Posted on 06/14/2010 10:26:30 AM PDT by raymcc
The former Honolulu elections clerk who says President Obama was “definitely” not born in Hawaii and has no birth certificate from any hospital in the Aloha State says he’s willing to testify in court to those facts.
“The things I’ve said, I don’t mind testifying in court,” Tim Adams, the senior elections clerk for the city and county of Honolulu in the 2008 campaign, told WND in an exclusive interview.
(Excerpt) Read more at americangrandjury.org ...
Well, if the man’s this certain, where was he two years ago?
Well, if the man’s this certain, where was he two years ago?
I will testify that Julius Caesar had a third nipple. My proof? No one has ever provided proof that he didn’t.
What is that rule about proving a negative?
Watch this guy have an “accident” ala Vince Foster or Ron Brown.
Obama can’t organize a child’s party let alone a hit on someone.
Worth repeating.
;-)
Who IS this creature esconced in the Oval Office?
Not one of us.
He doesn’t have to. He has plenty of friends from Chicago he can delegate the task to.
Sorry, I am calling BS on this.
IF ist wasn’t in there, betcha one is in there now.
He signed an NDA, which has now lapsed. Now he is free to speak, whereas before he couldn’t.
This should be easy to check.
There are two hospitals in question. They should all have logs or records of who was admitted and for what. There can’t have been more than a dozen births at each hospital over a two day period around Obama’s birth.
Match up all the admitted women in labor with actual births and birth certificates.
If the birthers are right then there should be (X) number of births and (X-1) number of admitted women in labor.
QED.
This should be interesting then.
As for myself, and believe me, I am no fan of Mr. Obama’s,
this birth certificate business seems way out there.
Sealed!!! Covered up!
He should put down what he knows in an affidavit — sign it — and put it in the hands of the legal teams with active cases.
Sealed!!! Covered up!
“Sounds like someone looking for publicity. If he is so sure about 0bama not being born in Hawaii where was he in 2008? And even then, what would be stopping him from doing it now? Why does he have to threaten to do such a thing, why not just do it?”
Although I wished this was true, I’m inclined to think it is bogus. This fellow really was part of the office that checks things (WND verified that), but if you read the article he only claims his supervisor and other higher ups said President Obama had no BC. His “testimony” is hearsay. I’m pretty sure that “hearsay” carries no weight in a court. Plus, he superiors can just say they never told him any such thing.
Now does this give one some reasonable pause that it may be true. Well yes, depending on your inclinations to believe it. However, is it insufficient evidence to accomplish anything but keepin those alread inclined to believe Mr. Obama was not born in Hawaii to keep believing so? Personnally, I don’t know.
I wished they could prove he wasn’t born in Hawaii or that there is no real documentation that he was (a witnessing physician or midwife). It could just be his mother or grandmother simply requesting a BC to ensure U.S. citizenship and the benefits associated with it. The lack of official documents that he was born in Hawaii does not mean he wasn’t born there....he could have in born at home or in a stable in Wakiki beach! That may well be the situation, if there is a lack of hospital birth record. This would explain his reluctance to release the long form. It may not exist and it would create doubts.
However, the lack of a long form only create doubt...he could still have been born in Hawaii.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.