Posted on 09/25/2018 9:14:57 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Anita Hill should have the teeth beaten out of her lying Front Hole face...
"...The really fatal fact about Anita Hill's accusations was that they were first made to the Senate Judiciary Committee in confidence, and she asked that her name not be mentioned when the accusations were presented to Judge Thomas by those trying to pressure him to withdraw his nomination to the Supreme Court.
Think about it: The accusations referred to things that were supposed to have happened when only two people were present.
If the accusations were true, Clarence Thomas would automatically know who originated them. Anita Hill's request for anonymity made sense only if the charges were false. "
The same and worse is true for Ford's accusations. She wants to prevent Kavanaugh from being confirmed, destroy his reputation, while avoiding any legal process.
In actuality, Chrissie Blatantly-Whored "encouraged" the next-door neighbor's German Shepherd to "take care of her needs"...
Democrat tactics have not changed in 30 years.
The Media refuse to report on credible anonymous online reports about Anita Hill's prediliction for sex with various barnyard animals...
At the end of the Thomas hearing a black attorney testified Hill actively persued him to the point that he had to forcefully tell her he wasn’t interested in her. This was after her association with Thomas. Her contact with Thomas ended when he married.
I believe in both cases she was looking for a meal ticket and she went to law school to get a rich husband.
I believe Clarence Thomas.
Seconded.
It was a long drive from the Oral Roberts University campus to the Tulsa International Airport one night for Anita and Clarence.
Anita Hill had more credence than anyone ever had before from an evangelical background—now buried. revised, and obliterated for modern tastes and sensibilities.
Lying harlot of the left speaks from NPR pulpit.
I though it was interesting the dates Hill sites 82-83 these are the same years Ford uses or around that time.
Alos I just noticed this below paragrah 2 line 2 this is in quotes. I saw the letter Ford wrote and the wording was quite different.
She says that during a party, Kavanaugh drunkenly pinned her down in a bedroom and groped her as a friend of his looked on.
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” Ford, a research psychologist in California, has said. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”
The letter from Ford said this:
Kavanaugh was on top of me while laughing with Judge, who periodically jumped onto Kavanaugh.
They both laughed as Kavanaugh tried to disrobe me in their highly inebriated state.
With Kavanaugh’s hand over my mouth, I feared he may inadvertently kill me. From across the room, a very drunken Judge said mixed words to Kavanaugh, ranging from “go for it” to “stop.”
At one point, when Judge jumped onto the bed, the weight on me was substantial.
The pile toppled and the two scrapped with each other.
After a few attempts to get away, I was able to take this opportune moment to get up and run across to a hallway bathroom”.
So which quote will be at the hearing I wonder.
Of course it cannot be fair. It is based on a contrived fraud, nothing more. How can that be fair?
“the hearing cannot provide the senators
with enough information to reach a reasonable conclusion,”
Hence the reason for a statute of
limitations.
From one liar to another.....
This is the statement every Republican committee member must say:
Ms. Ford,
Thank you for coming to speak to us today. I understand how difficult it is to speak publicly on such a sensitive and personal memory.
Let me say that I believe you, I believe you are a survivor, and you are courageous to speak out on the horrific circumstances.
I believe this incident did happen, and that it was traumatic. And that you should be believed that it did happen to you. But I am not certain that it was Brett Kavenaugh who did this to you, and we don’t have any evidence to indicate that he was the person who assaulted you. And that is the purpose of this hearing.
Its not meant to be judicially “fair”. It is amazing that she is getting a hearing at all given the scant or non-existent evidence, her poor memory, the way it reappeared in her memory, the manner in which the Democrats have used it as a last minute Hail Mary to get their own way. It certainly is not fair to Brett Kavanaugh to be accused in a manner which gives him little redress and in a forum which cannot clear his name. It is not fair on his family to suffer the humiliation, degradation and to have to live in fear because of one woman’s preposterous story that would not pass muster in a court of law. He has been tried, convicted and sentenced in the eyes of the media, the Democrats and from those whose minds are full of the filth that he is accused off. I believe him because his whole life has been about the law, about respect for the constitution and his love for the country. I dont believe her because she has so much invested in him losing this nomination and the people who support her have even moreso. To those to whom politics is everything, everything is political - including what is fair!
Well, she’s the expert. :-D
Actually, no she isn’t. “Fair” is one of the mos subjective words in the English language. “That’s not fair” is the mantra of the child not getting her way.
Your contradictory testimony was not convincing and after making hundreds of thousands of dollars as a speaker over the past 27 years you are still milking your false claims for more.
You are a very lackluster college professor who got your job because you cried wolf where there was none. But keep right on carrying your case to the media: there is always one more rabid MSM reporter who will have you on just because of your rep. Pitiful woman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.