"Brandon fired at Larry a second time, tossed the gun on the ground and calmly walked through the classroom door."
Posted on 07/20/2008 9:25:44 PM PDT by Marie2
I can't believe the kids at school were expected to tolerate his sexual harassment, either.
Another victim of the gay agenda, IMO. Once the adults are thoroughly taken in, we move on to the children, I guess.
Wow! They got it down to a decimal point. That is some real dedicated studying there, studiers.
A tragedy, but I can understand how the young, immature shooter might be provoked if he was hit on by the sexually confused boy.
The homosexual boy should have been disciplined or prosecuted for sexual harassment.
The kid was obviously starved for attention, like so many other kids his age. This does NOT mean that he should be killed just because some mouth breather hated his lifestyle.
If he merely flirted, then nothing should have been done. If it was part of an aggressive pattern of harassment, then yes, he should have been disciplined.
The "macho" punk who shot him deserves a pineapple up his a-s. If the kid was truly aggressive, a fist to the head would have been sufficient. Methinks someone was uncomfortable with his own sexuality.
The kid was obviously starved for attention, like so many other kids his age. This does NOT mean that he should be killed just because some mouth breather hated his lifestyle.
I dont think that it was the lifestyle, I think it was the harrassment.
(Lawrence) "King, 15, was declared brain-dead and was expected to be taken off a ventilator late Thursday so organs could be removed for donation... King was shot in the head early Tuesday in a classroom full of students at E.O. Green Junior High School."
Did you read the article? Nowhere does it mention that Brandon hated Larry’s “lifestyle”.
Larry was an annoying little twerp. If he crossed the line into aggressive harassment, then discipline was needed.
Methinks little Brandon was insecure and needed to prove his manhood. He won't be the first to go to the pokey for letting testosterone get in the way of reasoning (nor will he be the last).
Had you read the article, you would not have made this statement.
After reading the article...being a distracting gay was the least of his problems.
Yes, I went back and reviewed the article. His actions were like that of an aggressive panhandler and (as I said in my last post) he should have been disciplined. The kid who shot him, however, remains lower than an animal, IMHO.
It went far beyond annoying, and with the apparent approval of an assistant principal.
So, what would you charge him with. Involuntary manslaughter might be appropriate. Never going to get first or second degree murder in this situation.
I think your analysis is right on the money.
If the homosexual boy had received some appropriate therapy, the shooter likely wouldn’t have shot him. The shooter is no more screwed up than the homosexual boy.
This is such an incredibly sad story. Both these kids came from absolutely horrible homes. There were teachers who were truly concerned about the victim but,sadly,there were others only interested in using him to promote an agenda.
Id say he sounded more like an obessive stalker. Im not saying this young man deserved to die, however his actions justified a much stronger response from the administration. Supposing he had been straight and the object of his affection a female, would the adminstration have treated him the same way? Also, apparently the shooter came from a less than stellar enviroment as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.