Posted on 09/26/2016 6:25:40 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
‘... the treaty at that time was firmly rejected by congress on a bipartisan basis ...’
I don’t know the specifics of the International Telecommunications Union. If China likes it, then there’s a chance it’s involved. ICANN would be a free agent, so our senate would have no say about who they sign a contract with.
‘Local legislators will be contacted. I think they should contact their colleagues on the federal level, too.’
Actually, the spending bill could be voted on any day now. An indirect path might not be ideal at this point.
And even a government shutdown will not cause the contract to expire.
If you mean House members I agree.
Me, myself and I have contacted the US Congress. I wish to engage my state representatives in keeping ICANN in the USofA. They are represented by the same clowns in Washington, DC as I am. ;)
God bless you.
And you even called your state legislators?
If we had done that three months ago it would have been a powerful networking idea.
FRegards ....
[If Obama is for it, it’s probably destructive to America.]
History has proven that, repeatedly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.