Posted on 11/28/2018 10:14:13 AM PST by Starman417
Very concerned; Roberts is more concerned about being “loved”
than the constitution. He very well could be the next Souter or at the least “swing vote” Kennedy.
His wife must be a Hillary supporter and she beats him when he comes home.
Nearly the whole FISA court was picked by Roberts. Everyone of them was previous Obama picks minus one.
I know still nominated by President Bush and would take another 8
As would I, but he was second choice to Harriet Myers that shows Bush’s real inclinations.
Chief Justice John Roberts is not a true conservative as proven by his Obamacare decision for one.
He is also compromised ideologically: another elitist overlord.
“We live in the courts.”
Violating the rule of law to ostensibly support the rule of law is ultimately a losing proposition Constitutionally.
Exult in more 3D Chess if you like; I refuse to do so. Roberts had no prerogative to so act “strategically”!
The Rule of Law is meaningless to lawless ideologues like the liberals on the court. Since they ignore the facts, then you must outmaneuver them.
Be as rigid as you like, it is still better than an unconstitutional law is broken, than a Supreme Court justice gets a personal “moral victory” leaving the unconstitutional law to fester under the porch like a dead raccoon.
By *not* killing bad law, our nation is still saddled with bad law from the time of FDR and LBJ. Had the justices thought strategically like Roberts, our country would not be nearing bankruptcy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.