Skip to comments.(Data Mining Expert:) Trump Wins By Landslide-Polls 100% Manufactured
Posted on 11/03/2016 7:11:32 AM PDT by ResisTyr
Internet data mining expert Clif High says the naked data on the Internet shows Trump winning the 2016 Presidential election by a landslide. High explains, You can do a search on YouTube that brings back a list of primary speeches by both candidates. I am not talking about Fred Smiths copy of a video he made of Trump. I am talking about a speech took officially of Trump, and they released it officially. If you take just those, you can see youve got Hillary Clinton on one side with 2,165 views, and Trump on the other side with 775,653 views. So, that is not anecdotal. This is a very crude level of statistical analysis, but it is nonetheless statistical analysis, and it is very pointed because it is extremely self-selecting. There is nobody watching you when you choose to watch something on YouTube. So, there is no peer pressure or external person polling you. . . . Its what I call a very naked data set because there is no pressure on an emotional level on people.
(Excerpt) Read more at usawatchdog.com ...
Anything puked out by the MSM is manufactured bunk.
Seems like this algorithm must be similar to Amazon’s predictive stocking of inventory at their regional distribution centers or the sidebar advertisements on the internet. I wonder what the data shows for political bling purchases?
A data mining expert who doesn't understand what "orders of magnitude means"? I wouldn't trust this guy to do my laundry.
This just popped up on my FB feed:
A magnitude of order is 10 times. so Trump is going to win 90% to 9%?
Which “blue states” is Trump going to win?
HRC and the dems had hundreds of millions to spend on advertising in major markets. Need to keep that race tight ya know? It’s all about the money.
I think he does. Look at the data. Orders of magnitude. One in the general, two in EV.
It would be interesting to compare any videos of Obama vs Romney. If you could count the viewership up until the election day of 2012 - I don’t know if data that specific is available. But that would compare the viewership numbers against the actual voting results.
Holy Grail.. MN?
That would rock!!
Worse than that, he said “orders of magnitude”, so more than one, or at least 100 times.
That would have to be an awfully “broad participation” conspiracy, making it look like BS.
I guess we can compare those numbers to Tuesday’s results, though. :)
Even though I believe Trump will win I trust Cliff High and his wed bot bunk as much as I trust Nostradamus.
Cut him some slack. In US electoral terms 350 EV IS orders of magnitude.
I saved a copy, just in case.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.