Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/12/2016 2:02:28 PM PST by RC one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RC one

Sweet


2 posted on 12/12/2016 2:04:34 PM PST by arrogantsob (Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

Sweet


3 posted on 12/12/2016 2:04:34 PM PST by arrogantsob (Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

Empty dem heads exploding.


4 posted on 12/12/2016 2:06:01 PM PST by I want the USA back (Lying Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

The attempts to discredit and weaken his victory will continue. It’s all the left has left: pathetic attempts to strip Trump of his political capital. I’m going to enjoy him crushing them.


5 posted on 12/12/2016 2:07:21 PM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

Hillary is not happy to lose once. She must be a masochist.


6 posted on 12/12/2016 2:08:04 PM PST by LydiaLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

Since all other phony-baloney tantrum tactics failed, I’m standing by for the Soros-sponsored open insurrection during the convening of the EC and Inaugural Day. BITS


7 posted on 12/12/2016 2:09:53 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

Wow, John McCain isn’t going to like this.


8 posted on 12/12/2016 2:11:12 PM PST by Bogie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

ESAD ‘rats

WOOOOHOOOOO!


9 posted on 12/12/2016 2:14:44 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one
Pennsylvania did not reject Stein/Clinton/Soros' request for a recount. Only the PA Secretary of State can request a recount in Pennsylvania, and then only under a statutory requirement that the differene between top candidates be <0.5%.

What Stein asked for were contested elections. She succeeded in convincing a few well-placed suckers to petition their districts for contests. (She had no standing in those contests, by the way, only the suckers -- er, voters -- she convinced to petition the local district boards.) Those contested elections yielded -- as expected -- no statistically significant difference.

Stein also requested a statewide contested election. Unfortunately for her, she was smacked down very very hard by the Federal District Court, which offered six different reasons why she was not entitled to a contested election, including, that in the judge's opinion she had no standing to petition, and he seriously doubted that the Federal Courts even had jurisdiction in the case.

13 posted on 12/12/2016 2:16:38 PM PST by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come 'round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one
Pennsylvania did not reject Stein/Clinton/Soros' request for a recount. Only the PA Secretary of State can request a recount in Pennsylvania, and then only under a statutory requirement that the differene between top candidates be <0.5%.

What Stein asked for were contested elections. She succeeded in convincing a few well-placed suckers to petition their districts for contests. (She had no standing in those contests, by the way, only the suckers -- er, voters -- she convinced to petition the local district boards.) Those contested elections yielded -- as expected -- no statistically significant difference.

Stein also requested a statewide contested election. Unfortunately for her, she was smacked down very very hard by the Federal District Court, which offered six different reasons why she was not entitled to a contested election, including, that in the judge's opinion she had no standing to petition, and he seriously doubted that the Federal Courts even had jurisdiction in the case.

14 posted on 12/12/2016 2:16:41 PM PST by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come 'round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one
The full decision in the PA case may be found here: http://media.philly.com/documents/Stein+el+Al+v+Pedro+A.+Cortes.pdf

It is an absolutely brutal demolition of the Stein/Clinton/Soros effort to contest the PA election, and well worth reading. But for those uninterested in the law, the conclusion is especially devastating:

Dr. Stein has repeatedly stated that she has sought a Pennsylvania recount to ensure that every vote counts. Granting her later than last minute request for relief, however, could well ensure that no Pennsylvania vote counts. Such a result would be both outrageous and completely unnecessary; as I have found, suspicion of a “hacked” Pennsylvania election borders on the irrational. Finally, Plaintiffs’ claims for relief suffer from several flaws, each fatal to their Motion. For all these reasons, I will deny that Motion.

16 posted on 12/12/2016 2:20:41 PM PST by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come 'round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

Expect to hear tonight or tomorrow that Stein has asked the Supreme Court to rule on this.


21 posted on 12/12/2016 2:31:05 PM PST by philippa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

Thanks to Hillary’s donors, Wisconsin families will have $4 million worth of aged Swiss wheels under the tree this year!

Other than economic stimulus, and the opportunity to make a few tweaks to Wisconsin’s “best in class” recount laws, a total waste of time.


22 posted on 12/12/2016 2:31:13 PM PST by bigbob (We have better coverage than Verizon - Can You Hear Us Now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

SPASIBO!


23 posted on 12/12/2016 2:39:37 PM PST by Wilderness Conservative (Nature is the ultimate conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

Yes, it’s all over for the Rats except the crying...


30 posted on 12/12/2016 3:08:00 PM PST by Hotlanta Mike ('You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

Trump wins election for second time!

Liberal rats are having a breakdown.

It’s too bad they don’t have guns or god to cling to.


34 posted on 12/12/2016 4:27:34 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

He promised us he would keep on winning ... score two more.


36 posted on 12/12/2016 4:51:28 PM PST by ThePatriotsFlag ( Anything FREELY-GIVEN by the government was TAKEN from someone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RC one

Rumors are the Russians now also hacked Hillary’s speech adding the line about firing all coal-miners because of green energy, so all of them would vote Trump!


37 posted on 12/12/2016 5:47:15 PM PST by knighthawk (We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson