Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/11/2017 11:00:59 AM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sean_Anthony

The BS flag is flying high.


2 posted on 04/11/2017 11:07:11 AM PDT by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sean_Anthony

Didn’t they do that during 43’s term in 2003?

And will they restore the part that Harry Reid threw out because Republicans were using it?


3 posted on 04/11/2017 11:16:42 AM PDT by kingu (Everything starts with slashing the size and scope of the federal government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sean_Anthony

More malarkey from Markey.


5 posted on 04/11/2017 11:39:04 AM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sean_Anthony

Anyone who ever believes one word that Markey says is a complete fool.


7 posted on 04/11/2017 11:49:12 AM PDT by Bayan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sean_Anthony

Such an ass. I saw him a couple years ago in a nearby Labor Day parade. I stuck out my wallet and yelled, “Ed, just take the whole thing and get it over with!”

He smiled and waved.


10 posted on 04/11/2017 12:04:26 PM PDT by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sean_Anthony

Don’t hold your breath Eddie.


11 posted on 04/11/2017 12:30:55 PM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sean_Anthony

Ed Morrissey at Hotair quoted Tom Daschle in a Daily Caller article:

“Unfortunately, Democrats have far dirtier hands when it comes to the erosion of the institutional pillars of the Senate than Republicans going all the way back to–you know, they used to do filibusters in the House and the Senate. And the Senate — the House took them away in the 1830s, and the Senate began taking them away under Woodrow Wilson in 1917–then getting rid of the talking filibuster in the 70s–and then the whole budget process was a Democratic product, and that was in my view a procedural disaster.

Then we lowered the threshold from 67 to 60. That was a Democratic effort. And then in 2013, we took it away completely for nominations and that was Democratic. So, Democrats who may lament this institutional deterioration, I think there’s a lot of history here that can’t be explained away.”


12 posted on 04/11/2017 1:23:42 PM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson