Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amy Coney Barrett is the Perfect Nominee for this Moment in Time
DB Daily Update ^ | David Blackmon

Posted on 07/09/2018 5:13:11 AM PDT by EyesOfTX

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

1 posted on 07/09/2018 5:13:11 AM PDT by EyesOfTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

“Fainting Felon” is clever, but she’ll always be PIAPS to me.


2 posted on 07/09/2018 5:15:40 AM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Get off my lawn and GTFO of my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

Politically correct but substantively a woman Supreme Court Justice is a disaster.


3 posted on 07/09/2018 5:20:58 AM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

Maybe Barrett will break the pattern.

Just can’t go on with all the SC women on the leftists’ side, the optics are awful, and it’s a tire iron that Democrats and their Media pals will always use to bash us.

Why can’t there be strong conservative women on the SC?


4 posted on 07/09/2018 5:27:56 AM PDT by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: T-Bone Texan

Barrett is probably good, but for this seat, “probably” is not good enough.


5 posted on 07/09/2018 5:31:42 AM PDT by SarahPalin2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

Three words: Sandra Day O’Connor


6 posted on 07/09/2018 5:31:42 AM PDT by Arm_Bears (Hey, Rocky--Watch me pull a rabbit out of my hat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

I so disagree. Give her time in her relatively new position to see how her conservative, pro-Constitution views hold up. As someone else on FR pointed out last week, when Ginsburg goes (one way or another) the outcry will be for a female to replace her. It’s best to save the best female for that point, who might or might not be Barrett.


7 posted on 07/09/2018 5:32:26 AM PDT by grania (President Trump, stop believing the Masters of War!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

She may be qualified but please tell me of one past or existing female SCOTUS justice that was not a liberal. The three existing female SCOTUS justices would, I believe, influence her enough that she would “grow in office.”


8 posted on 07/09/2018 5:33:20 AM PDT by fritzthecat (I only regret my economies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

Insufficient experience...


9 posted on 07/09/2018 5:35:18 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

So are FReepers who have a bias against women.


10 posted on 07/09/2018 5:45:11 AM PDT by bigbob (Trust Sessions. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Hardiman. Has experience Barrett lacks today, but will have when Ginsberg goes. Fav of Trump’s sister, was on short list last time which is why he was not interviewed this time around. Uncontentious nomination.

This will be a tough pick to get through. Next time it will be easy.


11 posted on 07/09/2018 5:46:19 AM PDT by PSUGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

Clinton is “leaking” her impending Presidential run (again). I hope the Democrats fall for it (again), and have her suck all of the oxygen out of their campaigns.


12 posted on 07/09/2018 5:54:04 AM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grania

Trump will definitely have the opportunity to do this then.

I have been so sickened at the public attacks on conservative women — Ivanka, DeVos, Sanders, Melania — I can’t stand the upcoming spectacle if Barrett is appointed.

But perhaps Trump will enjoy the optics of all the fem libs coming to pummel her.


13 posted on 07/09/2018 6:01:21 AM PDT by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

There are some men on FR who believe that “strong conservative women” don’t exist. They think women are, by nature, weak in principle and intellect.

I don’t know anything about this judge, but some of the knee-jerk misogyny here is laughable.


14 posted on 07/09/2018 6:01:27 AM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grania
Give her time in her relatively new position to see how her conservative, pro-Constitution views hold up.
As someone else on FR pointed out last week, when Ginsburg goes (one way or another) the outcry will be for a female to replace her. It’s best to save the best female for that point, who might or might not be Barrett.


I agree with you
15 posted on 07/09/2018 6:04:27 AM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

I ageee she would be the best choice but I am not sure she’s confirmable. And if she fails then there will be no time before the election for plan B.


16 posted on 07/09/2018 6:04:44 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

We MUST have a strong constitutionalist on the SC.

Does she qualify?

Literally nothing else matters.


17 posted on 07/09/2018 6:05:07 AM PDT by agere_contra (Please pray for Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Either way, if Barrett is the nominee, I will still be very excited.
:)
18 posted on 07/09/2018 6:05:50 AM PDT by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX
"they will have people coming out of the woodwork to accuse them of sexual harassment or some other sorts of wrongdoing from many years ago that cannot be proven or disproven. For this simple reason alone, the President should pick Judge Barrett to fill this seat. As we saw during the 2016 election campaign, it is just too easy for the Democrats to go out and pay a woman or ten women to claim they had affairs or were sexually harassed by a male nominee."

Well, that's it then. Only women will be appointed to the Supreme Court from now on. The children of newer arrivals around the east and west coasts have spoken. Besides, Democrats know about the "woman's prerogative" and tendency. And they're banking on it.


19 posted on 07/09/2018 6:07:21 AM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

True. There will be no time. However, that could work in our favor in
a massive get out the vote in the coming election to insure we have more
Senators who can confirm after the election.


20 posted on 07/09/2018 6:19:41 AM PDT by tennmountainman ("Trust Sessions" Yeah Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson