Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court won’t hear sperm donor suit
Boston Globe ^ | 10/1/2009 | John R. Ellement

Posted on 10/01/2009 8:34:23 PM PDT by Saije

The state Appeals Court asked lawmakers yesterday to take on complex legal questions now surfacing about anonymous sperm donors and the children conceived through science.

In a ruling issued yesterday, the court refused to become involved in a Suffolk Probate and Family Court case in which the mother of twin daughters, known only as Jane Doe, is demanding that the New England Cryogenic Center Inc. identify a sperm donor known only as D237...

Jane Doe represented herself before the court and could not be reached for comment.

...according to McHugh’s ruling, D237 sold his sperm between 1992 and 1994 when he was in his 20s and a Boston medical student...

Jane Doe purchased the sperm in 1999. She was artificially inseminated in a London hospital and gave birth to twin daughters on Feb. 2, 2001. In 2005, she asked New England Cryogenic for D237’s identity, which the center refused to provide. She was evicted from her London home and moved back to the United States, the court said.

In 2006, Jane Doe sought the donor’s identity so he could be required to pay child support and to provide updated genetic information because the twin girls had been diagnosed with “ectodermal dysplasia, from which she claims the twins are suffering and for which genetic information from both parents may be helpful in treating.’’

Ectodermal dysplasia is a group of conditions in which there is abnormal development of the skin, hair, nails, teeth, or sweat glands.

Jane Doe voluntarily placed the twins in the custody of the state Department of Children and Families.

A guardian ad litem, or person appointed by the court to represent the minors, will investigate the health of the girls and undertake a possible search for a genetic link to D237.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: boston; childsupport; court; spermdonor
Unless I'm misreading this article this woman doesn't even have the children anymore. But can you imagine being that former student who was probably just looking for a way to make some quick cash and years later have this woman and her twins show up at the door looking for child support?
1 posted on 10/01/2009 8:34:23 PM PDT by Saije
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Saije

Artificial insemination is immoral and unnatural. Both the father and the mother have committed a sin.


2 posted on 10/01/2009 8:40:29 PM PDT by pleasenoobama (Liberals lied, small government died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saije
In 2006, Jane Doe sought the donor’s identity so he could be required to pay child support

Exactly why I will never donate sperm.

3 posted on 10/02/2009 12:17:24 AM PDT by Slings and Arrows (Crazy is the new sane.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saije

I almost hope she wins. Putting the sperm banks out of business would be a good thing since they seem to be used mostly by crazy single women and lesbians.


4 posted on 10/02/2009 5:06:44 AM PDT by Ford4000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson