(Data Mining Expert:) Trump Wins By Landslide-Polls 100% Manufactured

USAwatchdog.com ^ | October 28, 2016 | Greg Hunter

[ResisTyr]

How big is Trump winning by? High says, “Basically, when you go through all the analysis and all the other video archives, you come up with a 25 to 1 ratio (in favor of Trump). High says the Trump’s winning vote total will be orders of magnitude greater than Clinton’s. High uses a program he invented that he says uses the“art of predictive linguistics” to forecast future events.

[fwdude]

Anything puked out by the MSM is manufactured bunk.

[ptsal]

Seems like this algorithm must be similar to Amazon’s predictive stocking of inventory at their regional distribution centers or the sidebar advertisements on the internet. I wonder what the data shows for political bling purchases?

[LambSlave]

the Trump’s winning vote total will be orders of magnitude greater than Clinton’s

A data mining expert who doesn't understand what "orders of magnitude means"? I wouldn't trust this guy to do my laundry.

[Salamander]

This just popped up on my FB feed:

http://nesara.news/index.php/busted-here-are-the-complete

[dangerdoc]

A magnitude of order is 10 times. so Trump is going to win 90% to 9%?

Hmmmmm........

[smokingfrog]

Which “blue states” is Trump going to win?

[blackdog]

HRC and the dems had hundreds of millions to spend on advertising in major markets. Need to keep that race tight ya know? It’s all about the money.

[Liz]

"Me? President?"

[wastoute]

I think he does. Look at the data. Orders of magnitude. One in the general, two in EV.

[Wilhelm Tell]

It would be interesting to compare any videos of Obama vs Romney. If you could count the viewership up until the election day of 2012 - I don’t know if data that specific is available. But that would compare the viewership numbers against the actual voting results.

[CygnusXI]

Holy Grail.. MN?
That would rock!!

[LambSlave]

He said the winning vote total would be orders of magnitude greater. That means if Clinton has a mere 20 million votes Trump would have at least 100 times that, or 2 billion votes.

[KSCITYBOY]

YUP

[LambSlave]

Worse than that, he said “orders of magnitude”, so more than one, or at least 100 times.

[drpix]

In fact he uses the plural, "orders of magnitude." So he is saying 10¹, 10², 10³, 10⁴... (10:1, 100:1, 1,000:1....). He can't know what he's saying>

[Mr. Douglas]

That would have to be an awfully “broad participation” conspiracy, making it look like BS.

I guess we can compare those numbers to Tuesday’s results, though. :)

[pgkdan]

Even though I believe Trump will win I trust Cliff High and his wed bot bunk as much as I trust Nostradamus.

[wastoute]

Cut him some slack. In US electoral terms 350 EV IS orders of magnitude.

[Salamander]

I saved a copy, just in case.