Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

There is no question that Dorner snapped and went off the deep end. His actions during the ten days demonstrated he had a hatred for cops, but compassion for civilians not connected to law enforcement.
The incident begs for a review of what really happened that caused LAPD to take away his livelihood and future. Was the incident involving the training officer part of a pattern, or a one-time he said, she said, event.
Cops protect their own and their favored officers. A fair and impartial review of all involved is the only thing that will put this unfortunate incident to rest, along with appropriate action if Dorner was indeed treated unfairly. If, in fact, the assertions in Dorner’s manifesto are even partially true, there is no way he could appeal outside the police department to get a fair and impartial review, short of the extreme measures of which we’re all now familiar.


13 posted on 02/16/2013 10:41:57 PM PST by RLM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RLM

>> but compassion for civilians not connected to law enforcement.

Cops are civilians too, and also deserve the due process Dorner was allegedly denied.

When an individual decides his grievances are best expressed through murdering others, the case for mediation is lost.


14 posted on 02/16/2013 10:50:24 PM PST by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RLM

“a hatred for cops, but compassion for civilians not connected to law enforcement.”

He declared war on the wives and children of the LAPD. His first victim was the daughter of an officer.

He was a loser nutcase who got a bad rating and then invented a complaint against the said rater. He was racist to the core.

Any investigation is an insult to the innocent people killed by that POS.


16 posted on 02/16/2013 10:55:33 PM PST by rbmillerjr (We have No Opposition to Obama's Socialist Agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RLM
Dormer's Compassion ended when he shot that young Woman and her “not connected to law enforcement” Fiance Point Blank in the Face.

You have to be one compassionate Obama worshiping Mother*ucker to do something like that. /S

Best you rethink your deep thinking.

18 posted on 02/16/2013 11:05:40 PM PST by Kickass Conservative (I only Fear a Government that doesn't Fear me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RLM

Dorner by his own actions confirmed the good judgement of the LAPD to fire his ass.


19 posted on 02/16/2013 11:17:28 PM PST by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RLM

You write some mean satire.


20 posted on 02/16/2013 11:21:12 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's presidential run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RLM
appropriate action if Dorner was indeed treated unfairly

Who in their lifetime hasn't been treated unfairly? WTF would this world be like if we all responded like Dorner?

21 posted on 02/16/2013 11:25:06 PM PST by Alaska Wolf (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RLM

His training officer writes this guy up and was quite outspoken about his temperament and wrote that he lacked judgment and common sense in the field. Guess what happens next?

This guy files allegations his training officer used excessive force...And he waited *days* to report these allegations, after being critiqued and “written up” by the training officer.

The reason he was fired he found out that his training officer had written him up for his poor performance, he decided to retaliate, making up a story about her kicking a suspect.

Ya see any serious red flags, corruption, dishonesty, character flaws or serious issues in regards to Dorner?


22 posted on 02/16/2013 11:30:54 PM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RLM

This case will never be put to rest. It will probably die out from public exposure like the Rodney King case but will never be put to rest. I am no fan of the USA police forces as I believe that many of the people in the various services were/are would be bullies who now can be under letter of law. However, when an obviously deranged man or woman decides decides/chooses to kill/eliminate some other person including law persons I believe the law has a right if not responsibility to hastily remove that person from danger to anyone else. To argue that such a person deserves legal considerations is sophistry as to another persons right to live free from danger.


25 posted on 02/16/2013 11:37:02 PM PST by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RLM
Lot on it and it went to an appeals court
28 posted on 02/16/2013 11:57:11 PM PST by Rj Snows
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RLM

He was a nut job. Good riddance


44 posted on 02/17/2013 5:28:26 AM PST by Carry me back
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RLM

His treatment was irrelevant in the analysis of the situation. Had he stayed within the bounds of the law, things may have been different. Instead, he decided to become a murderer. There is nothing in any aspect of this situation that deserves discussion, even the stupidity or incompetence of the LAPD in their actions. Those deserve a different discussion. Instead, we get comments like this

“He is a highly trained person with specialized training! They will never find him!”

“He was fighting against injustice in the LAPD!”

“He is miles away from them, probably laughing at them!”

“He has them right where he wants them!”

“If, in fact, the assertions in Dorner’s manifesto are even partially true, there is no way he could appeal outside the police department to get a fair and impartial review, short of the extreme measures of which we’re all now familiar.”

And so on.

In the end, he was just another deranged, violent liberal dipstick who killed innocent people then stumbled and tripped when the noose began tightening.

A 350 pound liberal a-hole who was going to truck around in Big Bear in the winter, covering his tracks in the snow, living under infra-red evading tarps, carrying cans of 50 cal sniper rife ammo with his Barrett slung over one shoulder and a manpad over the other, evading the law like Rambo, etc.

He was a stupid, fat, paranoid slob who didn’t have the brainpower to figure out how to survive NORMALLY in a society created in the image of one HE advocated, if his idiotic “manifesto” was any indication. His “manifesto” was so lame it made The Unabomber’s manifesto look intelligent by comparison.

Well, I give him credit. At least he had two brain cells to rub together which caused his finger trigger to contract while the gun was pointed at his own head.


49 posted on 02/17/2013 6:02:34 AM PST by rlmorel (1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: RLM

They probably fired him because he was A CRAZY NUT JOB! His “manifesto” was nothing but drivel...sort of like the idiots that post “I’m leaving FR” opuses!


73 posted on 02/17/2013 1:02:45 PM PST by Fledermaus (I'm done with the GOP. Let them wither and die. We need to start over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson