Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Beyond “Fermi’s Paradox” II: Questioning the Hart-Tipler Conjecture
universetoday.com ^ | Paul Patton

Posted on 04/10/2015 11:52:04 AM PDT by BenLurkin

The argument claiming that extraterrestrials don’t exist was actually proposed by the astronomer Michael Hart, in a paper he published in 1975. Hart supposed that if an extraterrestrial civilization arose in the galaxy it would develop interstellar travel and launch colonizing expeditions to nearby stars. These colonies would, in turn, launch their own starships spreading a wave of colonization across the galaxy.

How long would the wave take to cross the galaxy? Assuming that the starships traveled at one tenth the speed of light and that no time was lost in building new ships upon arriving at the destination, the wave, Hart surmised, could cross the galaxy in 650,000 years.

Even allowing for a modicum of time for each colony to establish itself before building more ships, the galaxy could be crossed in two million years, a miniscule interval on a cosmic or evolutionary timescale. Hart asserted that because extraterrestrials aren’t already here on Earth, none exist in our galaxy.

Hart’s argument was extended by cosmologist Frank Tipler in 1980. Tipler supposed that alien colonists would be assisted by self-reproducing robots. His conclusion was announced in the title of his paper ‘Extraterrestrial intelligent beings do not exist’.

Why is it important that Hart’s argument wasn’t really also formulated by the eminent Enrico Fermi? Because Fermi’s name lends a credibility to the argument that it might not deserve. Supporters of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) want to search for evidence that alien civilizations exist by using radio telescopes to listen for radio messages that extraterrestrials may have transmitted into space. Interstellar signaling is vastly cheaper than a starship, and is feasible with technology we have today.

(Excerpt) Read more at universetoday.com ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: enricofermi; fermiparadox; fermisparadox; franktipler; harttiplerconjecture; michaelhart; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 04/10/2015 11:52:04 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: whodathunkit

ping


2 posted on 04/10/2015 11:54:19 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“Extraterrestrial intelligent beings do not exist” or interstellar travel will never be feasible at least to much extent.


3 posted on 04/10/2015 11:55:03 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkepley

We are the interstellar species that will inhabit the universe. We are not yet around for a million years. If we continue to exist as a species we will inhabit the known universe.


4 posted on 04/10/2015 11:58:42 AM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; All
1. Why would an advanced civilization require vehicles?

2. What would an advanced civilization desire or require from the equivalent of rats, if we're lucky?

It's like dating in high school. The troglodyte rarely scores the Prom Queen. Nothing in common.

5 posted on 04/10/2015 12:01:17 PM PDT by j.argese (/s tags: If you have a mind unnecessary. If you're a cretin it really doesn't matter, does it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
"Stupid Humans Will Never Figure It Out!"


6 posted on 04/10/2015 12:04:27 PM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Once again... We don’t know everything there is about science- mathematically it IS possible to do faster than light travel.

From ancient records it is obvious SOMEONE was here that they talked about coming “from the heavens”

And Bob Lazar saw their gravity propulsion systems, and I believe him (seriously, I do)


7 posted on 04/10/2015 12:06:09 PM PDT by Mr. K (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Fermi's credentials were of the highest order, both as an experimentalist and a theorist; a very rare creature, indeed. However, the Fermi Paradox isn't taken seriously because of his name. It's taken seriously because it's a legitimate question to ask: it's a confrontational challenge to blithe assumptions. The serious follow-up research is all that matters. Hart and Tipler offer one quantified scenario that has to be answered by SETI researchers. There are others.

The so-called Drake Equation isn't taken seriously because the name is attached to a prominent SETI pioneer. It's not taken seriously because it's nothing more than a WAG, and everyone who understands quantified science knows it.

8 posted on 04/10/2015 12:07:19 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47 -- with leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Truly stupid arguments!
you do not know when the first intelligent beings first started the conquest of the galaxy. They could be starting just about now and will be here in 2 million year.

at 10% of the speed of light, how long would it take us to reach the next closest solar system?

We may be the first intelligent life form that will conquer the galaxy.

etc. etc.


9 posted on 04/10/2015 12:09:04 PM PDT by dirtymac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
mathematically it IS possible to do faster than light travel.

"Mathematically" means nothing. The question is, is this physically possible. The answer to that question is no.

10 posted on 04/10/2015 12:10:06 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47 -- with leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: j.argese
It's like dating in high school. The troglodyte rarely scores the Prom Queen. Nothing in common.

The difference is, that the troglodyte and prom queen pass each other all the time in the halls, and, given the intelligence of most prom queens probably have a lot of classes in common.

In your analogy, the trogs are sitting in their little enclave in the cafeteria. Somebody mentions the prom queens in movies and asserts that the odds are millions to one that they must exist. The Fermi troglodyte replies: "how come there aren't any in our school?"

11 posted on 04/10/2015 12:15:07 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47 -- with leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

We are, without a doubt, a very impatient species. Modern science is not quite 250 years old with a tremendous leap forward beginning in the first half of the 20th century. Look at where technology was just 10 years ago compared with now. We are just scratching the surface in the discovery of and study of planets circling other stars.

Yet there are many voices saying that anything other than earth is a waste of time and money to explore. Heal Gaia and ignore the rest? Not only that, a lot of so called ecologists advocate killing off 90 to 100% of us to save the earth.


12 posted on 04/10/2015 12:17:10 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtymac
At 10% of the speed of light, how long would it take us to reach the next closest solar system.

Forty years.

The likelihood that we are the first intelligent life in the galaxy is astronomically small. So is the probability that no one has reached us over the course of the last few hundred thousand years. Unless... there are unknown factors which make life much less probable than the best conjectures.

13 posted on 04/10/2015 12:19:04 PM PDT by FredZarguna (It looks just like a Telefunken U-47 -- with leather.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

what would an advanced, intelligent species want with us lowly primitives (other than, perhaps, to “serve mankind” ... for dinner)?


14 posted on 04/10/2015 12:22:33 PM PDT by faithhopecharity (A brilliantly intelligent comment sent thru an amazingly stupid spell checker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The Milky Way is 100,000 ly across, so traveling at 1/10 the speed of light that’s 1 million years not 650,000. Plus of course there’s the assumption of no “distractions” which doesn’t really hold water. Plus of course even if somebody went across who says they come to here. And colonization takes a lot longer than merely travel. And we don’t know when they started, if they started on this 1 million year journey 750,000 years ago they’re “almost” here... and we won’t encounter them for many times our recorded history.


15 posted on 04/10/2015 12:24:48 PM PDT by discostu (Bobby, I'm sorry you have a head like a potato.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell
If advanced technological civilization continues to exist, we will possibly explore a tiny portion of the galaxy. However, all complex systems break down over time, and the more complicated the system, the more likely it will eventually fail.

The collapse of world civilization is only a few large-scale crop failures away, probably only one such event. With mega-cities in the future of 50-million or more inhabitants there would be chaos on unprecedented levels and no amount of police or military power with the ability to control it. This chaos would further disrupt distribution patterns and contribute to more breakdown. Population levels dropping precipitously would bring down the standard of living and blunt technological advance. Population growth and high living standards go hand-in-hand due to division of labor.

Ergo, the likelihood we will end up like Captain Kirk and Co. jetting around the universe at hyper-light speed is probably nil. The likely scenario is a fragmented world of warring tribes living amidst the ruins of once mighty cities.
16 posted on 04/10/2015 12:25:50 PM PDT by attiladhun2 (The Free World has a new leader--his name is Benjamin Netanyahu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The odds are overwhelmingly that they have been here for some time.

The odds are also that we would not see them unless they wanted to be seen.

Finally, if you were them, would you want to be seen by us?


17 posted on 04/10/2015 12:31:08 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: attiladhun2

Can’t get past today?


18 posted on 04/10/2015 12:31:36 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Even an ordinary, intelligent person could probably make a half decent guesstimate on the *possibility* of life elsewhere, with a limited set of variables. Comparing life elsewhere with Earth is problematic, though, because of our “extinction events”, that result in evolutionary “reboots”.

“In the past 540 million years there have been five major events when over 50% of animal species died.” And while human beings breed *a lot*, this cannot be assumed to be a common quality of intelligent animals. Humans have never had to endure an extinction event.

Another down factor are “cosmic” extinction events, like supernovas, that can sterilize a large sector of space to the point where there are no surviving microorganisms.

There is also a good theory that in a galaxy, life can only exist about 3/4ths of the way away from the galactic center. Not too near and not too far away. Like us, on a branch of a spiral, in a quiet enough part of the galaxy to thrive for a while.

In any event, assuming the life of the Milky Way galaxy is about 14 billion years, if you plot where the supernovas have been in say the last 500 million years, to eliminate them from where life is likely to be, then adjust for about 3/4ths of the way away from the galactic center, you have likely eliminated 99 out of 100 places to look.

Then you get to the intelligent life problem, basically, how long to intelligent species last before they either revert to a more primitive state, or just die out? This is the 14 billion year problem.

If intelligent species only last 100,000 years on average, they are biological “flashes in the pan”. But if they are as durable as horseshoe crabs or coelacanth fish, at 450 and 400 million years, respectively, then they have a good chance to at least make their mark in the universe.

About a 1 in 35 chance, that it. 400 million into 14 billion.


19 posted on 04/10/2015 12:37:16 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy ("Don't compare me to the almighty, compare me to the alternative." -Obama, 09-24-11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FredZarguna
A man from my town, 1937 Corinth HS graduate, was one of Fermi's assistants at the Nuclear Fission Test in Chicago and was one of the signers of the Chianti Bottle. He later was over ORNL, taught at Vanderbilt and Princeton, was a guest of Niels Borr for a year as a lecturer, and recently passed away. Those that were Fermi's intellectual equals possessed IQ’s far past the norm.
20 posted on 04/10/2015 12:41:05 PM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson