Skip to comments.Open Borders Are Not Pro-Life And The Unborn Are Not Illegal Aliens
Posted on 06/21/2018 12:11:41 PM PDT by Starman417
Having ignored an earlier border deal that would have made the issue moot, Democrats have stooped to a new low by comparing the separation of children from their illegal alien parents as required by current law to the mass murder of the unborn, including the harvesting and sale of fetal body parts. That is what Charles C. Camosy, a board member of Democrats for Life, an oxymoron if there ever was one, does in the June 16 New York Times opinion section in a piece with the Orwellian title You Cant Be Pro-Life And Against Immigrant Children:
In standing by President Trump and his administration and, indeed, in now honoring him as their standard-bearer traditional pro-life leaders have put short-term and uncertain political gain ahead of consistent moral principle .First, these are not immigrant children. They are children of illegal alien parents. Second, no innocent children are being physically harmed in anyway, certainly not killed in their mothers womb. The Border Patrol is not Planned Parenthood. If illegal alien parents dont want to be separated from their children, how about not crossing the border illegally with them? This comparison is obscene and slanderous. Abortion and Planned Parenthood separate more kids from their families and mothers than the Border Patrol which, by the way, doesn't kill them in the womb. Liberals such as Camosy, who I assume supports sanctuary cities, offer no sanctuary for the unborn who also seek to avoid violence and murder in what should be the safest safe space in the world their mothers womb.
If the traditional pro-life movement is to regain credibility as something other than a tool of the Trump administration, it must speak out clearly and forcefully against harming innocent children as a means of deterring undocumented immigration.
Being pro-fife and against open borders are not inconsistent positions, particularly when you consider open borders have led to a vast increase in MS-13 entrants and unaccompanied minors and those who would be their recruits. How is opposing a system that lets MS-13 butchers, rapists and murders into this country not pro-life?
American citizens have a right to life and a right not to be killed by illegal aliens. As Bill OReilly noted in his June 1, 2016 Talking Points Memo:
You may remember last July 32-year-old Kate Steinle was murdered in San Francisco. She was out for a walk with her father when an illegal alien felon convicted in the U.S.A. seven times deported five times shot her in the back. The man Mexican national Juan Francisco Lopez Sanchez had been released from jail by the San Francisco Sheriff's Department. That despite the fact that ICE, Homeland Security, had asked San Francisco authorities to keep Sanchez incarcerated until they could pick him up.Opposing this is not pro-life? On Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2015, Jamiel Shaw Sr. testified before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on how his son, Jamiel Shaw, Jr., was killed by an illegal alien in 2008 harbored by the sanctuary city of Los Angeles
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
Reason 957,378,925,675,346 why the left has gone insane...
Unless it’s convenient for the left.
Democrats would rather kill unborn citizens than protect our borders. Invasion is ok, infanticide is ok. Democrats discriminate if it’s bad the USA they approve.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.