To: Renfield; SunkenCiv; blam
The associated fauna - notably some voles' teeth, show that the site is to be dated to a period before the 'Anglian' or 'Great' ice age, and should therefore be around 500,000 years old... Should!
There's also could-be would-be and may-be...
16 posted on
10/05/2007 7:42:12 PM PDT by
Fred Nerks
(Fair dinkum!)
To: Fred Nerks
The associated fauna - notably some voles' teeth, show that the site is to be dated to a period before the 'Anglian' or 'Great' ice age, and should therefore be around 500,000 years old... Should!
There's also could-be would-be and may-be...
So you are going to correct experts in Pleistocene marker fauna on the basis of ... ?
17 posted on
10/05/2007 8:11:48 PM PDT by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: Fred Nerks; Coyoteman; Renfield; blam
Boxgrove, just outside Chichester
That triggered a recollection, but I'd not time to share it before. It comes from a friend, who read it in a book by Alan Watts, I believe.
There was a young lady of Chichester
whose good looks make the saints in their niches stir
one Sunday at Mass
the curve of her ass
made the Bishop of Chichester's britches stir.
Good to recite that one slowly, but the temptation on the last line is to gallop like a horse. :')
23 posted on
10/05/2007 10:07:41 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
(Profile updated Friday, October 5, 2007. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson