[nikos1121]

Yes, but it puts these people in the Senate on record with their vote. I think it’s a brilliant move, and it might just pass.

[dp0622]

I was referring to the lead in the race for senate in Texas.

But I AGREE wholeheartedly with what you are saying.

And I like it too.

Don’t like that in real time he has been with Ryan the past 2 years in holding it up, though.

But I still agree the vote is a good thing.

[Yo-Yo]

Yes, but it puts these people in the Senate on record with their vote.

So what? I can tell you right now all of the Republicans will vote for it, and all of the Democrats will vote against it, but since you need 60 votes to close debate the bill will die. And Dem constituents will be happy about the bill dying, and Dem senators perhaps even proud to have their vote on the record.

[Nateman]

Ditto. It might just give Republicans that 60/40 Senate they need to pass it after the Midterm's. In fact that may have been the plan from day one.

[MortMan]

On the record, but after the election, as I understand it.

[pfony1]

Let’s see now:

1. Most Americans want the “Wall” to be built.
2. All Democrat Senators will vote against the “Wall”.
3. Some donor-puppet RINOs MAY vote against the “Wall”.

SO...

Either the bill to fund completion of the “Wall” will be passed...

OR...

All the anti-American quislings (Democrats and RINOs) will be un-masked by their votes — BEFORE the Mid-term election!

Sounds good to me!