Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The 'Heads Up' Podesta Email: DOJ bigwig belongs in jail [aw!m vanity]
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45672 ^

Posted on 11/05/2016 7:37:45 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March

A single Wikileaks email [*a*] reveals that Peter Kadzik belongs in jail, not to mention the others who failed to report the crime.

Look at all who were in on it:

John Podesta personally emailed the tip to:

1. Hillary Clinton

2. Cheryl Mills

3. Another 'id'ed as 'H Samuelson' Mills

4. A number of others who had email accounts in 'Hillary Clinton Dot Com'.

Podesta tipped them off that Peter Kadzik [the DOJ bigwig] had given him a 'heads up':

[quote]

There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil > Division will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department > emails. Another filing in the FOIA case went in last night or will go in > this am that indicates it will be awhile (2016) before the State Department > posts the emails. > >

[unquote]

That, my FRiends, is a crime. It is obstruction of justice. Hillary is a former lawyer and was morally obligated to report this crime to the FBI. Of course even considering her doing such a thing is laughable at this point.

She belongs in jail too. Over this ONE email.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 201611; 20161105; bar; cherylmills; doj; headsup; hillary; hillaryclinton; hsamuelsonmills; kadzik; mills; misconduct; obstruction; obstructionofjustice; peterkadzikpodesta; podesta; samuelsonmills; wikileaks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Direct link to the wikileaks page coming up.

It can really be that simple. Easy to forget.

1 posted on 11/05/2016 7:37:45 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Podesta’s ‘Heads Up’ email

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/45672


2 posted on 11/05/2016 7:38:31 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Hillary's Trickle Up policy: take bribes, sell sleazy pardons, water down AIDS medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Link provided to the ‘Heads Up’ email you mentioned earlier.

Did you realize that Hillary, being a former lawyer, was clearly required to report Kadzik’s crime to the FBI?


3 posted on 11/05/2016 7:40:19 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Hillary's Trickle Up policy: take bribes, sell sleazy pardons, water down AIDS medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

It’s crystal clear that this one email should put Hillary behind bars too.

Simple.

Solid.

Clear source path [straight from wikileaks.]


4 posted on 11/05/2016 7:44:12 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Hillary's Trickle Up policy: take bribes, sell sleazy pardons, water down AIDS medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
As a former (gag) lawyer, Hillary is required to report Kadzik's crime to the FBI.

She's a perfect example of the rot in the legal profession.

5 posted on 11/05/2016 7:50:20 AM PDT by Liz (Experience is a dear teacher, but fools will learn at no other. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

A WikiLeaks/Podesta email shows DOJ’s Peter Kadzik making it clear that he actively assisted Hillary Clinton to avoid disclosure of her illegal email activity.


It is essential for us to call for Mr. Kadzik’s immediate resignation or, in the very least, to be disqualified from any involvement in the review of the emails recently found on Mr. Weiner’s computer.

It is an outrage that Mr. Kadzik has anything further to do with this matter in light of his blatant conflict of interest, not to mention potentially criminal conduct relating to the Congressional investigation.

BOMBARD CONGRESS-——enough already.
Americans demand justice....and we demand it now.

CONTACT CONGRESS HERE: http://www.contactingthecongress.org/

MESSAGE TO CONGRESS: Demand Congress stop the conniving and game-playing. Stop selling out our safety and national security.


REFERENCE:

From: *Peter Kadzik*
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2015
Subject: Heads up To: John Podesta

There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails. Another filing in the

FOIA case went in last night or will go in this am that indicates it will be awhile (2016) before the State Department posts the emails.


https://www.justice.gov/usam/usam-1-4000-standards-conduct#1-4.100

At this link, there are two email addresses for reporting DOJ misconduct:

oig.hotline@usdoj.gov

opr.hotline@usdoj.gov


6 posted on 11/05/2016 7:53:22 AM PDT by Liz (Experience is a dear teacher, but fools will learn at no other. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

For the record, Trey Gowdy was asked about Peter Kadzik on some morning show recently and responded that he thought Kadzik was a fairly straight shooter (not sure exactly what term he used).....


7 posted on 11/05/2016 7:57:11 AM PDT by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Lock him up!


8 posted on 11/05/2016 8:00:33 AM PDT by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

bump


9 posted on 11/05/2016 8:02:03 AM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March; neverdem; SunkenCiv; Cindy; LucyT; decimon; freedumb2003; ...

*PING* to a great posting on Wikileaks from @Arthur Wildfire! March


10 posted on 11/05/2016 8:04:02 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Thanks, Arthur.

bttt


11 posted on 11/05/2016 8:12:13 AM PDT by pax_et_bonum (Never Forget the Seals of Extortion 17 - and God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; TigerClaws; All

Thank you for all of your tireless wikileaks research.


12 posted on 11/05/2016 8:20:58 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Hillary's Trickle Up policy: take bribes, sell sleazy pardons, water down AIDS medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

PFL


13 posted on 11/05/2016 8:22:03 AM PDT by Batman11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hecticskeptic

Gowdy didn’t yet know of these emails when asked. The email linked by post is a follow-up I hadn’t yet seen that adds, “Thanks. Sounds like court hearing more likely to produce additional stories, but who knows.” After prior response re “another opportunity for mischief”


14 posted on 11/05/2016 8:22:45 AM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Liz

God bless you liz!

You are amazing.


15 posted on 11/05/2016 8:23:16 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (Hillary's Trickle Up policy: take bribes, sell sleazy pardons, water down AIDS medicine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Please check out theory posted on Reddit last night in well documented form - remember the emails that came from Blumenthal on his own that weren't in those turned over to state Dept by HRC - the subject of the email was changed to "congrats" and then re-sent with addendum alluding to Chelsea's baby. The theory is that is one thing to do so then Cheryl Mills could delete the whole chain from emails that were first considered, under the guise it was about personal. See: https://m.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5b8zjs/hillarys_33k_and_classified_information_if_they/
16 posted on 11/05/2016 8:32:06 AM PDT by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
THIS JUST IN---Elected Democrats are campaigning alongside Hillary. Let’s remind everyone that under Hillary, the IRS will be the enforcer for Obamacare. If you can’t keep up with the rising premiums, Hillary and Obama made sure the relentless IRS will squeeze it out of you.

===========================================

Isnt it nice to know Dumbocrats are sucking-up to Hillary on the campaign trail---and that party loyalty is still kicking? There's a lot of Democrat amnesia when it comes to O/Care's Congressional voter history. As far back as 2008, at the presidential debate in Nashville, Democrat candidate Obama advanced his signature plan that was ultimately enacted (by an historic straight Democrat party-line vote) into the "Affordable Care Act:"

QUOTING OBAMA: "No. 1, let me just repeat, if you’ve got a health care plan that you like, you can keep it. All I’m going to do is help you to lower the premiums on it. You’ll still have choice of doctor.”

Repeated over and over by every loyal Democrat---- conning Americans into believing they'd also be saving $2500.00 on healthcare costs.

========================================================

LOCK-STEPPING DEMOCRAT PARTY LOYALTY NOT SEEN SINCE 1930-40's ERA EUROPE.

SEN. HARRY REID (D-Nev.): “In fact, one of our core principles is that if you like the health care you have, you can keep it.” (Sen. Reid, Congressional Record, S.8642, 8/3/09)

SEN. RICHARD DURBIN: “We believe — and we stand by this — if you like your current health insurance plan, you will be able to keep it, plain and simple, straightforward.” (Sen. Durbin, Congressional Record, S.6401, 6/10/09)

SEN. CHUCK SCHUMER (D-NY): “If you like your insurance, you keep it.” (U.S. Senate, Finance Committee, Bill Mark-Up, 9/29/09)

SEN. PATTY MURRAY (D-Wash.): “Again, if you like what you have, you will be able to keep it. Let me say this again: If you like what you have, when our legislation is passed and signed by the President, you will be able to keep it.” (Sen. Murray, Congressional Record, S.6400, 6/10/09)

SEN. MAX BAUCUS (D-Mont.): “That is why one of the central promises of health care reform has been and is: If you like what you have, you can keep it. That is critically important. If a person has a plan, and he or she likes it, he or she can keep it.” (Sen. Baucus, Congressional Record, S.7676, 9/29/10)

SEN. TOM HARKIN (D-Iowa): “One of the things we put in the health care bill when we designed it was the protection for consumers to keep the plan they have if they like it; thus, the term ‘grandfathered plans.’ If you have a plan you like — existing policies — you can keep them. … we said, if you like a plan, you get to keep it, and you can grandfather it in.” (Sen. Harkin, Congressional Record, S.7675-6, 9/29/10)

THEN-REP. TAMMY BALDWIN (D-Wis.): “Under the bill, if you like the insurance you have now, you may keep it and it will improve.” (Rep. Baldwin, Press Release, 3/18/10)

SEN. MARK BEGICH (D-Alaska): “If you got a doctor now, you got a medical professional you want, you get to keep that. If you have an insurance program or a health care policy you want of ideas, make sure you keep it. That you can keep who you want.” (Sen. Begich, Townhall Event, 7/27/09)

SEN. MICHAEL BENNET (D-Colo.): “We should begin with a basic principle: if you have coverage and you like it, you can keep it. If you have your doctor, and you like him or her, you should be able to keep them as well. We will not take that choice away from you.” (Sen. Bennet, Press Release, 6/11/09)

SEN. BARBARA BOXER (D-Calif.): “So we Democrats want people to be able to keep the health care they have. And the answer to that is choice of plans. And in the exchange, we’re going to have lots of different plans, and people will be able to keep the health care coverage they need and they want.” (Sen. Boxer, Press Release, 2/8/11)

SEN. SHERROD BROWN (D-Ohio): “Our Democrat bill says if you have health insurance and you like it, you can keep it…”(Sen. Brown, Congressional Record, S.12612, 12/7/09)

SEN. BEN CARDIN (D-Md.): “For the people of Maryland, this bill will provide a rational way in which they can maintain their existing coverage…” (Sen. Cardin, Congressional Record, S.13798, 12/23/09)

SEN. BOB CASEY (D-Pa.): “I also believe this Democrat legislation and the bill we are going to send to President Obama this fall will also have secure choices. If you like what you have, you like the plan you have, you can keep it. It is not going to change.” (Sen. Casey, Congressional Record, S.8070, 7/24/09)

SEN. KAY HAGAN (D-N.C.): ‘People who have insurance they’re happy with can keep it’ “We need to support the private insurance industry so that people who have insurance they’re happy with can keep it while also providing a backstop option for people without access to affordable coverage.” (“Republicans Vent As Other Compromise Plans Get Aired,” National Journal’s Congress Daily, 6/18/09)

SEN. MARY LANDRIEU (D-La.): “If you like the insurance that you have, you’ll be able to keep it.” (MSNBC’s Hardball, 12/16/09)

SEN. PAT LEAHY (D-Vt.): “[I]f you like the insurance you now have, keep the insurance you have.” (CNN’s “Newsroom,” 10/22/09)

SEN. BOB MENENDEZ (D-N.J.): “If you like what you have, you get to keep it” “Menendez is a member of the Senate Finance Committee, which is expected to release a bill later this week. He stressed that consumers who are satisfied with their plans won’t have to change. ‘If you like what you have, you get to keep it,’ he said.” (“Health Care Plan Would Help N.J., Menendez Says,” The Record, 6/19/09)

SEN. JEFF MERKLEY (D-Oreg.): “[E]nsuring that those who like their insurance get to keep it” “The HELP Committee bill sets forward a historic Democrat plan that will, for the first time in American history, give every American access to affordable health coverage, reduce costs, and increase choice, while ensuring that those who like their insurance get to keep it.” (Sen. Merkley, Press Release, 7/15/09)

SEN. BARBARA MIKULSKI (D-Md.): “It means that if you like the insurance you have now, you can keep it.” (Sen. Mikulski, Press Release, 12/24/09)

SEN. JAY ROCKEFELLER (D-W.Va.): “I want people to know, the President’s promise that if you like the coverage you have today you can keep it is a pledge we intend to keep.” (U.S. Senate, Finance Committee, Hearing, 9/23/09)

SEN. JACK REED (D-R.I.): “If you like the insurance you have, you can choose to keep it.” (Sen. Reed, Town Hall Event, 6/25/09)

SEN. BERNIE SANDERS (I-Vt.): “‘If you have coverage you like, you can keep it,’ says Sen. Sanders.” (“Sick And Wrong,” Rolling Stone, 4/5/10)

SEN. JEANNE SHAHEEN (D-N.H.): ‘if you have health coverage that you like, you get to keep it’ “My understanding … is that … if you have health coverage that you like you can keep it. As I said, you may have missed my remarks at the beginning of the call, but one of the things I that I said as a requirement that I have for supporting a Democrat bill is that if you have health coverage that you like you should be able to keep that. …under every scenario that I’ve seen, if you have health coverage that you like, you get to keep it.” (Sen. Shaheen, “Health Care Questions From Across New Hampshire,” Accessed 11/13/13)

SEN. DEBBIE STABENOW (D-Mich.): “As someone who has a large number of large employers in my state, one of the things I appreciate about the Democrat chairman’s remark is — is the grandfathering provisions, the fact that the people in my state, 60 percent of whom have insurance, are going to be able to keep it. And Mr. Chairman, I appreciate that. That’s a strong commitment. It’s clear in the bill … I appreciate the strong commitment on your part and the president to make sure that if you have your insurance you can keep it. That’s the bottom line for me.” (U.S. Senate, Finance Committee, Bill Mark-Up, 9/24/09)

SEN. JON TESTER (D-Mont.): “‘If you like your coverage, you’ll be able to keep it,’ Tester said, adding that if Medicare changes, it will only become stronger”. (“Tester In Baker To Discuss Health Care,” The Fallon County Times, 11/20/09)

SEN. TOM UDALL (D-N.Mex.): “Some worried reform would alter their current coverage. It won’t. If you like your current plan, you can keep it.” (“What I Learned: About Health Care Reform This Summer, By Your Lawmakers In Congress,” Albuquerque Journal, 9/8/09)

SEN. SHELDON WHITEHOUSE (D-R.I.): “..it honors President Obama’s programs and the promise of all of the Presidential candidates that if you like the plan you have, you get to keep it. You are not forced out of anything.” (Sen. Whitehouse, Congressional Record, S.8668, 8/3/09)

Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) the 60th vote on Obamacare: "people who are happy with their current plan, wouldn't need to change it."
FRANKEN YOUTUBE SOUND BITE http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCZmAYYNz8Ihttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCZmAYYNz8I

=====================================================

Twenty-nine Democrats who voted for it (including onetime lawmaker Landrieu who pocketed a bundle to vote for it) were ousted in the 2014 midterm Democrat Demolition Derby.

17 posted on 11/05/2016 8:46:08 AM PDT by Liz (Experience is a dear teacher, but fools will learn at no other. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Yes, but she will say something along the lines of “I don’t recall receiving that email. I get lots and lots of email, and can’t possibly read them all..”


18 posted on 11/05/2016 9:24:30 AM PDT by pieceofthepuzzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March; Liz

It’s crystal clear that this one email should put Hillary behind bars too.

Simple.

Solid.

Clear source path [straight from wikileaks.]
***
totally agree! J. Christian Adams from PJ Media was on tv a day after this wikileaks email appeared. He said as much in the interview. He is a former DOJ employee, so I assume if action was to be taken, he would refer it to the proper office/ person.


19 posted on 11/05/2016 12:35:44 PM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

No, as a former lawyer, she should have known to do so. Once no longer licensed, there is no duty to do so, but she dam well should be roasted for not doing so.


20 posted on 11/05/2016 3:37:46 PM PDT by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson