religion or belief...”
The OIC considers "defamation of Islam" to be a violation of human rights and urges countries to modify their laws.
Similar resolutions have been introduced every year through 2010
2000 http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/E/CHR/resolutions/E-CN_4-RES-2000-84.doc
2001 http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/E/CHR/resolutions/E-CN_4-RES-2001-4.doc
2002 http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/E/CHR/resolutions/E-CN_4-RES-2002-9.doc
2003 http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/E/CHR/resolutions/E-CN_4-RES-2003-4.doc
2004 http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/E/CHR/resolutions/E-CN_4-RES-2004-6.doc
2005 http://ap.ohchr.org/documents/E/CHR/resolutions/E-CN_4-RES-2005-3.doc
2006 http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/60/150
2007 http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/61/164
2008 http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/62/154
2009 https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/G09/120/89/PDF/G0912089.pdf?OpenElement
2010 http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/65/224
Due to objections to the focus on Islam the OIC eventually agreed to allow other religions to be mentioned however Islam remained the primary focus.
In 2011 the UN Human Rights Commission adopted Resolution 16/18 (http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/16session/A.HRC.RES.16.18_en.pdf). This Resolution “Notes the speech given by Secretary-General of the Organization of the Islamic Conference at the fifteenth session of the Human Rights Council, and draws on his call on States to take the following actions”, among the actions listed: “Adopting measures to criminalize incitement to imminent violence based on religion or belief”
The OIC considers “Islamophobia” to be “incitement” (http://www.oic-oci.org/uploads/file/islamphobia/2011/en/islamphobia_rep_may_2010_to_april_2011_en.pdf page 35)
UNHRC Resolution 16/18 is the OIC’s vehicle to criminalize “Islamophobia”
The historic consensual adoption of the OIC sponsored UN Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18 entitled “Combating Intolerance, Negative Stereotyping and Stigmatization of, and Discrimination, Incitement to violence, and Violence against persons based on Religion or Belief” on March 21, 2011 as well in the subsequent sessions of the Council and the UN General Assembly, has effectively broken the myth of the global community’s inability to take a unified and determined stand to combat intolerance and hatred based on religion and belief. (page 2)
In order to combat Islamophobia and foster tolerance and mutual understanding based on international human rights standards, States, international organizations and non-state actors should [] Take all necessary measures within their power and legal/jurisdictional systems to ensure a safe environment (page 33)
http://www.oic-oci.org/oicv2/upload/islamophobia/2013/en/islamphobia_report_2013.pdf
(Also in 2011 a second OIC sponsored Resolution was adopted Dec 19, 2011, Resolution 66/167 (http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/C.3/66/L.47/Rev.1))
U.S. Implementation of UN Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18
At the invitation of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, representatives of 26 governments and four international organizations met in Washington, D.C. on December 12-14, 2011 to discuss the implementation of United Nations Human Rights Council Resolution (UNHRC) 16/18 (https://geneva.usmission.gov/2012/04/19/implementation1618/)
The Strong Cities Network
In March 2012 Obama issued Executive Order 13602, the White House Council on Strong Cities, Strong Communities. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-03-20/pdf/2012-6797.pdf
Press Release - Obama Administration Establishes White House Council on Strong Cities, Strong Communities
WASHINGTON, DC – Today, President Obama signed an Executive Order that will establish the White House Council on Strong Cities, Strong Communities (SC2). The Council will build on the SC2 pilot initiative launched June 2011 aimed at creating new partnerships between federal agencies and localities to spark economic development in communities that have faced significant long-term challenges in developing and implementing their economic strategies. Attached is the Executive Order signed by the President today on SC2.
Based at the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the interagency Council will include 19 federal agencies and will coordinate the implementation of SC2 and build a foundation for expanding the program to cities across the country.
This EO, although primarily focused on economic issues, establishes a structure which ties in with HUDs nationalization of zoning (the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule (AFFH)) and the Strong Cities Network (https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/AFFH-Rule-Guidebook.pdf page 123) which AG Lynch announced at the UN Sep 29, 2015 (http://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-loretta-e-lynch-announces-launch-strong-cities-network-united-nations) - "Through our Model Regions program, federal officials have partnered with a wide array of local stakeholders – including government and public safety officers, social service providers, educators, businesses and nonprofits – to build and implement community resilience frameworks tailored to the unique needs of residents."
Sep 29, 2015 - Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch at the United Nations
A.G. Lynch announces the Launch of the Strong Cities Network at the United Nations General Assembly http://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/attorney-general-loretta-e-lynch-announces-launch-strong-cities-network-united-nations
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/launch-strong-cities-network-strengthen-community-resilience-against-violent-extremism
Sep 29, 2015 - Obama at the United Nations
"And in all countries, it is vital to continue to build true partnerships with Muslim communities, based on trust and cooperation, so that they can help protect their loved ones from becoming radicalized." "This cannot just be the work of government. It is up to all of us. We have to commit ourselves to build diverse, tolerant, inclusive societies that reject anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant bigotry that creates the divisions, the fear and the resentments upon which extremists can prey.” http://www.un.org/News/dh/pdf/english/2015/29092015.pdf page 27
The Strong Cities Network is run by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue http://strongcitiesnetwork.org/
The Strong Cities Network was launched on September 29, 2015 at the UN General Assembly, AG Lynch gave the keynote address. http://www.strategicdialogue.org/events/
The Institute for Strategic Dialogue is linked to a group called The CEDAR Network. http://www.strategicdialogue.org/people/ (https://web.archive.org/web/20151208194052/http://www.strategicdialogue.org/people)
The CEDAR Network is the “European Muslim Professionals Network” and is supported by the Open Society Institute (Soros)
(The CEDAR Network domain lapsed sometime in 2014 so references are found in the Internet Archive.
http://web.archive.org/web/20110830203601/http://thecedarnetwork.com/about-us/vision/vision
http://web.archive.org/web/20110830195642/http://thecedarnetwork.com/about-us/management-board/management-board
http://web.archive.org/web/20110830195915/http://thecedarnetwork.com/
http://web.archive.org/web/20140403153315/http://www.thecedarnetwork.com/ scroll to the bottom to see the sponsors of their 2014 Leadership Forum)
Dec 3, 2015 - A.G. Lynch - “Now obviously this is a country that is based on free speech, but when it edges towards violence, when we see the potential for someone to lift — lifting that mantle of anti-Muslim rhetoric... when we see that we will take action.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/12/04/the-attorney-general-on-speech-that-edges-towards-violence-and-acts-of-anti-muslim-hatred-including-rhetoric/
Dec 17, 2015 - H.Res.569 Condemning violence, bigotry, and hateful rhetoric towards Muslims in the United States introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-resolution/569/text
Technique for Obtaining Federal Control of Police
Background - Egypt's "Arab Spring"
Facebook, Google, YouTube, MTV, Howcast, Columbia Law School and the U.S. Department of State Convene the Alliance of Youth Movements Summit Dec. 3-5 2008
Summit in New York to Bring Together Global Youth Groups, Tech Experts to Find Best Ways to Use Digital Media to Promote Freedom and Justice, Counter Violence, Extremism and Oppression
Panels will discuss a variety of practical topics, including How To Build Transnational Social Movements Using New Technology, How To Use New Mobile Technologies and How To Preserve Group Safety And Security
http://photos.state.gov/libraries/unesco/231771/pdfs/Alliance_of_Youth_Movements_Summit.pdf
In December 2008, one April 6 Youth Movement (A6YM) member visited the United States to take part in a State Department-organized “Alliance of Youth Movements Summit” in New York City. He also reported to his State Department contact that the A6YM group “would like to call for another strike on April 6, 2009, but realizes this would be ‘impossible’ due to SSIS [state security] interference,” and said that the government had driven the A6YM group’s leadership, including Maher, underground.
In June of 2010 Google executive Wael Ghonim anonymously created the “We Are All Khaled Said” Facebook page, a memorial to blogger Khaled Said who had posted a video of police allegedly splitting up drugs confiscated on June 6, 2010; the police tracked him down and beat him to death on the street.
A large movement coalesced around the “We Are All Khaled Said” Facebook page.
The A6YM picked Jan. 25, 2011 as their protest date because it’s a public holiday: Police Day. In previous years they had always marched on Jan. 25 to mock the holiday, as A6YM leader Maher said: “Because how can we be expected to celebrate these thugs, torturers, criminals?”
Fifteen days before the date, A6YM set up an “operation room,” as Maher described it in an interview. Its purpose was “to discuss routine details including assessing the reach of our calls to protest with regard to internet websites, looking at the data and information that was being provided to citizens, and studying innovative mechanisms of protesting which aimed to overcome the methods that the state security services always use to pre-empt demonstrations and protests.”
Two days before the planned protest, Maher said the group organized cells of 30-50 activists; each cell was to regroup in a pre-selected spot in Cairo, but only one person in each cell would direct the cell to the “main rendezvous point.”
The April 6 Youth Movement issued specific demands on Feb. 6, 2011:
Obama called for Mubarak to step down.
Mubarak was forced out Feb 11, 2011.
The military ruled until June 2012 when the Muslim Brotherhood took over with the election of Morsi.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/revolution-in-cairo/inside-april6-movement/
http://www.npr.org/2012/02/09/146636605/wael-ghonim-creating-a-revolution-2-0-in-egypt
The State Department organized training in how to use social media such as Facebook and Twitter to organize protests, and how to conduct those protests. A small annual protest, Police Day, was used for another purpose - Khaled Said became the focus - largely due to Ghonim's Facebook page.
The Khaled Said incident was used to generate protests. Those protests served another purpose.
The technique: find a small local issue, puff it up & generate protests, suborn it & redirect the protest for your own purposes.
Applying the Technique in the U.S.
In 2015 Obama’s “Task Force on 21st Century Policing” issued their Final Report (http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/pdf/taskforce/TaskForce_FinalReport.pdf) and accompanying Implementation Guide (http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/pdf/taskforce/Implementation_Guide.pdf)
On page 72 of the Final Report it is noted that Deray McKesson and Black Lives Matter, both participated.
In his written testimony (http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/pdf/taskforce/submissions/McKesson_DeRay_Testimony.pdf) McKesson complains that “police brutality is not a coincidental aspect of American life, but that it is deeply woven into the fabric of American policing and that it falls heavily along the lines of race.” He says that he began protesting in Ferguson, Missouri, and that “I, like many others, have been tear gassed repeatedly, have had ‘non-lethal’ weapons pointed at me by officers, have been told that it was illegal to stand still on an American street, and have been pepper sprayed – all for engaging in peaceful protest.” (Who can forget the rioting, looting, and arson, in Ferguson?) He continues, “it is necessary for the Department of Justice, in conjunction with community organizations and local law enforcement, to develop virtual and in-person training modules whose use is mandatory by all police departments receiving federal funding that focuses on implicit bias” and “Twitter and other social media tools were pivotal to the protest community”
On page 28 of the Final Report it is noted that Linda Sarsour of the National Network for Arab American Communities participated. In her written testimony (http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/pdf/taskforce/submissions/Sarsour_Linda_Testimony.pdf) she complains about “Islamophobia”. Sarsour states that police are perceived as biased, she recommends that police training curriculum include input from “community-based organizations” and “faith based leaders” and training be subject to ongoing monitoring by these groups. She also recommends that the DOJ establish a “civilian review board” composed of these groups “that can provide suggestions on what the DOJ mandates on those departments so they can be compliant with civil rights”
On page 20 of the Implementation Guide officer training is listed as a key tool to drive change. Training must address “implicit bias”, “engage the community in training” and “include community members as trainers”.
On page 16 of the Implementation Guide, “The final report and its recommendations can be an effective template for law enforcement organizations and communities to measure progress against a national, objective set of recommendations.” Also: Create a checklist using the recommendations, use the checklist in local government, law enforcement, and community meetings as a management tool to drive implementation, provide regular updates to the community and local government on progress being made on implementing specific recommendations
On page 23 of the Implementation Guide: State legislatures - Review and mandate requirements for police state training academies for basic recruit and in-service hours and content in light of the task force recommendations.
Additionally agencies are required to admit previous injustices. This “shaming” is psychological manipulation.
The Final Report list numerous recommendations including: federal training standards, numerous reports to be filed with federal government (police demographics, “community” demographics, arrestee demographics, incidents reports, for example).
Additional information regarding the Task Force: http://sai-dc.com/presidents-task-force-on-21st-century-policing/
Obama routinely meets with Black Lives Matter leadership. Black Lives Matter has generated protests and leads chants of “f the police” etc. They have received training from the DOJ. Obama has used Black Lives Matter to create and nurture an anti-police environment. He repeatedly legitimizes their acts. Black Lives Matter is used by Obama as street muscle to generate the dynamic necessary for his agenda, which is federalization of police.
His exploits with Black Lives Matter uses a tactic directly from the playbook of Operation Arab Spring: find a small local issue, puff it up & generate protests, suborn it for your own purposes.
Closing Comments
The Khaled Said incident was used to generate protests. Those protests served another purpose.
Black Lives Matter is used to generate protests and support a narrative. Those protests and the narrative they support serve another purpose.
"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."
In the U.S. the purpose is federalization of police via the rubrics of “standards” & “reporting”. A *de facto* national security force is created. Standards are defined by the U.N. and by the Organization of Islamic Cooperation.
It's worth noting that the de facto national security force created by federal standards enables the OIC’s agenda of criminalizing “Islamophobia”. Your freedom of speech and action will not be contrary to Shariah.
The hood is being slowly pulled over our head via “soft law” “guidelines” and “standards”. Those guidelines and standards will become mandatory (see the instructions to State legislatures on page 23 of the Implementation Guide) and federal dollars will be the leverage.
Who is Obama? What are the goals of his "fundamental transformation"?
Perhaps these are clues:
Muslim Call to Prayer One of the Prettiest Sounds on Earth - Obama, Mar 6, 2007 interview with New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/06/opinion/06kristof.html?_r=0
The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. - Obama, Sep 25, 2012 , at the UN
I might buy into some of this crap is I didn’t see them tossing people off 4-story building, murdering their wives, mutilating their children, and using human bombs to kill indiscriminately. Religion of Peace my a$$.
Beware the Muslim brotherhood
Obama is an Islamist who worships a pedophile. Obama will do as much Islamic damage to this country as he is allowed to do.
Regarding AFFH
“Through our Model Regions program, federal officials have partnered with a wide array of local stakeholders – including government and public safety officers, social service providers, educators, businesses and nonprofits – to build and implement community resilience frameworks tailored to the unique needs of residents.”
Partnership for Sustainable Communities
Sustainable Communities Initiative
Fair Housing and Equity Assessments
Strong Cities, Strong Communities
http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/economic_resilience
Also:
http://freerepublic.com/tag/affh/index
http://freerepublic.com/tag/centralplanning/index
An online document in the “Strong Cities” section has been revised.
The reference to the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule (https://www.hudexchange.info/resources/documents/AFFH-Rule-Guidebook.pdf page 123)
should now refer to page 126.
Both page references are to the document page, not the pdf page.
HUD explicitly references “The Strong Cities Strong Communities (SC2) Initiative”
Introduced 04/06/2017 - H.Res.257 - Condemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States. - https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-resolution/257/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22HRes+257%22%5D%7D&r=1
Introduced 04/05/2017 - S.Res.118 - A resolution condemning hate crime and any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States. - https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-resolution/118
Representative Barbara Comstock, second term Republican from Virginia’s 10thDistrict is teaming up with EmergeUSA and Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) to successfully pass a House Resolution which condemns ethnic, religious and racial hate crimes. - http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/267051/why-did-marco-rubio-submit-islamist-mpac-daniel-greenfield
EmergeUSA - http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=7720
MPAC - http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/printgroupProfile.asp?grpid=6177
Obama created his OWN ARMY....Organizing for AMERICA!!
Thanks Ray76.
[snip] Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to. [/snip]
Dr. Theodore Dalrymple: Our Culture, What’s Left Of It
interviewed by Jamie Glazov | Frontpage | August 31, 2005
http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=7445
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.