Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Repeal 16-17

Actually, they’ve identified the source as previous Clinton person. That’s very different from having weak sources.


19 posted on 10/18/2016 12:13:53 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: conservativepoet

A street walker haiku:

Not into old hags
but at end of day, 20
bucks is 20 bucks


27 posted on 10/18/2016 12:16:08 PM PDT by T-Bone Texan (Don't be a lone wolf. Form up small leaderlesss cells ASAP !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: conservativepoet

An unnamed source is only as reliable as the reporter who is claiming to have verified their info. Since that reporter is the NE, in this case, reliability is mathematically approaching zero.


36 posted on 10/18/2016 12:20:08 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: conservativepoet

Actually, they’ve identified the source as previous Clinton person. That’s very different from having weak sources.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

smells like it could be former xlintonista op, larry Nichols???


61 posted on 10/18/2016 12:30:26 PM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: conservativepoet
Actually, they’ve identified the source as previous Clinton person. That’s very different from having weak sources.

Is the person actually identified?

Without independent verification of the source, and who it says he/she is, this is a nothing-burger.

111 posted on 10/18/2016 1:04:43 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson