Posted on 04/27/2015 3:26:01 PM PDT by passionfruit
They just affirm what many of us have already believed.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Citizen Journalist, Ryan Sorba recently went undercover in Palm Springs, California, posing as a same-sex marriage activist. He asked the following question: “Do you believe being gay is strictly genetic?” The video enclosed in this email is a montage of clips from interviews in which gays admit that they believe they are gay due external circumstances, such as being sexually abused at an early age or going through other traumatic experiences. When asked how many interviews Sorba obtained during this venture, he answered, “There are many more to come.” This video is a crucial component to the upcoming Supreme Court marriage decision because it gives natural marriage proponents what they need to neutralize any personal testimony that being gay is an immutable characteristic such as race.
(Excerpt) Read more at clashdaily.com ...
For your ping list
Catholic priests, gay scout leaders, and NAMBLA members agree. They were made that way....
If it WAS genetic, it would have died out a long time ago.
The whole point of natural selection and evolution is to perpetuate the genes. Every organism does this.
A gene that leads to no offspring is by definition dysgenic.
I’m just shocked that there are people on the planet that don’t genuinely know this. I mean anyone with a gay person in their life knows this. It’s like knowing the sun rises in the morning. I’m just shocked that so many people find reasons to excuse reality and that people need video. As if that will derail the agenda.
it doesn’t matter what they say- the gays who won’t admit it will just lie and claim that they weren’t ‘real homosexuals’ In the first place- The gay agenda will not suffer from that admission by those showing it is a choice- You simply can NOT shame a liberal or a homosexual because they have answers to everything ie: “Well they weren’t real homosexuals to begin with, they were just confused, or experimenting’
It’s just like trying to fight the ‘man-caused’ global warming crowd- no matter what you say- they will claim it’s caused by man- without any proof- and they will NEVER let the issue die no matter how much proof comes out against it
[[The whole point of natural selection and evolution is to perpetuate the genes.]]
Exactly- the whole point of NS is ‘survival of the fittest’ and the fittest are those that are capable of passing along their fit genes to the next generation- something homosexuality is incapable of doing-
However, the gaystapo will just claim the gay gene is a leftover mutation that just happened to survive somehow-
You can’t win with the gaystapo
Every gay male i know admits to having been molested by an older male.
They often couch it in romantic terminology, but ultimately it’s revealed as homosexual pedophilic rape.
Grooming. Old as the Greeks. Likely since the dawn of ‘civilized’ man.
Big business says it’s genetic. Any other story is not allowed.
That’s my experience as well. Usually they were abused as children, and/or they had a very distant or negative relationship with their father.
Of course the APA can’t say it’s psychological since they caved decades ago to the militants.
It’s called “recruitment”...
Doesn’t really matter.
What’s right or wrong doesn’t depend on it.
[[“survival of the fittest?” I know what you mean but the phrase is a tautology, it explains nothing, proves nothing, such is evolution]]
They mean it to mean macroevolution, but survival of the fittest is actual a microevolution concept- not macro- in macro- one species is supposed to evolve into a completely different species- something that has never been proven- in microevolution, a scientific fact, species adapt to their environments, and the fittest pass along their genes to the next generation and so on and so forth until the fittest thrive (an example would be hummingbirds on an island whose beaks are longer and longer as time goes on because the flowers on the island have deeper and deeper nectar- those with shorter beaks will die off while the birds with longer ones will be able to get at nectar and survive and pass along their genes- this is microevolution, (survival of the fittest) but it is NOT macroevolution- a scientific impossibility- The hummingbird remains a humming bird and isn’t passing along non species specific genes, which would be an absolute necessity IF macroevolution were to happen- NO new non species specific information is being passed along- but that is an issue for another thread
This doesn't quite scan. Gay scout leaders say they were "made" gay, NAMBLA members say they were "made" pedophiles, Catholic priests say they were "made" Catholic?
It's incoherent.
What are you getting at?
Bkmrk.
The last thing the mutant lobby wants is to have their deviancy measured in such a way that it could be aborted out of existence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.