Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bloomberg, Moms Demand Action: Background Checks Don't Work, Pass More Background Checks
Bretibart.com ^ | 12/24/2013 | AWR Hawkins

Posted on 12/24/2013 9:45:24 AM PST by rktman

On December 23, Michael Bloomberg and Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense America's (MDA) Shannon Watts co-authored an op-ed claiming criminals circumvent our current background check system; ergo, the United States needs more background checks.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: banglist; bloomberg; didiots; dummie; guncontrol
And a Merry Christmas to all. Keep up the good fight.
1 posted on 12/24/2013 9:45:24 AM PST by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rktman

Absolutely! I’m sure the criminals will comply! Problem solved.


2 posted on 12/24/2013 9:46:57 AM PST by poobear (Socialism in the minds of the elites, is a con-game for the serfs, nothing more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poobear

Women pushed Prohibition way back when. Husbands were spending the family paycheck at the bars. Didn’t work then.


3 posted on 12/24/2013 9:55:47 AM PST by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

President elect Elizabeth Warren will make smiling at a woman a hate crime.


4 posted on 12/24/2013 10:05:11 AM PST by ConservativeStatement ("World Peace 1.20.09.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman
Gee! I read the headline and I immediately thought this was about the epidemic of government teachers sexually abusing their students.

Background checks for sexual predators in the schools? Heck no! ( Not important.)

Taking guns away from the law abiding? That's the Progs most important issue. ( And.. people wonder why liberalism is a mental disorder?)

5 posted on 12/24/2013 10:12:31 AM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

These issues with Moms supporting all forms of big government control are best left our sister female Freepers to address.


6 posted on 12/24/2013 10:19:14 AM PST by Dr. Pritchett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

1) Well, as soon as the president submits to one...
2) You mean laws prevent crimes? That gun-free school zone worked so well in Littleton, Colorado last week.
3) Isn’t insanity the act of doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result?
When you’re out of new ideas, just reboot old ones that didn’t work.


7 posted on 12/24/2013 10:20:48 AM PST by VideoPaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VideoPaul

2. Cenntinal(sp) I think.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.


8 posted on 12/24/2013 10:25:47 AM PST by rktman (Under my plan(scheme), the price of EVERYTHING will necessarily skyrocket! Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: poobear

Soon New York voters will rid themselves of this little moran, the problem is that they have not learned their lesson well as they have elected an even more moronic mayor.

There si no cure for stupid as can be proven by the New York voters who voted for their new mayor.


9 posted on 12/24/2013 10:28:20 AM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chiefqc

I had planned on staying away from NY anyways.


10 posted on 12/24/2013 10:34:16 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rktman

What’s that definition of insanity again?


11 posted on 12/24/2013 10:35:46 AM PST by Let's Roll (Save the world's best healthcare - REPEAL, DEFUND Obamacare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20

Excellent plan.


12 posted on 12/24/2013 10:46:12 AM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman

And the definition of insanity is - to keep doing the same thing over and over, in hopes that THIS time, it will work.

Background checks are not particularly effective, but they do serve to provide an obstacle in the free exercise of the right to keep and bear arms. Simply calling some program a “background check” does not assure that the probable factors that lead to misuse of firearms are or may be considered. Some very slight misdemeanors are considered to be a “threat”, while other peculiarities are totally overlooked. Mostly, these things are instituted because of a total misunderstanding of what the concept of self-defense involves.

The police force is not and cannot be the personal guardian of each one of us. They can pursue and capture criminals, but they cannot prevent the commission of a crime, except in very rare and exceptional circumstances. Self-defense is the first and sometimes only line of defense.

There are other and perhaps mostly effective forms of self-defense, the primary objective is to discourage or disable the potential attacker. Not all forms of self-defense involve use of a firearm, but there has to be some means of regaining superiority over the attacker.

And if that is a .38 slug through the heart, so be it.


13 posted on 12/24/2013 10:51:38 AM PST by alloysteel (Those who deny natural climate change are forever doomed to stupidity. AGW is a LIE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Okay so a bunch of women want to infringe our rights, I mean Bloomberg and other women.


14 posted on 12/24/2013 12:16:17 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DIRTYSECRET

Morons are never right.


15 posted on 12/24/2013 10:04:53 PM PST by poobear (Socialism in the minds of the elites, is a con-game for the serfs, nothing more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Cops in New York Using Gun Classifieds Site ARMSLIST To Trap Gun Owners? Maybe.
December 24 2013
by Dan Cannon
Share This Post

This interesting post on ARMSLIST was brought to our attention by a reader.

Here is the text from the ad, posted from an anonymous account (spelling errors part of original post),

BEWARE THERES A SCUMBAG ON HERE SELLING MULTIPLE CALS IN ROCHESTER AND SURROUNDING AREAS!! THIS SCUMBAG AGREED TO MEET THEN I WAS SURROUNDED BY POLICE. THEY SIMPLY INTERIGATED ME AND CHECKED MY PERSONALS. THEY ARE ROUNDING UP GUN OWNERS TO SEE WHAT YOUR BUYING AND WHAT YOU MAY BE FEEDING,ALONG WITH RECORDING YOUR VEHICLE INFORMATION WHICH LEADS TO RESIIDENCE… THIS GUY HAS MANY POSTINGS OF FIREARMS AND RANTING POSTS I ASSUME TO BLEND IN WITH THE CROWD. THESE COMMUNISTS PIGS ARE GETTING SMARTER EVERYDAY! DONT BUY AMMO ON ARMS LIST UNLESS ITS FROM A REPUTABLE DEALER. IF YOU PICS OF AMMO CANS OR BOXES OF AMMO TAKEN OFF THE INTERNET…STAY AWAY. MY ENTIRE NIGHT WAS WASTED AND NOW THEY HAVE MY PERSONAL INFO ..I REPEAT DO NOT BUY FROM THESE CLOWNS THERE RECORDING EVERYONE TO STRIP YOU IN THE FUTURE AND ARREST NON COMPLIANT AND REGISTERED ARMS AS FOR THE GUY POSTING THESE ROT IN HELL.

Hmmm, definitely interesting to say the least.

On some level it seems to make sense if you want to catch gun owners with unlicensed guns in a state with registration.

Remember, New York has a gun registry. Attempting to buy 9mm ammo but the only gun you have registered is a .45. Could that be enough for cops to search your home? In pretty much every other state I’d say absolutely not, but remember this is New York we’re talking about.

It was widely reported a couple of weeks ago that New York City residents had started receiving surrender/confiscation notices about long guns that might be illegal under city law, so perhaps there is a state wide crack down on guns.

Of course, we have no way to verify whether this post is true or if it’s just some classic interwebz trolling.

http://gunssavelives.net/news/cops-in-new-york-using-gun-classifieds-site-armslist-to-trap-gun-owners-maybe/


16 posted on 12/25/2013 7:25:58 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The fastest and surest way to Create Criminal Thugs is to increase the amount of SINGLE MOTHERS, Shouldn’t their focus be on Banning SINGLE MOTHERHOOD???


17 posted on 12/28/2013 4:58:12 AM PST by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Of course. That’s why the gop-e is waging a war on women. HUH?


18 posted on 12/28/2013 5:39:04 AM PST by rktman (Under my plan(scheme), the price of EVERYTHING will necessarily skyrocket! Period.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson