Actually, they’ve identified the source as previous Clinton person. That’s very different from having weak sources.
A street walker haiku:
Not into old hags
but at end of day, 20
bucks is 20 bucks
An unnamed source is only as reliable as the reporter who is claiming to have verified their info. Since that reporter is the NE, in this case, reliability is mathematically approaching zero.
Actually, theyve identified the source as previous Clinton person. Thats very different from having weak sources.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
smells like it could be former xlintonista op, larry Nichols???
Is the person actually identified?
Without independent verification of the source, and who it says he/she is, this is a nothing-burger.