If you are not a legal citizen of this country you go back to the country you hail from.
Clearly you put a lot of thought and time in to doing this. But I want no Amnesty period. Build the wall, e-verify, birth right citizenship, and make it illegal for any type of federal, state, or local welfare of any kind (including public schooling) for illegal immigrants and they will self deport for you
So the Republicans gave 3 million illegals a pass in 1986 and the Democrats promised to seal the boarder then. Gee, I wonder how that worked out?
No
No Amnesty Period.
Geez, we didn’t work hard to give the Republicans the House, Senate and Whitehouse so they could run a better Amnesty.
If you are here illegally, you have 90 days to register, then one year to leave. If you are a student, in good standing, you may stay to study. Once study is complete, you have 90 days to leave. You cannot live with people illegally in the US. Absolutely no work permits, no access to federally paid or subsidized services. Convicted of any civil or criminal offense voids stay and you must leave immediately. Anyone following terms may apply to legally immigrate to the US once they have returned home. Anyone that does not follow above subject to immediate deportation and barred from returning for 10 years, second time for life. So much simpler, don't you think.
What if President Trump were to offer to pardon all the citizens of Mexico who entered illegally, but not include people who overstayed visas or entered illegally from Mexico or elsewhere who are citizens of other countries?
Hear me out...
Pardoning these Mexican citizens illegally resident here does NOT make them legal; it only removes the penalties that resulted from their illegal entry.
If one barrier to motivating these people to leave and reenter legally is the fear of financial and/or time penalties for their original entry, this would remove that barrier. They would be allowed to enter legally without the fear of their past getting in the way, but they would still have to enter legally.
This would now free up Congress to write legislation that does not have to deal with this. Congress can try to pass legislation that fast-tracks the reentry process.
In other words, perhaps they do not have to physically leave and re-enter; maybe Congress can find a way for people without police records and who have steady jobs to stay here while they follow a documentation process to become legal residents. Once that process completes, then the five-year residency clock can begin before they can be considered for naturalization.
Congress would still have to deal with the issue of people with felony records, and people who have stolen identities (like social security numbers). A pardon would only be limited to the single act of illegal entry; these people would not be pardoned for any other crimes that occurred since then, including ID theft or other crimes that might be argued to stem from the illegal entry.
President Trump would have to very delicately explain to the American people why this is NOT amnesty (and therefore not breaking a campaign promise). The pardon would only cancel the penalty for the illegal entry to encourage illegal aliens to begin a legal entry/documentation process.
Also, Trump should tie this pardon to some concession from Democrats and/or Congress, such as funding the wall or tax reform. The President would only sign such a pardon simultaneously with a bill sent to his desk.
Thoughts?
-PJ
Constitution amendment that repeals the Amendment XIV Section I anchor baby clause
There is NO “Anchor Baby Clause”. The problem is the Willfull Misinterpretation of the English Language and Outright Fraud perpetrated by Lawyers on the English Language itself.
the part that says: “and under the jurisdiction of” is purposely left out of the interpretation and even the discussion, to perpetrate this Fraud upon the American People.
Congress could very easily supply the Court with the proper interpretation and force the issue immediately, but they are they very people behind the treasonous act.
No amnesty.
All the pro-amnesty types are coming out of the woodwork, and are attaching all these “conditions” to disguise the fact that they are just advocating amnesty.
I got a better idea Brian. How about we choose a “test illegal family” and give them your house. After a year, we’ll revisit the issue.
Simplify.
Pass a Constitutional Amendment Securing Identity and Reforming Immigration
1. All persons in the United States shall be uniquely identified by biometric data (eg, finger prints, Iris scan, DNA, etc…)
2. Create and administer through the States a Secure National ID Card and Database.
3. ALL Federal, State and Local Government agencies and authorities shall be forbidden under penalty of law (felony) to use this Database for anything other than the following:
a. Identification of individuals suspected or charged with crimes not related to this amendment.
b. Identification of individuals seeking to transact business with the Federal, State or Local Governments.
c. Identification of individuals voting in Federal, State and Local Municipal elections.
4. All visitors to the United States, regardless of duration of stay or reason for visit, shall be issued a National Visitor Identity Card.
5. All visiting workers in the United States shall be identified and entered into the Secure National ID Database, with detailed work permit information.
6. All employers in the United States, corporate and individual, must use the Secure National ID Database to E-VERIFY for all employment.
7. Any person not entered into the Secure National ID Database shall be ineligible for employment and subject to prosecution. Penalties for violation of sections 6 and 7 would be $50,000 per violation per day.
8. After 1 year from passage of this law, any foreigner caught in the United States without a valid National Visitor Identity Card shall be deported and permanently barred from entry into the United States.
9. Citizenship shall not be conferred to children born in the United States to non-citizens.
a. Exception: A child born to two lawfully married parents, whose marriage is more than 1 year before the date of the child’s birth, when only one parent is a citizen of the United States. Both parents must petition for US Citizenship in writing.
I like that this is contingent on passing a Constitutional amendment which makes the baby the citizenship of the mother.
Left out: restrictions in relative who can enter.I would allow *elderly* parents, minor children, and spouses, none of whom would be eligible for government money. And I would allow for hardship cases such as disabled relatives with no one else to care for them.
There are approximately 30 million illegals in this country that need to be deported..
How about taking your long list of “conditions” that would take legions of government employees to oversee, administer, and verify and sticking them where the sun don’t shine. Same goes for your “health care” proposals on your home page.
Thank you SO much for doing a job Americans in the US Congress won’t do.
Personally, I’m in the deport all illegal aliens camp. However, recognizing practical and political realities, I propose the following:
1. For any DACA individual convicted of a criminal offense immediate deportation, no appeals whatsoever.
2. NO chain migration other than proven mother and/or father for DACA individuals or anchor babies, and NO further chain migration from said mother/father.
3. DACA individuals may apply for citizenship but must go to the back of the line.
President Trump should not endorse and ESPECIALLY not sign ‘comprehensive immigration reform’ without these features, and especially when it includes a general amnesty (which it will). If The US Congress passes it , let them own it.
I’m sure all those doing it legally will appreciate this. Maybe they can read the full text while they’re waiting.