Posted on 07/10/2016 7:51:38 AM PDT by rktman
Is taking Black Lives Matter organizers at face value on tragedies like the latest one in Dallas going to become the next mainstream media trend?
Is the end of the story on cop killing always going to be about the one that got away?
Will the media continue to legitimize BLM activists like Rev. Jeff Hood with prime time television interviews within 24 hours of the very day that five courageous police officers lost their lives with seven more wounded?
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
,,,,,, hoodwinked hell ,,,, the media loves these jokers ,,, that’s where their talking points come from .
There, fixed the headline. And the answer is Yes.
The local news interviewed a bunch of the young #BLM types who were wanting to shut down the Connector (I-75/85 where they combine through the heart of Atlanta, so two Interstate highways) Friday evening. To listen to them, you would think they were living in Bull Conner’s Birmingham of 1963. It is hard to take them seriously, but we must.
I don’t care if they want to protest but when they start interfering with other peoples lives and livelihood ......they lose support quickly.
IIt’s hard to hoodwink a willing accomplish.
The 'press' gets their stories from democrat opposition research groups... (via local insider contacts) The press lacks the wit to actually go out into the community and find the truth on their own. So yeah, the bullshit will be front and center in the MSM from here until they finally go out of business because NO ONE - absolutely no one - will trust them.
Yep—Sheep willingly be led to slaughter.
When I saw him for the first time I noticed the hood talk and was wondering what the hell is this! Sounds like a white Jesse Jackson/Al Sharpton/Jeremiah Wright wannabe. Creepy and dangerous and needs watching. Gives me chills just looking at him........brrrr
The “press” had all the details on the Philando Castile case. They got them from a reliable source. Who was that? Why, it was Diamond Reynolds. She wouldn’t lie would she. Reporting on this incident was designed to arouse passions. The degenerates in the media got what they wanted. Now five officers are dead and this is only the beginning.
Why is he being referred to as “rev?”
Because it's an honorary title you can bestow on yourself? I sure don't know.
My question was a little obtuse, sorry. I meant to imply that he, along with sharpton and jackson, doesn’t deserve the respect the title bestows, even if he may have completed some sort of accredited seminary training.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.