Apparently, fish won’t eat the part of the food covered by a shoe. I saw this somewhere - there were several feet that had been found that were still in shoes. Almost all were identified by DNA and they were known to have drowned or fAllen off of a boat.
I’m not saying you are wrong, it would seem plausible, I guess. But how come these stories seem to come from the same area? I mean if everyone who is lost/drowned/disposed of at sea wearing shoes has their feet preserved, why does the media only pick it up in one area? Or has there been stories of feet in shoes being discovered all along and it’s just reported as ‘body parts’ or something? Are these feet all wearing a specific type of shoe or something?
Freegards