Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

But collecting non-deposited bottles and returning them to a state that refunds against deposited bottles is fraud. I don’t think anyone worries about a few here or there, but to intentionally try to profit across state lines is abusive and upends the recycling efforts of the state collecting and refunding deposits.


14 posted on 07/26/2016 9:18:38 PM PDT by Reno89519 (It is very simple, Trump/Pence or Clinton/Kaine. Good riddance Lyn' Ted, we regret ever knowing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Reno89519

Yes, by all means upend the government’s ‘recycling” scam.

That is a good thing.


17 posted on 07/26/2016 9:21:09 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Reno89519

“...upends the recycling efforts of the state collecting and refunding deposits.”

And that is bad because . . .


31 posted on 07/26/2016 9:39:28 PM PDT by ModelBreaker (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Reno89519

Government is the greediest, most corrupt and murderous force on Earth. It’s not even debatable.

Yet some people still have a religious faith in government.


52 posted on 07/27/2016 4:42:10 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Reno89519

I respectfully disagree. The history of the Michigan law and debate shows the intent of the law was to protect the environment by reducing waste and litter, protecting the environment, and encouraging companies that manufacture recycled products to locate in Michigan.

If Michign was sincere about the intent then they should encourage people from anywhere to return recycled bottles to Michigan. While the first part of the intent, reducing litter, does not apply to bottles from outside the state the remaining goals are met.

Does the state not force companies to spend billions to reduce pollutants that otherwise would go by air to other states?


56 posted on 07/27/2016 5:44:16 AM PDT by georgiarat (Obama, providing incompetence since Day One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson