Yes!!!
If there are any remaining UNDISTRIBUTED funds from any of these earlier Obama shake-down agreements, I hope the Trump administration will ask the shaken down private entities to cease further funding of the Obama cronies. Instead, the extorted entities could either simply keep those extorted funds or distribute them (or a lesser amount to encourage them) to the federal general fund. This would be done by a revised agreement, of course.
....no kickbacks to Odungo?....
I heard Rush talking about this the other day. Thanks to FOIA, Judicial Watch, Heritage Foundation and Peter Schweitzer for uncovering this. Obama shook down companies and levied fines on them, then diverted the money to left wing groups including Planned Parenthood.
How can this not be considered a crime? Oh, I forget, it probably is. Politicians are above all that.
I’d like to know how much “kickback” money Obama got from the midnight transfer of the pallet of millions sent to Iran. He isn’t buying million dollar houses and traveling the world wit S&H Green Stamps.
Who was more corrupt—the Clintons or Obama?
It’s a toss to me, but there’s a difference.
The Clintons—especially Hillary—were madly corrupt in a personal way. They wanted to acquire wealth along with exercising political power.
Obama was more of a “robbin’ hood.” He may have diverted far larger sums of money than the Clintons, but he sprayed it around to his favorite lefty causes—gay this, Arab that. WHy, he managed to send off $400 million as he walked out the door to the Palis.
Meanwhile, poor Bill and Hillary had to scrimp and save to build up a Foundation war chest of about that much, taking bribes one by one, giving speeches. Poor things.
In terms of their bank accounts, I’d say the Clintons are way ahead of Barack at this point. But in terms of the amount of money directly diverted, I’d give the edge to Obama. True, Hillary’s actions at State which were influenced by bribes (say, Uranium One, or the Haitian relief effort) may have cost us a lot, but Obama was far more direct.
The slush fund payments from coerced settlements that are the subject of this article is an example.
“From now on, any settlement money will go to the actual victims, instead of the left wing groups that Obama favored, but which had no legal claim to the money.”
How about settlement money be applied to pay down the national debt? In these shakedowns by Democrat administrations there may be no real “victims”. Eliminate discretion. Pass an actual law that says any settlement money collected by the government be received by the Treasury and applied to the national debt. If there are real “victims”, they are free to file a civil suit of their own and claim damages.