Benghazi: Arabic-Language Media Implicates Egypt's Fallen Muslim Brotherhood Regime

Pajamas Media ^ | 8/12/13 | Walid Shoebat

[Ben Barrack]

U.S. officials and experts do acknowledge [1] an Egyptian connection to the Benghazi attacks. They’ll point to what they call a ragtag group of jihadists, led by Muhammad Jamal Abdo Al-Kashif (aka Abu Ahmad), known as the “Jamal network.” However, the U.S. administration downplays this Egyptian connection, whereas several Arabic-language sources reveal a much larger connection. It is significant to point out that the first attack against the U.S. embassies on September 11, 2012, happened in Cairo. Egypt was the spark and Egyptians were the agents of both attacks.

Al-Kashif had been locked up in one of Egypt’s most secure prisons, but he was released by deposed president Mohammad Mursi prior to the attacks. Al-Kashif had been Osama bin Laden’s bodyguard. Mursi was the primary agent behind his release.

Here is Al-Kashif praising Egyptian security [2] for orchestrating his release. Al-Wafd [3] (translated into English) mentions Mursi’s involvement:

Mursi released the most dangerous of terrorists, who have sentences that include death and life imprisonment, as reported by Nour al-Huda Zaki in her report regarding the terms of the exchange. She quoted Karam Zuhdi, of Jama’t Al-Islamieh, saying that he mediated the liberation of soldiers in the Sinai in return for the release of 18 Jihadi inmates. The list included al-Kashif, who was known to have attacked the American embassy in Benghazi. … This is the most distinguished of the entire group who carried out missions in Egypt, Libya, and Yemen. … Allowing the return of 300 from the Jihad and Jama’t Al-Islamieh.

A leaked Libyan intelligence document [4] dated four days after the attacks also implicates Mursi as being involved in Benghazi. (A full translation of this document is available here [5].) The document states that Ansar al-Sharia’s Egypt branch, led by Marjan Salem, was the main player, not...

[Ben Barrack]

If McCain and Graham want to get to the bottom of what happened in Benghazi, why are they seeking the release of Muslim Brotherhood leaders?

[Hotlanta Mike]

But of course, they were sent by Morsi. And Obama is guilty of treason.

[VerySadAmerican]

Blackmail. Is saying BLACKmail racist?

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Bookmarked.

[melancholy]

“Mursi released the most dangerous of terrorists, who have sentences that include death and life imprisonment, “

Now it’s 0b0z0’s turn to return the favor! He’s trying to release the terrorist that released the most dangerous terrorist.

Morsi can implicate 0b0z0,therefore, try to shut him up, one way or the other. IOW, MORSI COULD BE MURDERED IF RELEASED FROM THE SECURE PRISON.

Something to think about.

[LyinLibs]

In Syria, making weapons deals with Al Qaeda terrorists:

[LyinLibs]

[PA Engineer]

Many Freepers knew this from the beginning. Obama, Hillary, Morsi and Abdel-Rahman.

The modus operandi was to never let a good crisis go to waste. This was only part of the operation.

[Nachum]

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

[Paladin2]

The whole “Blackmark” thing is racis’.

[okie01]

In other words, everybody in the Middle East is aware that Benghazi was a failed kidnap operation as agreed to by Mohammed Morsi and the President of the United States.

And that the USA is being played for the fool by the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda.

But Americans don't know squat about what went down because:

1. The MSM isn't about to tell them.

2. And the Republicans aren't too keen on revealing the truth, either.

What a revoltin' development this is...

[InterceptPoint]

In other words, everybody in the Middle East is aware that Benghazi was a failed kidnap operation as agreed to by Mohammed Morsi and the President of the United States.
++++++++++++++++
Actually there is, IMHO, virtually no interest and very little information floating around about who were the Benghazi attackers and what their motivation was for the attack.

For example, at the news conference last week Obama was asked about progress in capturing the attackers. Neither Fox or the MSM would ask the Butch Cassidy and Sundance Kid Question:

WHO ARE THESE GUYS?

And this thread dead-ended at 10 responses. No time to read one of the most important articles yet published on Benghazi. Yes it was a long article. It's a complex story. Nevertheless I'm disappointed in the FR response.

As to our conclusion that Obama agreed to the plan to swap Stevens for the Blind Sheik color me not yet convinced. But a Morsi initiative based on his hope that he could make a deal with Obama is certainly looking more and more likely everyday.

And Egyptian/Morsi involvement now looks to be very, very likely.

Be aware of a possible alternate theory: Morsi plus al Qaeda raiding the Consulate and Annex to secure surface to air missiles. A couple of threads on that subject today.

[okie01]

As to our conclusion that Obama agreed to the plan to swap Stevens for the Blind Sheik color me not yet convinced. But a Morsi initiative based on his hope that he could make a deal with Obama is certainly looking more and more likely everyday.

And Egyptian/Morsi involvement now looks to be very, very likely.

There's no proof -- as yet -- of any kidnapping plot. I understand that.

But something was going on in Benghazi that the administration is at great pains to avoid revealing. Gun-running alone is not a sufficient transgression to warrant the cover-up that's been mounted. As a defense, all they would have to do is shout "Iran-Contra" -- and all possible political penalty would melt away.

No, there has to be something bigger at work here. And a staged kidnapping and subsequent prisoner exchange seems to fit the known facts (and/or rumors). Though, I'll grant, it could well be something even more horrendous...