Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

End the White House Press Briefing Now
DB Daily Update ^ | David Blackmon

Posted on 08/03/2018 5:01:46 AM PDT by EyesOfTX

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: EyesOfTX

For the first time I tried to watch a press briefing last night. Normally I’m only exposed to those “dramatic” encounters on youtube. This one was just a really stupid exercise in futility. If that’s really all they are, they should be eliminated except when something important happens, like 9/11 or Pearl Harbor. And perhaps a monthly one on top of that. Half hour should be fine.

And when she points to one reporter after answering the question of the previous one, and the previous one keeps obnoxiously trying to ask irrelevant follow ups, she should be able to say, “Security, would you pleas remove this man/woman?” And then we wait, while they rea tazed and dragged out, Hillary style.

Ok, just kidding about the tazer part. :)


21 posted on 08/03/2018 6:14:41 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

Just don’t televise it, provide everyone with a transcript.


22 posted on 08/03/2018 6:14:43 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

I look forward to seeing them.


23 posted on 08/03/2018 6:14:55 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
At the very least, don’t put the camera on them.

Yep, they like showing and acting out their activism on TV

24 posted on 08/03/2018 6:15:51 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

Random pick the reporter. Only allow 5 questions


25 posted on 08/03/2018 6:17:01 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX
The Trump White house and Sarah Saunders have Jim Acosta's panties wound up so tight he can't sit down and cross his legs without castrating himself.
26 posted on 08/03/2018 6:23:17 AM PDT by urbanpovertylawcenter (the law and poverty collide in an urban setting and sparks fly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

A ‘Press’ that surreptitiously funnels the Presidential Debate questions to one of the candidates
is clearly an enemy of the people, a propaganda arm of a political party and worthy of having derision heaped upon it.


27 posted on 08/03/2018 6:25:38 AM PDT by kanawa (Trump Loves a Great Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

His new nickname should be Sandbox Jimmy . . .

#SandboxJimmy


28 posted on 08/03/2018 6:28:21 AM PDT by LRoggy (Peter's Son's Business)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

Completely agree
Throw some bleach into the WH press pool and issue credentials to reporters who agree to a code of conduct
Then use the SS as bouncers as needed

This orchestrated chaos by fools like Acosta could easily mask a dry run ( in which he wittingly or unwittingly played a role as distractor) for a terrorist attack on the WH, the POTUS, or a visiting foreign leader


29 posted on 08/03/2018 6:35:41 AM PDT by silverleaf (A man who kneels for the national anthem doesn't stand for much of anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

Just ban Costa and replace him with another shill from CNN.
That ought to make their heads do a Linda Blair (Regan in Exorcist)


30 posted on 08/03/2018 6:38:29 AM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bray

Raise hands, no shout outs

Those are the rules now but as we all see CNN doesn’t follow any rules which is why Acosta needs to be removed.


31 posted on 08/03/2018 6:40:19 AM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: outpostinmass2

Gee wonder why?
Ya think maybe because he is as big an A-hole at home as he is at work.


32 posted on 08/03/2018 6:42:04 AM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Have them email or tweet their questions. Any the President feels like answering gets posted to the White House web site.

There is nothing in the Constitution which requires the President to talk to reporters.


33 posted on 08/03/2018 6:43:08 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It rubs the rainbow on itÂ’s skin or it gets the diversity again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX
Some great numbers for President Donald Trump (I still never tire of typing those three words) in the latest Rasmussen survey. His public approval rating is back up to 50%, which is 5 points higher than Barack Hussein Obama’s rating was at this same point in his first term.

I hate to burst anyone's bubble, but using Obama's approval rating as a standard for comparison is a very low bar. Obama's unfavorable rating at this point in his first term resulted in the historic nationwide Republican landslide in the 2010 elections. We need to do a hellofalot better than that.

34 posted on 08/03/2018 7:14:42 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

At one point the Trump administration said they would stop televising the White House Briefings and then backed down. Why?

Bar all cameras. Without sound bites to show off their grandstanding the press may start asking real questions to get answers and not just shout out whatever they think will make them look good to their liberal base on TV.


35 posted on 08/03/2018 7:21:22 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Who on earth uses a Fax these days?


36 posted on 08/03/2018 7:26:54 AM PDT by Howie66 ("...Against All Enemies, Foreign and Democrat.....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
ze and zir | Gender Neutral Pronoun

Are you serious, or did you forget the /s?

37 posted on 08/03/2018 7:32:15 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (MAGAMarchOnWashington.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Howie66

“Who on earth uses a Fax these days?”

I’ll bet the Feral Gubmint has a few hundred they could blow the dust off of laying around somewhere.

L


38 posted on 08/03/2018 7:35:30 AM PDT by Lurker (President Trump isn't our last chance. President Trump is THEIR last chance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: EyesOfTX

Ban CNN from the briefings.


39 posted on 08/03/2018 7:39:37 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!; Lazamataz; bagster
That is an interesting rabbit hole to go down. A thesis could be written on the subject, before reaching any settled conclusions. Do the referents of said pronoun see the pronoun as an insult or do they invite the use of the pronoun? Was it intended as an insult or a bowing to changing customs and mores? Or could one, by bowing to present custom and mores be delivering the ultimate insult? If they take it as an insult what does that say about them and their understanding of customs and mores? If they don't what does that say about their manhood/womenhood?

Such a study is beyond what I could presently undertake, but such an examination would be necessary before I could answer your question.

40 posted on 08/03/2018 7:42:44 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson