Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

>>IOW, no. And 25 wasn’t the expected life span for that era.

http://books.google.com/books?id=vh3pmAodawEC&pg=PA144#v=onepage&q&f=false

Yes, it was.


7 posted on 11/02/2014 7:56:43 PM PST by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: struggle; SunkenCiv
Hockey stick statistics.

I'll go with Sunken on this.

9 posted on 11/02/2014 8:36:59 PM PST by kiryandil (making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: struggle; SunkenCiv
struggle: "Yes, it was."

From your link: "What the evidence supports is a population in which average life expectancy at age 10 was approximately 35 to 37 years.
This figure may be taken, I think, as relatively secure for the general Roman population, with an exception being made only for the affluent elite whose life expectancy may well have been considerably higher."

So, if we may suppose a cemetery of mostly "affluent elite", then an average age there of 45 might not be so unexpected.

11 posted on 11/03/2014 4:42:25 AM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: struggle
Yes, it was.

AT BIRTH.

If you made it through childhood, and avoided an accidental death, war or murder, it was a lot closer to the three score and ten the Bible reckons.

15 posted on 11/03/2014 5:46:22 AM PST by null and void (If a quarantine saves just one child's life, it's worth it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson